Fine-tuned YOLO26m object detector on the UAVDT benchmark dataset, trained and evaluated as part of DetectionBench -- a framework for reproducibly benchmarking modern object detectors with identical training recipes and evaluation metrics across multiple real-world datasets.

pip install ultralytics huggingface_hub
from huggingface_hub import hf_hub_download
from ultralytics import YOLO
weights = hf_hub_download(
repo_id="dronefreak/uavdt-yolo26m",
filename="best.pt"
)
model = YOLO(weights)
results = model.predict(
source="image.jpg",
conf=0.25
)
results[0].show()
Evaluated on the UAVDT test split, using DetectionBench's standard evaluation pipeline (detectionbench-evaluate).
| Metric | Score (%) |
|---|---|
| mAP@50 | 33.43 |
| mAP@50-95 | 19.56 |
| Precision | 38.14 |
| Recall | 39.84 |
| F1 Score | 38.97 |
| Parameters | 21.9M |
| FLOPs | 75.4B (at 640 px) |
Every model DetectionBench has trained and evaluated on UAVDT so far, for full transparency -- see DetectionBench for the smaller, curated comparison set used on the project README.
| Model | mAP@50 | mAP@50-95 | Precision | Recall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YOLO26m | 33.43 | 19.56 | 38.14 | 39.84 |
| RF-DETR Medium | 33.28 | 20.54 | 73.03 | 70.03 |
| YOLO26s | 32.98 | 19.61 | 43.86 | 40.38 |
| RF-DETR Nano | 32.78 | 20.31 | 73.6 | 66.98 |
| YOLO26x | 32.65 | 19.22 | 41.85 | 38.19 |
| YOLO26l | 32.64 | 18.75 | 40.17 | 36.45 |
| RF-DETR Small | 32.62 | 20.21 | 73.83 | 71.63 |
| YOLOv9s | 31.82 | 18.71 | 39.83 | 38.12 |
| YOLOv8m | 31.42 | 18.8 | 40.27 | 37.79 |
| YOLO11x | 31.05 | 18.31 | 37.4 | 36.38 |
| YOLO11m | 30.47 | 17.71 | 37.7 | 37.01 |
| YOLOv8x | 30.47 | 17.66 | 39.61 | 36.16 |
| YOLOv10m | 30.12 | 17.33 | 40.13 | 35.68 |
| YOLOv9m | 29.43 | 16.97 | 35.92 | 35.7 |
| YOLOv9t | 29.42 | 17.03 | 35.75 | 36.47 |
| YOLOv10x | 29.38 | 17.15 | 37.29 | 35.15 |
| YOLOv10l | 29.16 | 16.54 | 36.9 | 35.6 |
| YOLOv9c | 29.16 | 16.46 | 35.38 | 34.35 |
| YOLO11s | 29.1 | 17.16 | 34.32 | 37.31 |
| YOLO26n | 28.88 | 16.79 | 33.14 | 35.66 |
| YOLOv8l | 28.86 | 17.27 | 38.33 | 32.86 |
| YOLOv10s | 28.85 | 16.48 | 36.53 | 33.16 |
| YOLO11l | 28.64 | 17.16 | 34.75 | 34.02 |
| YOLO11n | 28.56 | 16.3 | 38.04 | 32.26 |
| YOLOv9e | 28.1 | 16.6 | 35.51 | 32.54 |
| YOLOv8n | 27.8 | 15.34 | 35.42 | 33.61 |
| YOLOv10n | 27.17 | 15.16 | 33.3 | 31.21 |
| YOLOv8s | 27.12 | 15.33 | 34.65 | 31.87 |
| Class | mAP@50 | mAP@50-95 |
|---|---|---|
| car | 73.75 | 40.42 |
| truck | 12.67 | 8.12 |
| bus | 13.88 | 10.14 |

This model was trained on UAVDT. For the full dataset description, provenance, license, and citation, see the dataset card:
https://huggingface.co/datasets/dronefreak/UAVDT
| Setting | Value |
|---|---|
| Dataset | UAVDT |
| Framework | Ultralytics YOLO |
| Training Toolkit | DetectionBench |
| Epochs (configured max) | 30 |
| Epochs (actually trained) | 11 |
| Early Stopping Patience | 8 |
| Batch Size | auto (Ultralytics AutoBatch) |
| Image Size | 1024 |
| Optimizer | AdamW |
| Initial Learning Rate | 0.0005 |
| Seed | 0 |
best.pt
results.csv
args.yaml
BoxPR_curve.png
BoxF1_curve.png
BoxP_curve.png
BoxR_curve.png
confusion_matrix.png
confusion_matrix_normalized.png
val_batch0_pred.jpg
uavdt_yolo26m_showcase.jpg
assets/demo_banner.mp4
assets/demo_banner_poster.jpg
README.md
This model was trained using DetectionBench, an open-source framework for benchmarking object detectors across multiple real-world datasets with a common pipeline.
Features include:
If you find this model useful, please consider starring the repository.
car (94.6%) dominates the annotated boxes, while truck (3.1%) and bus (2.3%) are rare -- per-class accuracy on the minority classes is measured on comparatively few examples, and every model here scores far lower on them than on car.If you use this model in your research, please consider citing the dataset and the model architecture:
@InProceedings{du2018unmanned,
title={The Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Benchmark: Object Detection and Tracking},
author={Du, Dawei and Qi, Yuankai and Yu, Hongyang and Yang, Yifan and Duan, Kaiwen and Li, Guorong and Zhang, Weigang and Huang, Qingming and Tian, Qi},
booktitle={Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV)},
year={2018}
}
@article{jocher2026yolo26,
title={Ultralytics YOLO26: Unified Real-Time End-to-End Vision Models},
author={Jocher, Glenn and Qiu, Jing and Liu, Mengyu and Lyu, Shuai and Akyon, Fatih Cagatay and Kalfaoglu, Muhammet Esat},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.03748},
year={2026}
}
Fine-tuned YOLO26m object detector on the UAVDT benchmark dataset, trained and evaluated as part of DetectionBench -- a framework for reproducibly benchmarking modern object detectors with identical training recipes and evaluation metrics across multiple real-world datasets.

pip install ultralytics huggingface_hub
from huggingface_hub import hf_hub_download
from ultralytics import YOLO
weights = hf_hub_download(
repo_id="dronefreak/uavdt-yolo26m",
filename="best.pt"
)
model = YOLO(weights)
results = model.predict(
source="image.jpg",
conf=0.25
)
results[0].show()
Evaluated on the UAVDT test split, using DetectionBench's standard evaluation pipeline (detectionbench-evaluate).
| Metric | Score (%) |
|---|---|
| mAP@50 | 33.43 |
| mAP@50-95 | 19.56 |
| Precision | 38.14 |
| Recall | 39.84 |
| F1 Score | 38.97 |
| Parameters | 21.9M |
| FLOPs | 75.4B (at 640 px) |
Every model DetectionBench has trained and evaluated on UAVDT so far, for full transparency -- see DetectionBench for the smaller, curated comparison set used on the project README.
| Model | mAP@50 | mAP@50-95 | Precision | Recall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YOLO26m | 33.43 | 19.56 | 38.14 | 39.84 |
| RF-DETR Medium | 33.28 | 20.54 | 73.03 | 70.03 |
| YOLO26s | 32.98 | 19.61 | 43.86 | 40.38 |
| RF-DETR Nano | 32.78 | 20.31 | 73.6 | 66.98 |
| YOLO26x | 32.65 | 19.22 | 41.85 | 38.19 |
| YOLO26l | 32.64 | 18.75 | 40.17 | 36.45 |
| RF-DETR Small | 32.62 | 20.21 | 73.83 | 71.63 |
| YOLOv9s | 31.82 | 18.71 | 39.83 | 38.12 |
| YOLOv8m | 31.42 | 18.8 | 40.27 | 37.79 |
| YOLO11x | 31.05 | 18.31 | 37.4 | 36.38 |
| YOLO11m | 30.47 | 17.71 | 37.7 | 37.01 |
| YOLOv8x | 30.47 | 17.66 | 39.61 | 36.16 |
| YOLOv10m | 30.12 | 17.33 | 40.13 | 35.68 |
| YOLOv9m | 29.43 | 16.97 | 35.92 | 35.7 |
| YOLOv9t | 29.42 | 17.03 | 35.75 | 36.47 |
| YOLOv10x | 29.38 | 17.15 | 37.29 | 35.15 |
| YOLOv10l | 29.16 | 16.54 | 36.9 | 35.6 |
| YOLOv9c | 29.16 | 16.46 | 35.38 | 34.35 |
| YOLO11s | 29.1 | 17.16 | 34.32 | 37.31 |
| YOLO26n | 28.88 | 16.79 | 33.14 | 35.66 |
| YOLOv8l | 28.86 | 17.27 | 38.33 | 32.86 |
| YOLOv10s | 28.85 | 16.48 | 36.53 | 33.16 |
| YOLO11l | 28.64 | 17.16 | 34.75 | 34.02 |
| YOLO11n | 28.56 | 16.3 | 38.04 | 32.26 |
| YOLOv9e | 28.1 | 16.6 | 35.51 | 32.54 |
| YOLOv8n | 27.8 | 15.34 | 35.42 | 33.61 |
| YOLOv10n | 27.17 | 15.16 | 33.3 | 31.21 |
| YOLOv8s | 27.12 | 15.33 | 34.65 | 31.87 |
| Class | mAP@50 | mAP@50-95 |
|---|---|---|
| car | 73.75 | 40.42 |
| truck | 12.67 | 8.12 |
| bus | 13.88 | 10.14 |

This model was trained on UAVDT. For the full dataset description, provenance, license, and citation, see the dataset card:
https://huggingface.co/datasets/dronefreak/UAVDT
| Setting | Value |
|---|---|
| Dataset | UAVDT |
| Framework | Ultralytics YOLO |
| Training Toolkit | DetectionBench |
| Epochs (configured max) | 30 |
| Epochs (actually trained) | 11 |
| Early Stopping Patience | 8 |
| Batch Size | auto (Ultralytics AutoBatch) |
| Image Size | 1024 |
| Optimizer | AdamW |
| Initial Learning Rate | 0.0005 |
| Seed | 0 |
best.pt
results.csv
args.yaml
BoxPR_curve.png
BoxF1_curve.png
BoxP_curve.png
BoxR_curve.png
confusion_matrix.png
confusion_matrix_normalized.png
val_batch0_pred.jpg
uavdt_yolo26m_showcase.jpg
assets/demo_banner.mp4
assets/demo_banner_poster.jpg
README.md
This model was trained using DetectionBench, an open-source framework for benchmarking object detectors across multiple real-world datasets with a common pipeline.
Features include:
If you find this model useful, please consider starring the repository.
car (94.6%) dominates the annotated boxes, while truck (3.1%) and bus (2.3%) are rare -- per-class accuracy on the minority classes is measured on comparatively few examples, and every model here scores far lower on them than on car.If you use this model in your research, please consider citing the dataset and the model architecture:
@InProceedings{du2018unmanned,
title={The Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Benchmark: Object Detection and Tracking},
author={Du, Dawei and Qi, Yuankai and Yu, Hongyang and Yang, Yifan and Duan, Kaiwen and Li, Guorong and Zhang, Weigang and Huang, Qingming and Tian, Qi},
booktitle={Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV)},
year={2018}
}
@article{jocher2026yolo26,
title={Ultralytics YOLO26: Unified Real-Time End-to-End Vision Models},
author={Jocher, Glenn and Qiu, Jing and Liu, Mengyu and Lyu, Shuai and Akyon, Fatih Cagatay and Kalfaoglu, Muhammet Esat},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.03748},
year={2026}
}