RF-DETR Medium Finetuned on RDD2022 Road Damage
0
3 commits
3 linked in READMEs
updated Oct 1, 2026
Fine-tuned RF-DETR Medium object detector on the RDD2022 Road Damage benchmark dataset, trained and evaluated as part of DetectionBench -- a framework for reproducibly benchmarking modern object detectors with identical training recipes and evaluation metrics across multiple real-world datasets.
pip install rfdetr huggingface_hub
from huggingface_hub import hf_hub_download
import rfdetr
weights = hf_hub_download(
repo_id="dronefreak/rdd2022-rfdetr-medium",
filename="checkpoint_best_total.pth"
)
model = rfdetr.RFDETRMedium(pretrain_weights=weights)
detections = model.predict("image.jpg", threshold=0.25)
Evaluated on the RDD2022 Road Damage test split, using DetectionBench's standard evaluation pipeline (detectionbench-evaluate).
| Metric | Score (%) |
|---|---|
| mAP@50 | 65.08 |
| mAP@50-95 | 36.02 |
| Precision | 71.18 |
| Recall | 55.98 |
| F1 Score | 62.67 |
| Parameters | 33.7M |
| FLOPs | N/A (not published upstream) |
Every model DetectionBench has trained and evaluated on RDD2022 Road Damage so far, for full transparency -- see DetectionBench for the smaller, curated comparison set used on the project README.
| Model | mAP@50 | mAP@50-95 | Precision | Recall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RF-DETR Medium | 65.08 | 36.02 | 71.18 | 55.98 |
| RF-DETR Small | 64.71 | 35.73 | 65.69 | 59.41 |
| YOLOv8m | 62.03 | 34.08 | 65.61 | 57.42 |
| YOLOv8s | 61.45 | 33.53 | 64.55 | 57.18 |
| YOLO26s | 61.27 | 33.3 | 64.42 | 57.13 |
| YOLO26m | 61.24 | 33.38 | 63.7 | 57.27 |
| RF-DETR Nano | 60.85 | 33.22 | 65.49 | 54.3 |
| YOLOv8n | 58.8 | 32.05 | 62.03 | 56.08 |
| YOLO11x | 51.05 | 26.54 | 56.64 | 49.54 |
| Class | mAP@50 | mAP@50-95 |
|---|---|---|
| longitudinal_crack | 59.57 | 31.99 |
| transverse_crack | 59.86 | 30.22 |
| alligator_crack | 66.22 | 35.37 |
| pothole | 74.68 | 46.48 |
This model was evaluated with Supervision's detection metrics, which report mAP/Precision/Recall directly but don't produce a confusion-matrix plot the way Ultralytics' validator does.
This model was trained on RDD2022 Road Damage. For the full dataset description, provenance, license, and citation, see the dataset card:
https://huggingface.co/datasets/dronefreak/RDD2022
| Setting | Value |
|---|---|
| Dataset | RDD2022 Road Damage |
| Framework | RF-DETR |
| Training Toolkit | DetectionBench |
| Epochs (configured max) | 50 |
| Epochs (actually trained) | 24 |
| Early Stopping Patience | 10 |
| Batch Size | 5 |
| Resolution | 576 |
| Optimizer | adamw |
| Learning Rate | 0.0001 |
| Seed | 42 |
checkpoint_best_total.pth
metrics.csv
config.json
rdd2022_rfdetr-medium_showcase.jpg
README.md
This model was trained using DetectionBench, an open-source framework for benchmarking object detectors across multiple real-world datasets with a common pipeline.
Features include:
If you find this model useful, please consider starring the repository.
test split here is a held-out 15% slice (70/15/15 split) of the publicly-labelled images, merged across countries -- scores are only comparable between the models listed in this card's Model Zoo.longitudinal_crack (44.0%) is the most common class, while pothole (18.1%) and alligator_crack (17.9%) are the rarest of the four -- per-class accuracy differs noticeably between them.If you use this model in your research, please consider citing the dataset and the model architecture:
@article{arya2022rdd2022,
title = {RDD2022: A multi-national image dataset for automatic Road Damage Detection},
author = {Arya, Deeksha and Maeda, Hiroya and Ghosh, Sanjay Kumar and Toshniwal, Durga and Sekimoto, Yoshihide},
journal = {arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.08538},
year = {2022}
}
@inproceedings{robinson2026rfdetr,
title = {RF-DETR: Real-Time Detection Transformer},
author = {Robinson, Isaac and Robicheaux, Peter and Popov, Matvei and Ramanan, Deva and Peri, Neehar},
booktitle = {International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR)},
year = {2026},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.09554}
}
@article{oquab2023dinov2,
title={DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision},
author={Oquab, Maxime and Darcet, Timoth{\'e}e and Moutakanni, Theo and Vo, Huy and Szafraniec, Marc and Khalidov, Vasil and Fernandez, Pierre and Haziza, Daniel and Massa, Francisco and El-Nouby, Alaaeldin and others},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.07193},
year={2023}
}
RF-DETR Medium Finetuned on RDD2022 Road Damage
0
3 commits
3 linked in READMEs
updated Oct 1, 2026
Fine-tuned RF-DETR Medium object detector on the RDD2022 Road Damage benchmark dataset, trained and evaluated as part of DetectionBench -- a framework for reproducibly benchmarking modern object detectors with identical training recipes and evaluation metrics across multiple real-world datasets.
pip install rfdetr huggingface_hub
from huggingface_hub import hf_hub_download
import rfdetr
weights = hf_hub_download(
repo_id="dronefreak/rdd2022-rfdetr-medium",
filename="checkpoint_best_total.pth"
)
model = rfdetr.RFDETRMedium(pretrain_weights=weights)
detections = model.predict("image.jpg", threshold=0.25)
Evaluated on the RDD2022 Road Damage test split, using DetectionBench's standard evaluation pipeline (detectionbench-evaluate).
| Metric | Score (%) |
|---|---|
| mAP@50 | 65.08 |
| mAP@50-95 | 36.02 |
| Precision | 71.18 |
| Recall | 55.98 |
| F1 Score | 62.67 |
| Parameters | 33.7M |
| FLOPs | N/A (not published upstream) |
Every model DetectionBench has trained and evaluated on RDD2022 Road Damage so far, for full transparency -- see DetectionBench for the smaller, curated comparison set used on the project README.
| Model | mAP@50 | mAP@50-95 | Precision | Recall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RF-DETR Medium | 65.08 | 36.02 | 71.18 | 55.98 |
| RF-DETR Small | 64.71 | 35.73 | 65.69 | 59.41 |
| YOLOv8m | 62.03 | 34.08 | 65.61 | 57.42 |
| YOLOv8s | 61.45 | 33.53 | 64.55 | 57.18 |
| YOLO26s | 61.27 | 33.3 | 64.42 | 57.13 |
| YOLO26m | 61.24 | 33.38 | 63.7 | 57.27 |
| RF-DETR Nano | 60.85 | 33.22 | 65.49 | 54.3 |
| YOLOv8n | 58.8 | 32.05 | 62.03 | 56.08 |
| YOLO11x | 51.05 | 26.54 | 56.64 | 49.54 |
| Class | mAP@50 | mAP@50-95 |
|---|---|---|
| longitudinal_crack | 59.57 | 31.99 |
| transverse_crack | 59.86 | 30.22 |
| alligator_crack | 66.22 | 35.37 |
| pothole | 74.68 | 46.48 |
This model was evaluated with Supervision's detection metrics, which report mAP/Precision/Recall directly but don't produce a confusion-matrix plot the way Ultralytics' validator does.
This model was trained on RDD2022 Road Damage. For the full dataset description, provenance, license, and citation, see the dataset card:
https://huggingface.co/datasets/dronefreak/RDD2022
| Setting | Value |
|---|---|
| Dataset | RDD2022 Road Damage |
| Framework | RF-DETR |
| Training Toolkit | DetectionBench |
| Epochs (configured max) | 50 |
| Epochs (actually trained) | 24 |
| Early Stopping Patience | 10 |
| Batch Size | 5 |
| Resolution | 576 |
| Optimizer | adamw |
| Learning Rate | 0.0001 |
| Seed | 42 |
checkpoint_best_total.pth
metrics.csv
config.json
rdd2022_rfdetr-medium_showcase.jpg
README.md
This model was trained using DetectionBench, an open-source framework for benchmarking object detectors across multiple real-world datasets with a common pipeline.
Features include:
If you find this model useful, please consider starring the repository.
test split here is a held-out 15% slice (70/15/15 split) of the publicly-labelled images, merged across countries -- scores are only comparable between the models listed in this card's Model Zoo.longitudinal_crack (44.0%) is the most common class, while pothole (18.1%) and alligator_crack (17.9%) are the rarest of the four -- per-class accuracy differs noticeably between them.If you use this model in your research, please consider citing the dataset and the model architecture:
@article{arya2022rdd2022,
title = {RDD2022: A multi-national image dataset for automatic Road Damage Detection},
author = {Arya, Deeksha and Maeda, Hiroya and Ghosh, Sanjay Kumar and Toshniwal, Durga and Sekimoto, Yoshihide},
journal = {arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.08538},
year = {2022}
}
@inproceedings{robinson2026rfdetr,
title = {RF-DETR: Real-Time Detection Transformer},
author = {Robinson, Isaac and Robicheaux, Peter and Popov, Matvei and Ramanan, Deva and Peri, Neehar},
booktitle = {International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR)},
year = {2026},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.09554}
}
@article{oquab2023dinov2,
title={DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision},
author={Oquab, Maxime and Darcet, Timoth{\'e}e and Moutakanni, Theo and Vo, Huy and Szafraniec, Marc and Khalidov, Vasil and Fernandez, Pierre and Haziza, Daniel and Massa, Francisco and El-Nouby, Alaaeldin and others},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.07193},
year={2023}
}