Welcome to the repository for our survey paper, "From System 1 to System 2: A Survey of Reasoning Large Language Models". This repository provides resources and updates related to our research. For a detailed introduction, please refer to our survey paper.
Achieving human-level intelligence requires enhancing the transition from System 1 (fast, intuitive) to System 2 (slow, deliberate) reasoning. While foundational Large Language Models (LLMs) have made significant strides, they still fall short of human-like reasoning in complex tasks. Recent reasoning LLMs, like OpenAI’s o1, have demonstrated expert-level performance in domains such as mathematics and coding, resembling System 2 thinking. This survey explores the development of reasoning LLMs, their foundational technologies, benchmarks, and future directions. We maintain an up-to-date GitHub repository to track the latest developments in this rapidly evolving field.
This image highlights the progression of AI systems, emphasizing the shift from rapid, intuitive approaches to deliberate, reasoning-driven models. It shows how AI has evolved to handle a broader range of real-world challenges.
The recent timeline of reasoning LLMs, covering core methods and the release of open-source and closed-source reproduction projects.
ThinkBench: Dynamic Out-of-Distribution Evaluation for Robust LLM Reasoning [paper]
ProBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models in Competitive Programming [paper]
ZebraLogic: On the Scaling Limits of LLMs for Logical Reasoning [paper]
DivIL: Unveiling and Addressing Over-Invariance for Out-of-Distribution Generalization [paper]
QuestBench: Can LLMs ask the right question to acquire information in reasoning tasks? [paper]
Benchmarking Reasoning Robustness in Large Language Models [paper]
Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models: Assessing Logical and Arithmetic Errors across Wide Numerical Ranges [paper]
Inference-Time Computations for LLM Reasoning and Planning: A Benchmark and Insights [paper]
Rewardbench: Evaluating reward models for language modeling [paper]
Evaluating LLMs at Detecting Errors in LLM Responses [paper]
CriticBench: Benchmarking LLMs for Critique-Correct Reasoning [paper]
Judgebench: A benchmark for evaluating llm-based judges [paper]
Errorradar: Benchmarking complex mathematical reasoning of multimodal large language models via error detection [paper]
Processbench: Identifying process errors in mathematical reasoning [paper]
Medec: A benchmark for medical error detection and correction in clinical notes [paper]
CodeCriticBench: A Holistic Code Critique Benchmark for Large Language Models [paper]
Can Large Language Models Detect Errors in Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning? [paper]
FINEREASON: Evaluating and Improving LLMs' Deliberate Reasoning through Reflective Puzzle Solving [paper]
Part 11: Reasoning and Safety
Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning [Blog]
Deliberative Alignment: Reasoning Enables Safer Language Models [Paper]
OpenAI trained o1 and o3 to ‘think’ about its safety policy [Blog]
Why AI Safety Researchers Are Worried About DeepSeek [Blog]
OverThink: Slowdown Attacks on Reasoning LLMs [Paper]
GuardReasoner: Towards Reasoning-based LLM Safeguards [Paper]
SafeChain: Safety of Language Models with Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Capabilities [Paper]
ThinkGuard: Deliberative Slow Thinking Leads to Cautious Guardrails [Paper]
SafeChain: Safety of Language Models with Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Capabilities [Paper]
H-CoT: Hijacking the Chain-of-Thought Safety Reasoning Mechanism to Jailbreak Large Reasoning Models, Including OpenAI o1/o3, DeepSeek-R1, and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking [Paper]
BoT: Breaking Long Thought Processes of o1-like Large Language Models through Backdoor Attack [Paper]
The Hidden Risks of Large Reasoning Models: A Safety Assessment of R1 [Paper]
Illusory Safety: Redteaming DeepSeek R1 and the Strongest Fine-Tunable Models of OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google [Blog]
Safety Tax: Safety Alignment Makes Your Large Reasoning Models Less Reasonable [Paper]
DeepSeek-R1 Thoughtology: Let's about LLM Reasoning [Paper]
STAR-1: Safer Alignment of Reasoning LLMs with 1K Data [Paper]
Part 12: R1 Driven Multimodal Reasoning Enhancement
SoTA with Less: MCTS-Guided Sample Selection for Data-Efficient Visual Reasoning Self-Improvement [paper]
Perception-R1: Pioneering Perception Policy with Reinforcement Learning [paper]
VL-Rethinker: Incentivizing Self-Reflection of Vision-Language Models with Reinforcement Learning [paper]
Embodied-R: Collaborative Framework for Activating Embodied Spatial Reasoning in Foundation Models via Reinforcement Learning [paper]
NoisyRollout: Reinforcing Visual Reasoning with Data Augmentation [paper]
Citation
If you find this work useful, welcome to cite us.
@misc{li202512surveyreasoning,
title={From System 1 to System 2: A Survey of Reasoning Large Language Models},
author={Zhong-Zhi Li and Duzhen Zhang and Ming-Liang Zhang and Jiaxin Zhang and Zengyan Liu and Yuxuan Yao and Haotian Xu and Junhao Zheng and Pei-Jie Wang and Xiuyi Chen and Yingying Zhang and Fei Yin and Jiahua Dong and Zhijiang Guo and Le Song and Cheng-Lin Liu},
year={2025},
eprint={2502.17419},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.AI},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.17419},
}
Welcome to the repository for our survey paper, "From System 1 to System 2: A Survey of Reasoning Large Language Models". This repository provides resources and updates related to our research. For a detailed introduction, please refer to our survey paper.
Achieving human-level intelligence requires enhancing the transition from System 1 (fast, intuitive) to System 2 (slow, deliberate) reasoning. While foundational Large Language Models (LLMs) have made significant strides, they still fall short of human-like reasoning in complex tasks. Recent reasoning LLMs, like OpenAI’s o1, have demonstrated expert-level performance in domains such as mathematics and coding, resembling System 2 thinking. This survey explores the development of reasoning LLMs, their foundational technologies, benchmarks, and future directions. We maintain an up-to-date GitHub repository to track the latest developments in this rapidly evolving field.
This image highlights the progression of AI systems, emphasizing the shift from rapid, intuitive approaches to deliberate, reasoning-driven models. It shows how AI has evolved to handle a broader range of real-world challenges.
The recent timeline of reasoning LLMs, covering core methods and the release of open-source and closed-source reproduction projects.
ThinkBench: Dynamic Out-of-Distribution Evaluation for Robust LLM Reasoning [paper]
ProBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models in Competitive Programming [paper]
ZebraLogic: On the Scaling Limits of LLMs for Logical Reasoning [paper]
DivIL: Unveiling and Addressing Over-Invariance for Out-of-Distribution Generalization [paper]
QuestBench: Can LLMs ask the right question to acquire information in reasoning tasks? [paper]
Benchmarking Reasoning Robustness in Large Language Models [paper]
Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models: Assessing Logical and Arithmetic Errors across Wide Numerical Ranges [paper]
Inference-Time Computations for LLM Reasoning and Planning: A Benchmark and Insights [paper]
Rewardbench: Evaluating reward models for language modeling [paper]
Evaluating LLMs at Detecting Errors in LLM Responses [paper]
CriticBench: Benchmarking LLMs for Critique-Correct Reasoning [paper]
Judgebench: A benchmark for evaluating llm-based judges [paper]
Errorradar: Benchmarking complex mathematical reasoning of multimodal large language models via error detection [paper]
Processbench: Identifying process errors in mathematical reasoning [paper]
Medec: A benchmark for medical error detection and correction in clinical notes [paper]
CodeCriticBench: A Holistic Code Critique Benchmark for Large Language Models [paper]
Can Large Language Models Detect Errors in Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning? [paper]
FINEREASON: Evaluating and Improving LLMs' Deliberate Reasoning through Reflective Puzzle Solving [paper]
Part 11: Reasoning and Safety
Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning [Blog]
Deliberative Alignment: Reasoning Enables Safer Language Models [Paper]
OpenAI trained o1 and o3 to ‘think’ about its safety policy [Blog]
Why AI Safety Researchers Are Worried About DeepSeek [Blog]
OverThink: Slowdown Attacks on Reasoning LLMs [Paper]
GuardReasoner: Towards Reasoning-based LLM Safeguards [Paper]
SafeChain: Safety of Language Models with Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Capabilities [Paper]
ThinkGuard: Deliberative Slow Thinking Leads to Cautious Guardrails [Paper]
SafeChain: Safety of Language Models with Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Capabilities [Paper]
H-CoT: Hijacking the Chain-of-Thought Safety Reasoning Mechanism to Jailbreak Large Reasoning Models, Including OpenAI o1/o3, DeepSeek-R1, and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking [Paper]
BoT: Breaking Long Thought Processes of o1-like Large Language Models through Backdoor Attack [Paper]
The Hidden Risks of Large Reasoning Models: A Safety Assessment of R1 [Paper]
Illusory Safety: Redteaming DeepSeek R1 and the Strongest Fine-Tunable Models of OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google [Blog]
Safety Tax: Safety Alignment Makes Your Large Reasoning Models Less Reasonable [Paper]
DeepSeek-R1 Thoughtology: Let's about LLM Reasoning [Paper]
STAR-1: Safer Alignment of Reasoning LLMs with 1K Data [Paper]
Part 12: R1 Driven Multimodal Reasoning Enhancement
SoTA with Less: MCTS-Guided Sample Selection for Data-Efficient Visual Reasoning Self-Improvement [paper]
Perception-R1: Pioneering Perception Policy with Reinforcement Learning [paper]
VL-Rethinker: Incentivizing Self-Reflection of Vision-Language Models with Reinforcement Learning [paper]
Embodied-R: Collaborative Framework for Activating Embodied Spatial Reasoning in Foundation Models via Reinforcement Learning [paper]
NoisyRollout: Reinforcing Visual Reasoning with Data Augmentation [paper]
Citation
If you find this work useful, welcome to cite us.
@misc{li202512surveyreasoning,
title={From System 1 to System 2: A Survey of Reasoning Large Language Models},
author={Zhong-Zhi Li and Duzhen Zhang and Ming-Liang Zhang and Jiaxin Zhang and Zengyan Liu and Yuxuan Yao and Haotian Xu and Junhao Zheng and Pei-Jie Wang and Xiuyi Chen and Yingying Zhang and Fei Yin and Jiahua Dong and Zhijiang Guo and Le Song and Cheng-Lin Liu},
year={2025},
eprint={2502.17419},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.AI},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.17419},
}