Official GitHub repository for paper "SAKURA: On the Multi-hop Reasoning of Large Audio-Language Models Based on Speech and Audio Information" (Interspeech 2025)
See the code
TL;DR: We propose SAKURA, a benchmark for LALM multi-hop reasoning, and reveal their deficiency of such reasoning skills.
Large audio-language models (LALMs) extend the large language models with multimodal understanding in speech, audio, etc. While their performances on speech and audio-processing tasks are extensively studied, their reasoning abilities remain underexplored. Particularly, their multi-hop reasoning, the ability to recall and integrate multiple facts, lacks systematic evaluation. Existing benchmarks focus on general speech and audio-processing tasks, conversational abilities, and fairness but overlook this aspect. To bridge this gap, we introduce SAKURA, a benchmark assessing LALMs’ multi-hop reasoning based on speech and audio information. Results show that LALMs struggle to integrate speech/audio representations for multi-hop reasoning, even when they extract the relevant information correctly, highlighting a fundamental challenge in multimodal reasoning. Our findings expose a critical limitation in LALMs, offering insights and resources for future research.
🌟 Key findings
Here are the baseline models we included in the paper. The implementations were based on the official ones.
LTU-AS
GAMA-IT
SALMONN
DeSTA2
Qwen-Audio-Chat
Qwen2-Audio-Instruct
GPT-4o Audio
Gemini-1.5-flash and Gemini-1.5-pro
SAKURA uses the LLM-as-a-judge approach for automatic evaluation. We provide the evaluation code, models, and prompts in the evaluation/ directory. For more details on how to evaluate your models with SAKURA, please refer to this directory.
Here is the leaderboard of SAKURA, which currently only contain the baseline LALMs in the paper.
| Model | Size | Gender | Language | Emotion | Animal | Average | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single | Multi | Single | Multi | Single | Multi | Single | Multi | Single | Multi | ||
| LTU-AS | 7B | 52.4 | 19.6 | 16.8 | 11.4 | 28.6 | 19.6 | 65.6 | 21.8 | 40.9 | 18.1 |
| GAMA-IT | 7B | 76.4 | 39.8 | 5.6 | 19.4 | 5.6 | 24.2 | 85.2 | 51.4 | 43.2 | 33.7 |
| SALMONN | 7.5B | 59.8 | 48.6 | 21.8 | 29.6 | 19.8 | 28.2 | 68.6 | 34.6 | 42.5 | 35.3 |
| DeSTA2 | 8.3B | 88.4 | 85.2 | 94.2 | 75.4 | 34.8 | 36.4 | 34.4 | 31.2 | 63.0 | 57.1 |
| Qwen-Audio-Chat | 8.4B | 49.6 | 43.8 | 87.6 | 40.6 | 63.2 | 37.0 | 92.2 | 66.0 | 73.2 | 46.9 |
| Qwen2-Audio-Instruct | 8.4B | 88.0 | 47.2 | 83.8 | 48.0 | 64.2 | 39.8 | 88.8 | 61.4 | 81.2 | 49.1 |
| GPT-4o Audio | - | - | - | 95.2 | 83.6 | 38.2 | 23.8 | 80.6 | 55.4 | 71.3 | 54.3 |
| Gemini-1.5-flash | - | 77.0 | 24.2 | 98.2 | 79.8 | 24.6 | 19.4 | 27.2 | 16.2 | 56.8 | 34.9 |
| Gemini-1.5-pro | - | 74.0 | 43.4 | 97.2 | 90.6 | 39.2 | 24.0 | 42.0 | 28.6 | 63.1 | 46.6 |
We sincerely invite you to participate in SAKURA! Here are the steps on how to join this:
data/ and generate predictions with your models. It is recommended to save the predictions in the format specified in evaluation/ so that the evaluation code can be used directly without significant modifications.evaluation/. We highly recommend using the LLM evaluator and the prompts provided in evaluation/ to ensure consistency in evaluation.If you find SAKURA helpful for your research, please consider to cite our paper.
@article{yang2025sakuramultihopreasoninglarge,
title={SAKURA: On the Multi-hop Reasoning of Large Audio-Language Models Based on Speech and Audio Information},
author={Chih-Kai Yang and Neo Ho and Yen-Ting Piao and Hung-yi Lee},
year={2025},
eprint={2505.13237},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={eess.AS},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.13237},
}
16 commits
Python
100.0%
Official GitHub repository for paper "SAKURA: On the Multi-hop Reasoning of Large Audio-Language Models Based on Speech and Audio Information" (Interspeech 2025)
See the code
TL;DR: We propose SAKURA, a benchmark for LALM multi-hop reasoning, and reveal their deficiency of such reasoning skills.
Large audio-language models (LALMs) extend the large language models with multimodal understanding in speech, audio, etc. While their performances on speech and audio-processing tasks are extensively studied, their reasoning abilities remain underexplored. Particularly, their multi-hop reasoning, the ability to recall and integrate multiple facts, lacks systematic evaluation. Existing benchmarks focus on general speech and audio-processing tasks, conversational abilities, and fairness but overlook this aspect. To bridge this gap, we introduce SAKURA, a benchmark assessing LALMs’ multi-hop reasoning based on speech and audio information. Results show that LALMs struggle to integrate speech/audio representations for multi-hop reasoning, even when they extract the relevant information correctly, highlighting a fundamental challenge in multimodal reasoning. Our findings expose a critical limitation in LALMs, offering insights and resources for future research.
🌟 Key findings
Here are the baseline models we included in the paper. The implementations were based on the official ones.
LTU-AS
GAMA-IT
SALMONN
DeSTA2
Qwen-Audio-Chat
Qwen2-Audio-Instruct
GPT-4o Audio
Gemini-1.5-flash and Gemini-1.5-pro
SAKURA uses the LLM-as-a-judge approach for automatic evaluation. We provide the evaluation code, models, and prompts in the evaluation/ directory. For more details on how to evaluate your models with SAKURA, please refer to this directory.
Here is the leaderboard of SAKURA, which currently only contain the baseline LALMs in the paper.
| Model | Size | Gender | Language | Emotion | Animal | Average | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single | Multi | Single | Multi | Single | Multi | Single | Multi | Single | Multi | ||
| LTU-AS | 7B | 52.4 | 19.6 | 16.8 | 11.4 | 28.6 | 19.6 | 65.6 | 21.8 | 40.9 | 18.1 |
| GAMA-IT | 7B | 76.4 | 39.8 | 5.6 | 19.4 | 5.6 | 24.2 | 85.2 | 51.4 | 43.2 | 33.7 |
| SALMONN | 7.5B | 59.8 | 48.6 | 21.8 | 29.6 | 19.8 | 28.2 | 68.6 | 34.6 | 42.5 | 35.3 |
| DeSTA2 | 8.3B | 88.4 | 85.2 | 94.2 | 75.4 | 34.8 | 36.4 | 34.4 | 31.2 | 63.0 | 57.1 |
| Qwen-Audio-Chat | 8.4B | 49.6 | 43.8 | 87.6 | 40.6 | 63.2 | 37.0 | 92.2 | 66.0 | 73.2 | 46.9 |
| Qwen2-Audio-Instruct | 8.4B | 88.0 | 47.2 | 83.8 | 48.0 | 64.2 | 39.8 | 88.8 | 61.4 | 81.2 | 49.1 |
| GPT-4o Audio | - | - | - | 95.2 | 83.6 | 38.2 | 23.8 | 80.6 | 55.4 | 71.3 | 54.3 |
| Gemini-1.5-flash | - | 77.0 | 24.2 | 98.2 | 79.8 | 24.6 | 19.4 | 27.2 | 16.2 | 56.8 | 34.9 |
| Gemini-1.5-pro | - | 74.0 | 43.4 | 97.2 | 90.6 | 39.2 | 24.0 | 42.0 | 28.6 | 63.1 | 46.6 |
We sincerely invite you to participate in SAKURA! Here are the steps on how to join this:
data/ and generate predictions with your models. It is recommended to save the predictions in the format specified in evaluation/ so that the evaluation code can be used directly without significant modifications.evaluation/. We highly recommend using the LLM evaluator and the prompts provided in evaluation/ to ensure consistency in evaluation.If you find SAKURA helpful for your research, please consider to cite our paper.
@article{yang2025sakuramultihopreasoninglarge,
title={SAKURA: On the Multi-hop Reasoning of Large Audio-Language Models Based on Speech and Audio Information},
author={Chih-Kai Yang and Neo Ho and Yen-Ting Piao and Hung-yi Lee},
year={2025},
eprint={2505.13237},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={eess.AS},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.13237},
}
16 commits
Python
100.0%