A curated list of papers, datasets, and resources for AI-Generated Image Detection
25
21 commits
updated Mar 30, 2026
A curated and comprehensive list of papers, datasets, and resources for AI-Generated Image Detection (AIGC Detection). This collection covers methods for detecting images synthesized by GANs, diffusion models, autoregressive models, and other generative approaches.
Continuously updated.
Last verified: 2026-03-16 | Total papers: 170+ | Inclusion criteria: Peer-reviewed papers (CVPR, ICCV, ECCV, NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, AAAI) and high-impact arXiv preprints on AI-generated image detection. Preference for methods providing open-source code.
Awesome AIGC Image Detection
│
├── 1. CLIP / Vision-Language Methods
│ ├── 1.1 CLIP Fine-tuning (CLIPping, Raising the Bar, DeeCLIP, ForgeLens)
│ ├── 1.2 Prompt & Language-Guided (AntifakePrompt, PLOT, FatFormer, IAPL)
│ ├── 1.3 Feature Decoupling & Fusion (NS-Net, CausalCLIP, CLIPMoLE, CO-SPY)
│ └── 1.4 Information Bottleneck (VIB, MCIB)
│
├── 2. Reconstruction-based Methods
│ ├── 2.1 Diffusion Reconstruction (DIRE, DRCT, LATTE)
│ ├── 2.2 Autoencoder Reconstruction (AEROBLADE, GRRE, CINEMAE)
│ ├── 2.3 Latent Space (LaRE², FakeInversion)
│ └── 2.4 Semantic-Aware (SARE, Exposing the Fake)
│
├── 3. Frequency-domain Methods
│ ├── Spectral Analysis (Fractal Self-Similarity, SPAI, Spectral Artifacts)
│ ├── Color / Demosaicing (Secret Lies in Color, Color Matters)
│ └── Fourier / DCT (Fourier Spectrum Discrepancies)
│
├── 4. Patch / Texture-based Methods
│ ├── Patch Learning (SSP, PatchCraft, Panoptic Patch)
│ └── Texture Analysis (TextureCrop, Breaking Semantic Artifacts)
│
├── 5. Low-level Artifact Detection
│ ├── Up-sampling Artifact (NPR)
│ ├── Pixel-level (FerretNet, PiD, Pixel-level Mapping)
│ ├── Entropy / Bit-plane (MLEP, LOTA)
│ └── Noise / Fingerprint (Implicit Noise Imprint, FingerprintNet)
│
├── 6. Perturbation / Robustness-based Methods
│ ├── Perturbation (RIGID, RA-Det, DEnD)
│ ├── Uncertainty (WePe)
│ └── Distribution Fitting (ConV)
│
├── 7. LMM / Reasoning-based Methods
│ ├── Grounding & Explanation (LEGION, AIGI-Holmes, FakeReasoning)
│ ├── Multi-modal Detection (ThinkFake, Spot the Fake, SIDA)
│ └── VLM-based (Veritas, FakeShield, FAKEXPLAIN)
│
├── 8. Zero-shot & Training-free Methods
│ ├── Training-free (RIGID, WaRPAD, HFI, AEROBLADE, ConV)
│ └── Zero-shot (Forensic Self-Descriptions, Cozzolino, Beyond Generation)
│
├── 9. Diffusion-specific Detection
│ ├── Reconstruction Error (DIRE, AEROBLADE, LaRE², FIRE, DRCT, FakeInversion)
│ └── Probabilistic / Trajectory (Diffusion Epistemic Uncertainty, Corvi 2022)
│
├── 10. Autoregressive Model Detection (PRADA, D³QE, Data Provenance)
│
├── 11. Deepfake Detection (D³, Veritas, Real-Time Deepfake)
│
├── 12. Generalization: Training Strategy & Data Engineering
│ ├── Data Alignment (Dual Alignment, AlignedForensics, B-Free)
│ ├── Real-Centric & Calibration (MIRROR, Stay-Positive, Calibrated)
│ └── Multi-Generator (Community Forensics, GAPL, Forensic-MoE)
│
└── 13. Image Attribution / Source Tracing
├── Model Attribution (LatentTracer, AEDR, OCC-CLIP)
└── AR Attribution (PRADA, Data Provenance)
Representative methods with open-source code:
Widely-used benchmarks and evaluation frameworks in this field:
| Benchmark | Description | Year | Code |
|---|---|---|---|
| ForenSynths | Standard test benchmark with images from 11 GAN-based generators | 2020 | GitHub |
| UniversalFakeDetect | 19 generators spanning GANs and diffusion models | 2023 | GitHub |
| GenImage | Million-scale benchmark covering 8 generators | 2023 | GitHub |
| Synthbuster | Diffusion-generated images for detection benchmarking | 2023 | Paper |
| Chameleon | Human-hard scenarios for sanity-check evaluation | 2025 | GitHub |
| DRCT-2M | 2M images from 16 diffusion models for universal detection | 2024 | ModelScope |
| Aligned Forensics | Real images paired with their LDM autoencoder reconstructions, removing spurious correlations for training more generalizable detectors | 2025 | GitHub |
| FakeInversion | Images from 14 unseen text-to-image models via inversion, for evaluating generalization to unseen generators | 2024 | Page |
| CO-SPYBench | 22 generators + 50k wild images | 2025 | GitHub |
| Community Forensics | 4803 generators for large-scale generalization | 2025 | GitHub |
| ForensicHub | Unified benchmark & codebase for AIGC detection | 2025 | GitHub |
Training StrategyMulti-GeneratorPrompt LearningLatentBenchmarkLMMLMMPatchPatchMulti-GeneratorRobustnessAR / AttributionDeepfakeLMMAttributionCalibrationPixel-levelFeature FusionLMMSpotlight Training-freeTraining-freeTraining-freePerturbationUncertaintySpotlight Training StrategyEntropyPixelBias-FreeLMMLMMCLIPBit-planeMulti-Generator MoEReconstructionAutoregressiveBenchmarkDiffusionAnalysisFew-shotCLIPTraining StrategyLMMReconstructionFrequencyTraining StrategyCLIPReconstructionColorMulti-GeneratorLMMFeature FusionTraining StrategyZero-shotZero-shotTraining StrategyBenchmark Feature FusionBenchmarkLMMZero-shotContrastiveCLIPTextureReconstructionReconstructionReconstructionFrequencyAdaptationAttributionReconstructionReconstructionCLIPGradientReal-OnlyFingerprintDiffusionCNN ForensicsFrequencyFrequencyFrequencyReal-OnlyTraining StrategyPerturbationTraining StrategyCLIPPromptPatchCLIPBiasLeverage CLIP or other vision-language models whose pre-trained features already encode subtle generative artifacts, enabling strong cross-generator generalization with minimal fine-tuning.
Adapt CLIP's visual encoder via linear probes, LoRA, or lightweight adapters to extract forgery-discriminative features with minimal parameter updates.
CLIPCLIPCLIPCLIPCLIPCLIPCLIPSteer CLIP's representation via learnable prompts or language-guided objectives rather than weight adaptation, enabling few-shot domain transfer.
PromptLanguage-GuidedPromptPromptDecompose or fuse heterogeneous features—semantic, frequency, pixel-level—to separate forgery clues from content and improve cross-domain robustness.
CLIPCLIPCLIPFeature FusionFeature FusionFeature FusionApply information bottleneck principles to compress away content and retain only detection-relevant signals, improving robustness to distribution shift.
CLIPCLIPDetect AI-generated images by measuring how well a pre-trained generative model can reconstruct them—synthetic images yield lower error than real ones.
Compute reconstruction errors via DDIM inversion or latent trajectory encoding under a fixed diffusion model.
ReconstructionReconstructionReconstructionReconstructionExploit VAE or MAE encoder–decoder reconstruction error, which is near-zero for in-distribution generated images but elevated for real ones.
ReconstructionReconstructionReconstructionReconstructionWork in the compressed latent space of a diffusion VAE, using inversion residuals as detection signals.
ReconstructionReconstructionCondition reconstruction errors on semantic content to better disentangle generation artifacts from content-related variation.
ReconstructionReconstructionExploit spectral artifacts—fractal self-similarity, missing high-frequency fall-off, color demosaicing inconsistencies—left by generative pipelines in the frequency domain.
FrequencyFrequencyFrequencyFrequencyColorColorFrequencyExtract and compare local patch-level texture features—noise residuals, texture contrast, patch-contrastive signals—to expose synthetic origin independent of semantic content.
PatchPatchPatchTextureTexturePixelArchitectureDetect fine-grained pixel-level artifacts—upsampling patterns, local pixel dependencies, bit-plane anomalies, entropy deviations—that are architecture-agnostic byproducts of the generation pipeline.
Up-sampling ArtifactPixelPixelPixelEntropyBit-planeFingerprintPerceptualZero-shotFeature FusionExploit the asymmetric response of real vs. synthetic images to controlled perturbations—real images are more stable on the natural manifold, while generated images deviate more.
PerturbationPerturbationPerturbationUncertaintyPerturbationPerturbationTraining-freeRobustnessLeverage large multimodal models to provide not just binary detection but also artifact localization, reasoning, and natural-language explanations of why an image is fake.
LMMLMMLMMLMMLMMLMMLMMLMMLMMLMMLMMLMMRequire no training on fake data—exploit intrinsic properties of pre-trained models (reconstruction error, feature distributions, perturbation response) to detect without any task-specific optimization, naturally generalizing to unseen generators.
RIGID: A Training-free and Model-Agnostic Framework for Robust AI-Generated Image Detection | He et al. 2024 | Training-free
Intermediate Representations Are Strong Training-Free AI-Generated Image Detectors | Training-free
Training-Free AI-Generated Image Detection via Spectral Artifacts | Training-free
Forensic Self-Descriptions Are All You Need for Zero-Shot Detection, Open-Set Source Attribution, and Localization | Nguyen et al. | CVPR 2025 | Zero-shot
Zero-Shot Detection of AI-Generated Images | Cozzolino et al. | ECCV 2024 | Zero-shot
Detecting Generated Images by Fitting Natural Image Distributions | Zhang et al. | NeurIPS 2025 Spotlight | Code | Training-free
General and Domain-Specific Zero-shot Detection of Generated Images via Conditional Likelihood | Betser et al. 2025 | Zero-shot
Training-free Detection of AI-generated images via Cropping Robustness | Choi et al. | Code | Training-free
Denoising Trajectory Biases for Zero-Shot AI-Generated Image Detection | Liang et al. | Training-free
Revisiting Reconstruction-based AI-generated Image Detection: A Geometric Perspective | Jiang et al. 2025 | Training-free
HFI: A Unified Framework for Training-free Detection and Implicit Watermarking of Latent Diffusion Models | Choi et al. 2024 | Training-free
Understanding and Improving Training-Free AI-Generated Image Detections with Vision Foundation Models | Tsai et al. 2024 | Training-free
Core mechanism exploits DDIM inversion, VAE reconstruction, or denoising trajectories specific to diffusion models—would not transfer to GANs or AR generators.
DiffusionDiffusion Training-freeDiffusionDiffusionDiffusionDiffusionDiffusionDiffusionDiffusionTarget the unique artifacts of token-by-token autoregressive generation—discrete quantization errors and conditional token probability patterns.
AutoregressiveAutoregressiveAR / AttributionFace deepfake methods that also generalize to general AI-generated image detection benchmarks.
Deepfake + GeneralLMM + DeepfakeDeepfakeAddress the generalization gap through training data engineering—bias elimination, semantic alignment, multi-generator scaling, and calibration.
Eliminate spurious dataset biases (JPEG quality, resolution, content mismatch) by constructing semantically aligned real–fake training pairs.
Data AlignmentData AlignmentBias-FreeBias-FreeData AlignmentData AlignmentRegularizationFocus on the real-image manifold and calibration rather than fake data engineering—classify anything that deviates as synthetic.
Real-CentricCalibrationReal-CentricTest-Time AdaptationScale training to thousands of generative models, empirically showing monotonic generalization improvement with generator diversity.
Multi-GeneratorMulti-GeneratorMulti-GeneratorMulti-GeneratorGo beyond binary detection to identify which generative model produced an image, exploiting model-specific reconstruction fingerprints and latent signatures.
AttributionAttributionAttributionAttributionAttributionIf you find this repository useful, please consider citing:
@misc{awesome-aigc-image-detection,
title={Awesome AI-Generated Image Detection},
author={yjtlab},
year={2026},
publisher={GitHub},
howpublished={\url{https://github.com/yjtlab/awesome-aigc-image-detection}}
}
Last Updated: 2026-03-16 | Total Papers: 170+
Contributions and suggestions are welcome! Please open an issue or pull request.
21 commits
A curated list of papers, datasets, and resources for AI-Generated Image Detection
25
21 commits
updated Mar 30, 2026
A curated and comprehensive list of papers, datasets, and resources for AI-Generated Image Detection (AIGC Detection). This collection covers methods for detecting images synthesized by GANs, diffusion models, autoregressive models, and other generative approaches.
Continuously updated.
Last verified: 2026-03-16 | Total papers: 170+ | Inclusion criteria: Peer-reviewed papers (CVPR, ICCV, ECCV, NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, AAAI) and high-impact arXiv preprints on AI-generated image detection. Preference for methods providing open-source code.
Awesome AIGC Image Detection
│
├── 1. CLIP / Vision-Language Methods
│ ├── 1.1 CLIP Fine-tuning (CLIPping, Raising the Bar, DeeCLIP, ForgeLens)
│ ├── 1.2 Prompt & Language-Guided (AntifakePrompt, PLOT, FatFormer, IAPL)
│ ├── 1.3 Feature Decoupling & Fusion (NS-Net, CausalCLIP, CLIPMoLE, CO-SPY)
│ └── 1.4 Information Bottleneck (VIB, MCIB)
│
├── 2. Reconstruction-based Methods
│ ├── 2.1 Diffusion Reconstruction (DIRE, DRCT, LATTE)
│ ├── 2.2 Autoencoder Reconstruction (AEROBLADE, GRRE, CINEMAE)
│ ├── 2.3 Latent Space (LaRE², FakeInversion)
│ └── 2.4 Semantic-Aware (SARE, Exposing the Fake)
│
├── 3. Frequency-domain Methods
│ ├── Spectral Analysis (Fractal Self-Similarity, SPAI, Spectral Artifacts)
│ ├── Color / Demosaicing (Secret Lies in Color, Color Matters)
│ └── Fourier / DCT (Fourier Spectrum Discrepancies)
│
├── 4. Patch / Texture-based Methods
│ ├── Patch Learning (SSP, PatchCraft, Panoptic Patch)
│ └── Texture Analysis (TextureCrop, Breaking Semantic Artifacts)
│
├── 5. Low-level Artifact Detection
│ ├── Up-sampling Artifact (NPR)
│ ├── Pixel-level (FerretNet, PiD, Pixel-level Mapping)
│ ├── Entropy / Bit-plane (MLEP, LOTA)
│ └── Noise / Fingerprint (Implicit Noise Imprint, FingerprintNet)
│
├── 6. Perturbation / Robustness-based Methods
│ ├── Perturbation (RIGID, RA-Det, DEnD)
│ ├── Uncertainty (WePe)
│ └── Distribution Fitting (ConV)
│
├── 7. LMM / Reasoning-based Methods
│ ├── Grounding & Explanation (LEGION, AIGI-Holmes, FakeReasoning)
│ ├── Multi-modal Detection (ThinkFake, Spot the Fake, SIDA)
│ └── VLM-based (Veritas, FakeShield, FAKEXPLAIN)
│
├── 8. Zero-shot & Training-free Methods
│ ├── Training-free (RIGID, WaRPAD, HFI, AEROBLADE, ConV)
│ └── Zero-shot (Forensic Self-Descriptions, Cozzolino, Beyond Generation)
│
├── 9. Diffusion-specific Detection
│ ├── Reconstruction Error (DIRE, AEROBLADE, LaRE², FIRE, DRCT, FakeInversion)
│ └── Probabilistic / Trajectory (Diffusion Epistemic Uncertainty, Corvi 2022)
│
├── 10. Autoregressive Model Detection (PRADA, D³QE, Data Provenance)
│
├── 11. Deepfake Detection (D³, Veritas, Real-Time Deepfake)
│
├── 12. Generalization: Training Strategy & Data Engineering
│ ├── Data Alignment (Dual Alignment, AlignedForensics, B-Free)
│ ├── Real-Centric & Calibration (MIRROR, Stay-Positive, Calibrated)
│ └── Multi-Generator (Community Forensics, GAPL, Forensic-MoE)
│
└── 13. Image Attribution / Source Tracing
├── Model Attribution (LatentTracer, AEDR, OCC-CLIP)
└── AR Attribution (PRADA, Data Provenance)
Representative methods with open-source code:
Widely-used benchmarks and evaluation frameworks in this field:
| Benchmark | Description | Year | Code |
|---|---|---|---|
| ForenSynths | Standard test benchmark with images from 11 GAN-based generators | 2020 | GitHub |
| UniversalFakeDetect | 19 generators spanning GANs and diffusion models | 2023 | GitHub |
| GenImage | Million-scale benchmark covering 8 generators | 2023 | GitHub |
| Synthbuster | Diffusion-generated images for detection benchmarking | 2023 | Paper |
| Chameleon | Human-hard scenarios for sanity-check evaluation | 2025 | GitHub |
| DRCT-2M | 2M images from 16 diffusion models for universal detection | 2024 | ModelScope |
| Aligned Forensics | Real images paired with their LDM autoencoder reconstructions, removing spurious correlations for training more generalizable detectors | 2025 | GitHub |
| FakeInversion | Images from 14 unseen text-to-image models via inversion, for evaluating generalization to unseen generators | 2024 | Page |
| CO-SPYBench | 22 generators + 50k wild images | 2025 | GitHub |
| Community Forensics | 4803 generators for large-scale generalization | 2025 | GitHub |
| ForensicHub | Unified benchmark & codebase for AIGC detection | 2025 | GitHub |
Training StrategyMulti-GeneratorPrompt LearningLatentBenchmarkLMMLMMPatchPatchMulti-GeneratorRobustnessAR / AttributionDeepfakeLMMAttributionCalibrationPixel-levelFeature FusionLMMSpotlight Training-freeTraining-freeTraining-freePerturbationUncertaintySpotlight Training StrategyEntropyPixelBias-FreeLMMLMMCLIPBit-planeMulti-Generator MoEReconstructionAutoregressiveBenchmarkDiffusionAnalysisFew-shotCLIPTraining StrategyLMMReconstructionFrequencyTraining StrategyCLIPReconstructionColorMulti-GeneratorLMMFeature FusionTraining StrategyZero-shotZero-shotTraining StrategyBenchmark Feature FusionBenchmarkLMMZero-shotContrastiveCLIPTextureReconstructionReconstructionReconstructionFrequencyAdaptationAttributionReconstructionReconstructionCLIPGradientReal-OnlyFingerprintDiffusionCNN ForensicsFrequencyFrequencyFrequencyReal-OnlyTraining StrategyPerturbationTraining StrategyCLIPPromptPatchCLIPBiasLeverage CLIP or other vision-language models whose pre-trained features already encode subtle generative artifacts, enabling strong cross-generator generalization with minimal fine-tuning.
Adapt CLIP's visual encoder via linear probes, LoRA, or lightweight adapters to extract forgery-discriminative features with minimal parameter updates.
CLIPCLIPCLIPCLIPCLIPCLIPCLIPSteer CLIP's representation via learnable prompts or language-guided objectives rather than weight adaptation, enabling few-shot domain transfer.
PromptLanguage-GuidedPromptPromptDecompose or fuse heterogeneous features—semantic, frequency, pixel-level—to separate forgery clues from content and improve cross-domain robustness.
CLIPCLIPCLIPFeature FusionFeature FusionFeature FusionApply information bottleneck principles to compress away content and retain only detection-relevant signals, improving robustness to distribution shift.
CLIPCLIPDetect AI-generated images by measuring how well a pre-trained generative model can reconstruct them—synthetic images yield lower error than real ones.
Compute reconstruction errors via DDIM inversion or latent trajectory encoding under a fixed diffusion model.
ReconstructionReconstructionReconstructionReconstructionExploit VAE or MAE encoder–decoder reconstruction error, which is near-zero for in-distribution generated images but elevated for real ones.
ReconstructionReconstructionReconstructionReconstructionWork in the compressed latent space of a diffusion VAE, using inversion residuals as detection signals.
ReconstructionReconstructionCondition reconstruction errors on semantic content to better disentangle generation artifacts from content-related variation.
ReconstructionReconstructionExploit spectral artifacts—fractal self-similarity, missing high-frequency fall-off, color demosaicing inconsistencies—left by generative pipelines in the frequency domain.
FrequencyFrequencyFrequencyFrequencyColorColorFrequencyExtract and compare local patch-level texture features—noise residuals, texture contrast, patch-contrastive signals—to expose synthetic origin independent of semantic content.
PatchPatchPatchTextureTexturePixelArchitectureDetect fine-grained pixel-level artifacts—upsampling patterns, local pixel dependencies, bit-plane anomalies, entropy deviations—that are architecture-agnostic byproducts of the generation pipeline.
Up-sampling ArtifactPixelPixelPixelEntropyBit-planeFingerprintPerceptualZero-shotFeature FusionExploit the asymmetric response of real vs. synthetic images to controlled perturbations—real images are more stable on the natural manifold, while generated images deviate more.
PerturbationPerturbationPerturbationUncertaintyPerturbationPerturbationTraining-freeRobustnessLeverage large multimodal models to provide not just binary detection but also artifact localization, reasoning, and natural-language explanations of why an image is fake.
LMMLMMLMMLMMLMMLMMLMMLMMLMMLMMLMMLMMRequire no training on fake data—exploit intrinsic properties of pre-trained models (reconstruction error, feature distributions, perturbation response) to detect without any task-specific optimization, naturally generalizing to unseen generators.
RIGID: A Training-free and Model-Agnostic Framework for Robust AI-Generated Image Detection | He et al. 2024 | Training-free
Intermediate Representations Are Strong Training-Free AI-Generated Image Detectors | Training-free
Training-Free AI-Generated Image Detection via Spectral Artifacts | Training-free
Forensic Self-Descriptions Are All You Need for Zero-Shot Detection, Open-Set Source Attribution, and Localization | Nguyen et al. | CVPR 2025 | Zero-shot
Zero-Shot Detection of AI-Generated Images | Cozzolino et al. | ECCV 2024 | Zero-shot
Detecting Generated Images by Fitting Natural Image Distributions | Zhang et al. | NeurIPS 2025 Spotlight | Code | Training-free
General and Domain-Specific Zero-shot Detection of Generated Images via Conditional Likelihood | Betser et al. 2025 | Zero-shot
Training-free Detection of AI-generated images via Cropping Robustness | Choi et al. | Code | Training-free
Denoising Trajectory Biases for Zero-Shot AI-Generated Image Detection | Liang et al. | Training-free
Revisiting Reconstruction-based AI-generated Image Detection: A Geometric Perspective | Jiang et al. 2025 | Training-free
HFI: A Unified Framework for Training-free Detection and Implicit Watermarking of Latent Diffusion Models | Choi et al. 2024 | Training-free
Understanding and Improving Training-Free AI-Generated Image Detections with Vision Foundation Models | Tsai et al. 2024 | Training-free
Core mechanism exploits DDIM inversion, VAE reconstruction, or denoising trajectories specific to diffusion models—would not transfer to GANs or AR generators.
DiffusionDiffusion Training-freeDiffusionDiffusionDiffusionDiffusionDiffusionDiffusionDiffusionTarget the unique artifacts of token-by-token autoregressive generation—discrete quantization errors and conditional token probability patterns.
AutoregressiveAutoregressiveAR / AttributionFace deepfake methods that also generalize to general AI-generated image detection benchmarks.
Deepfake + GeneralLMM + DeepfakeDeepfakeAddress the generalization gap through training data engineering—bias elimination, semantic alignment, multi-generator scaling, and calibration.
Eliminate spurious dataset biases (JPEG quality, resolution, content mismatch) by constructing semantically aligned real–fake training pairs.
Data AlignmentData AlignmentBias-FreeBias-FreeData AlignmentData AlignmentRegularizationFocus on the real-image manifold and calibration rather than fake data engineering—classify anything that deviates as synthetic.
Real-CentricCalibrationReal-CentricTest-Time AdaptationScale training to thousands of generative models, empirically showing monotonic generalization improvement with generator diversity.
Multi-GeneratorMulti-GeneratorMulti-GeneratorMulti-GeneratorGo beyond binary detection to identify which generative model produced an image, exploiting model-specific reconstruction fingerprints and latent signatures.
AttributionAttributionAttributionAttributionAttributionIf you find this repository useful, please consider citing:
@misc{awesome-aigc-image-detection,
title={Awesome AI-Generated Image Detection},
author={yjtlab},
year={2026},
publisher={GitHub},
howpublished={\url{https://github.com/yjtlab/awesome-aigc-image-detection}}
}
Last Updated: 2026-03-16 | Total Papers: 170+
Contributions and suggestions are welcome! Please open an issue or pull request.
21 commits