Fine-tuned RF-DETR Small object detector on the ExDark benchmark dataset, trained and evaluated as part of DetectionBench -- a framework for reproducibly benchmarking modern object detectors with identical training recipes and evaluation metrics across multiple real-world datasets.
pip install rfdetr huggingface_hub
from huggingface_hub import hf_hub_download
import rfdetr
weights = hf_hub_download(
repo_id="dronefreak/exdark-rfdetr-small",
filename="checkpoint_best_total.pth"
)
model = rfdetr.RFDETRSmall(pretrain_weights=weights)
detections = model.predict("image.jpg", threshold=0.25)
Evaluated on the ExDark test split, using DetectionBench's standard evaluation pipeline (detectionbench-evaluate).
| Metric | Score (%) |
|---|---|
| mAP@50 | 88.98 |
| mAP@50-95 | 61.67 |
| Precision | 83.07 |
| Recall | 81.89 |
| F1 Score | 82.47 |
| Parameters | 32.1M |
| FLOPs | N/A (not published upstream) |
Every model DetectionBench has trained and evaluated on ExDark so far, for full transparency -- see DetectionBench for the smaller, curated comparison set used on the project README.
| Model | mAP@50 | mAP@50-95 | Precision | Recall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RF-DETR Small | 88.98 | 61.67 | 83.07 | 81.89 |
| RF-DETR Medium | 88.64 | 62.55 | 86.6 | 79.46 |
| RF-DETR Nano | 85.27 | 58.01 | 85.18 | 74.67 |
| YOLO26l | 77.51 | 50.88 | 80.71 | 70.72 |
| YOLO26m | 76.54 | 50.02 | 82.29 | 68.83 |
| YOLOv8x | 75.4 | 48.39 | 81.53 | 65.86 |
| YOLOv8l | 75.26 | 48.48 | 81.44 | 67.58 |
| YOLOv8m | 74.69 | 48.05 | 78.4 | 69.17 |
| YOLO11x | 74.41 | 48.98 | 81.87 | 67.05 |
| YOLOv9m | 74.17 | 47.38 | 76.27 | 67.94 |
| YOLO26s | 74.0 | 48.32 | 79.11 | 65.59 |
| YOLO11l | 73.44 | 47.56 | 78.57 | 67.09 |
| YOLO11s | 73.35 | 46.8 | 77.93 | 66.38 |
| YOLO11m | 73.17 | 47.16 | 74.83 | 67.23 |
| YOLOv8s | 73.01 | 45.85 | 78.26 | 65.13 |
| YOLO26n | 72.7 | 46.27 | 81.0 | 62.67 |
| YOLOv8n | 71.29 | 44.78 | 78.25 | 62.76 |
| YOLO11n | 70.36 | 44.72 | 76.18 | 61.15 |
| Class | mAP@50 | mAP@50-95 |
|---|---|---|
| Bicycle | 86.93 | 59.86 |
| Boat | 90.85 | 53.93 |
| Bottle | 83.89 | 55.29 |
| Bus | 92.73 | 73.55 |
| Car | 91.06 | 63.48 |
| Cat | 93.3 | 67.46 |
| Chair | 84.5 | 58.98 |
| Cup | 87.67 | 59.94 |
| Dog | 92.96 | 69.4 |
| Motorbike | 92.07 | 65.0 |
| People | 88.93 | 55.46 |
| Table | 82.91 | 57.74 |
This model was evaluated with Supervision's detection metrics, which report mAP/Precision/Recall directly but don't produce a confusion-matrix plot the way Ultralytics' validator does.
This model was trained on ExDark. For the full dataset description, provenance, license, and citation, see the dataset card:
https://huggingface.co/datasets/dronefreak/ExDark
| Setting | Value |
|---|---|
| Dataset | ExDark |
| Framework | RF-DETR |
| Training Toolkit | DetectionBench |
| Epochs (configured max) | 500 |
| Epochs (actually trained) | 104 |
| Early Stopping Patience | 100 |
| Batch Size | 11 |
| Resolution | 512 |
| Optimizer | adamw |
| Learning Rate | 0.0001 |
| Seed | 42 |
checkpoint_best_total.pth
metrics.csv
config.json
exdark_rfdetr-small_showcase.jpg
README.md
This model was trained using DetectionBench, an open-source framework for benchmarking object detectors across multiple real-world datasets with a common pipeline.
Features include:
If you find this model useful, please consider starring the repository.
People accounts for roughly 46% of all annotated boxes while Bus is the rarest class, so per-class accuracy on rare classes is measured on very few test examples and should be read with wide uncertainty.If you use this model in your research, please consider citing the dataset and the model architecture:
@article{Exdark,
title = {Getting to Know Low-light Images with The Exclusively Dark Dataset},
author = {Loh, Yuen Peng and Chan, Chee Seng},
journal = {Computer Vision and Image Understanding},
volume = {178},
pages = {30-42},
year = {2019},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cviu.2018.10.010}
}
@inproceedings{robinson2026rfdetr,
title = {RF-DETR: Real-Time Detection Transformer},
author = {Robinson, Isaac and Robicheaux, Peter and Popov, Matvei and Ramanan, Deva and Peri, Neehar},
booktitle = {International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR)},
year = {2026},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.09554}
}
@article{oquab2023dinov2,
title={DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision},
author={Oquab, Maxime and Darcet, Timoth{\'e}e and Moutakanni, Theo and Vo, Huy and Szafraniec, Marc and Khalidov, Vasil and Fernandez, Pierre and Haziza, Daniel and Massa, Francisco and El-Nouby, Alaaeldin and others},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.07193},
year={2023}
}
Fine-tuned RF-DETR Small object detector on the ExDark benchmark dataset, trained and evaluated as part of DetectionBench -- a framework for reproducibly benchmarking modern object detectors with identical training recipes and evaluation metrics across multiple real-world datasets.
pip install rfdetr huggingface_hub
from huggingface_hub import hf_hub_download
import rfdetr
weights = hf_hub_download(
repo_id="dronefreak/exdark-rfdetr-small",
filename="checkpoint_best_total.pth"
)
model = rfdetr.RFDETRSmall(pretrain_weights=weights)
detections = model.predict("image.jpg", threshold=0.25)
Evaluated on the ExDark test split, using DetectionBench's standard evaluation pipeline (detectionbench-evaluate).
| Metric | Score (%) |
|---|---|
| mAP@50 | 88.98 |
| mAP@50-95 | 61.67 |
| Precision | 83.07 |
| Recall | 81.89 |
| F1 Score | 82.47 |
| Parameters | 32.1M |
| FLOPs | N/A (not published upstream) |
Every model DetectionBench has trained and evaluated on ExDark so far, for full transparency -- see DetectionBench for the smaller, curated comparison set used on the project README.
| Model | mAP@50 | mAP@50-95 | Precision | Recall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RF-DETR Small | 88.98 | 61.67 | 83.07 | 81.89 |
| RF-DETR Medium | 88.64 | 62.55 | 86.6 | 79.46 |
| RF-DETR Nano | 85.27 | 58.01 | 85.18 | 74.67 |
| YOLO26l | 77.51 | 50.88 | 80.71 | 70.72 |
| YOLO26m | 76.54 | 50.02 | 82.29 | 68.83 |
| YOLOv8x | 75.4 | 48.39 | 81.53 | 65.86 |
| YOLOv8l | 75.26 | 48.48 | 81.44 | 67.58 |
| YOLOv8m | 74.69 | 48.05 | 78.4 | 69.17 |
| YOLO11x | 74.41 | 48.98 | 81.87 | 67.05 |
| YOLOv9m | 74.17 | 47.38 | 76.27 | 67.94 |
| YOLO26s | 74.0 | 48.32 | 79.11 | 65.59 |
| YOLO11l | 73.44 | 47.56 | 78.57 | 67.09 |
| YOLO11s | 73.35 | 46.8 | 77.93 | 66.38 |
| YOLO11m | 73.17 | 47.16 | 74.83 | 67.23 |
| YOLOv8s | 73.01 | 45.85 | 78.26 | 65.13 |
| YOLO26n | 72.7 | 46.27 | 81.0 | 62.67 |
| YOLOv8n | 71.29 | 44.78 | 78.25 | 62.76 |
| YOLO11n | 70.36 | 44.72 | 76.18 | 61.15 |
| Class | mAP@50 | mAP@50-95 |
|---|---|---|
| Bicycle | 86.93 | 59.86 |
| Boat | 90.85 | 53.93 |
| Bottle | 83.89 | 55.29 |
| Bus | 92.73 | 73.55 |
| Car | 91.06 | 63.48 |
| Cat | 93.3 | 67.46 |
| Chair | 84.5 | 58.98 |
| Cup | 87.67 | 59.94 |
| Dog | 92.96 | 69.4 |
| Motorbike | 92.07 | 65.0 |
| People | 88.93 | 55.46 |
| Table | 82.91 | 57.74 |
This model was evaluated with Supervision's detection metrics, which report mAP/Precision/Recall directly but don't produce a confusion-matrix plot the way Ultralytics' validator does.
This model was trained on ExDark. For the full dataset description, provenance, license, and citation, see the dataset card:
https://huggingface.co/datasets/dronefreak/ExDark
| Setting | Value |
|---|---|
| Dataset | ExDark |
| Framework | RF-DETR |
| Training Toolkit | DetectionBench |
| Epochs (configured max) | 500 |
| Epochs (actually trained) | 104 |
| Early Stopping Patience | 100 |
| Batch Size | 11 |
| Resolution | 512 |
| Optimizer | adamw |
| Learning Rate | 0.0001 |
| Seed | 42 |
checkpoint_best_total.pth
metrics.csv
config.json
exdark_rfdetr-small_showcase.jpg
README.md
This model was trained using DetectionBench, an open-source framework for benchmarking object detectors across multiple real-world datasets with a common pipeline.
Features include:
If you find this model useful, please consider starring the repository.
People accounts for roughly 46% of all annotated boxes while Bus is the rarest class, so per-class accuracy on rare classes is measured on very few test examples and should be read with wide uncertainty.If you use this model in your research, please consider citing the dataset and the model architecture:
@article{Exdark,
title = {Getting to Know Low-light Images with The Exclusively Dark Dataset},
author = {Loh, Yuen Peng and Chan, Chee Seng},
journal = {Computer Vision and Image Understanding},
volume = {178},
pages = {30-42},
year = {2019},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cviu.2018.10.010}
}
@inproceedings{robinson2026rfdetr,
title = {RF-DETR: Real-Time Detection Transformer},
author = {Robinson, Isaac and Robicheaux, Peter and Popov, Matvei and Ramanan, Deva and Peri, Neehar},
booktitle = {International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR)},
year = {2026},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.09554}
}
@article{oquab2023dinov2,
title={DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision},
author={Oquab, Maxime and Darcet, Timoth{\'e}e and Moutakanni, Theo and Vo, Huy and Szafraniec, Marc and Khalidov, Vasil and Fernandez, Pierre and Haziza, Daniel and Massa, Francisco and El-Nouby, Alaaeldin and others},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.07193},
year={2023}
}