Awsome of VLM-CL. Continual Learning for VLMs: A Survey and Taxonomy Beyond Forgetting
221
93 commits
updated Sep 4, 2026
A curated list of papers, codebases, and datasets for continual learning in vision-language models (VLMs) and Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), accompanying our survey paper. Last updated: 2026-08
If you find this repository or our survey useful for your research, please consider citing our work:
@article{liu2026continual,
title={Continual Learning for VLMs: A Survey and Taxonomy Beyond Forgetting},
author={Liu, Yuyang and Hong, Qiuhe and Huang, Linlan and Gomez-Villa, Alexandra and Goswami, Dipam and Liu, Xialei and van de Weijer, Joost and Tian, Yonghong},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.04227},
year={2026}
}
Vision-language models (VLMs) like CLIP have achieved remarkable success, but adapting them to evolving data streams without catastrophic forgetting is a critical challenge. This repository provides a systematic review of research on continual learning for VLMs (VLM-CL).
Our survey identifies three core failure modes in VLM-CL:
Based on these challenges, we propose a solution-driven taxonomy to categorize existing methods, which forms the structure for the paper list below. This repository serves as a community-driven hub for tracking state-of-the-art methods, datasets, and fostering collaboration.
Sorted chronologically (newest first).
Evaluating VLM-CL requires specialized benchmarks. As detailed in our survey, the landscape of benchmarks for vision-language continual learning has evolved into three tiers: Repurposed Unimodal, Adapted Multimodal, and Native VLM/MLLM-Specific benchmarks.
The tables below summarize all key datasets used in the literature according to this evolutionary taxonomy.
Adapted from traditional computer vision datasets. They offer scalability for evaluating catastrophic forgetting, but provide limited insights into cross-modal misalignment.
| Dataset | Task Type | Scenario | Modality | Size | Metrics | Link/Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDDB | Classification | DIL | Image | 50K | Accuracy | [Paper] |
| CORe50 | Classification | DIL | Video | 50K | Accuracy | [Paper] |
| DomainNet | Classification | DIL | Image | 600K | Accuracy | [Link] |
| Conceptual12M | Segmentation | CIL / IIL | Image+Text | 12M | IoU, AP | [Paper] |
| ImageNet-100/1K | Classification | CIL / DIL | Image | 130K-1.3M | Accuracy | [Link] |
| TinyImageNet | Classification | CIL | Image | 100K | Accuracy | [Paper] |
| CIFAR100 | Classification | CIL | Image | 60K | Accuracy | [Link] |
| CUB200 | Classification | CIL | Image | 11.7K | Accuracy | [Link] |
| CLEAR-10/100 | Classification | CIL / DIL | Image | 4.3M-18.6M | Accuracy | [Homepage] |
| ADE20K-CL | Segmentation | CIL | Image+Annotations | 25K | IoU | [Link] |
Reconfigured from existing multimodal datasets. These preserve cross-modal interactions while introducing continual learning protocols.
| Dataset | Task Type | Scenario | Modality | Size | Metrics | Link/Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDL-VQA | VQA | DIL | Image+Text | 150K | Accuracy | [Paper] |
| P9D | Retrieval | DIL / TIL | Image+Text | 1M+ | AP | [Paper] |
| Flickr30K | Retrieval | CIL | Image+Annotations | 30K | Accuracy | [Link] |
| ECommerce-T2I | Retrieval | CIL | Image+Annotations | 15K | Accuracy | [Paper] |
| NExT-QA | VQA | TIL | Videos+Text | 52K | AP | [GitHub] |
Explicitly designed to address cross-modal forgetting pathologies, zero-shot decay, compositional transfer, and instruction-tuning alignment.
| Dataset | Task Type | Scenario | Modality | Size | Metrics | Link/Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLiMB | VQA | TIL | Image+Text | 1.1M | Accuracy, F1 | [GitHub] |
| VQACL | VQA | TIL / DIL | Image+Text | 100K | Accuracy | [GitHub] |
| COCO-CL | Seg. / Ret. | CIL | Image+Annotations | 200K+ | AP, IoU, Acc. | [Paper] |
| TiC | Ret. / Class. | Time-IL | Image+Text | 127M/1B/12B | Acc., Recall | [Paper] |
| CoIN | VQA | TIL | Image+Text | 740K | Accuracy | [Paper] |
| UCIT | VQA | TIL | Image+Text | 231K | Accuracy | [Paper] |
| MLLM-CL | VQA | DIL / AIL | Image+Text | 392.7K/925K | Accuracy | [Paper] |
| MLLM-CTBench | VQA | TIL | Image+Text | 70K | Accuracy | [Paper] |
| CLeaRS | VQA | DIL / TIL | Image+Text | 207K | Accuracy | [GitHub] |
| ToS | VQA/Cap. | DIL | Image+Text | 935K | Accuracy | [Paper] |
| MTIL | Classification | TIL / CIL | Image | 438.3K | Accuracy | [Paper] |
| VTAB | Classification | CIL | Image | 10K | Accuracy | [Paper] |
| CLOVE | VQA | DIL / TIL | Image+Text | N/A | Accuracy | [Paper] |
| OMNI | Classification | CIL | Image | 1M+ | Accuracy | [Paper] |
| IMRE | RE | TIL | Image+Text | 9K | F1 | [GitHub] |
| IMNER | NER | TIL | Image+Text | 8.5K | F1 | [GitHub] |
Evaluating CL in VLMs necessitates a multifaceted approach that addresses both traditional CL desiderata and VLM-specific challenges (e.g., zero-shot generalization and cross-modal alignment). Key metrics discussed in our survey include:
Regarding the detailed computation of these evaluation metrics, we provide a clear and intuitive diagram (as shown below) in the paper for comprehensive explanation.
Based on the gaps and trends identified in our survey, we propose several key directions for future research:
📊 Unified and Holistic Benchmarking: Moving beyond simple classification accuracy to incorporate compositional zero-shot evaluation and temporal, web-scale data streams.
💬 Continual Learning for Generative and Interactive Tasks: Enabling multimodal chatbots and agents to continually learn from human feedback and long-term memory without losing alignment.
🤖 Continual Learning for Vision-Language-Action (VLA) Models: Transitioning to Embodied AI where cross-modal feature drift precipitates cascading physical failures, requiring skill-compositional strategies.
📐 Towards a Theoretical Understanding: Developing mathematical models for cross-modal feature drift and theoretical bounds for Parameter-Efficient Adaptation.
We welcome contributions! If you have a paper, dataset, or codebase that should be on this list, please open a Pull Request.
README.md. Please maintain the existing format.Acknowledgments: This repository builds on the incredible efforts of the open-source research community.
Awsome of VLM-CL. Continual Learning for VLMs: A Survey and Taxonomy Beyond Forgetting
221
93 commits
updated Sep 4, 2026
A curated list of papers, codebases, and datasets for continual learning in vision-language models (VLMs) and Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), accompanying our survey paper. Last updated: 2026-08
If you find this repository or our survey useful for your research, please consider citing our work:
@article{liu2026continual,
title={Continual Learning for VLMs: A Survey and Taxonomy Beyond Forgetting},
author={Liu, Yuyang and Hong, Qiuhe and Huang, Linlan and Gomez-Villa, Alexandra and Goswami, Dipam and Liu, Xialei and van de Weijer, Joost and Tian, Yonghong},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.04227},
year={2026}
}
Vision-language models (VLMs) like CLIP have achieved remarkable success, but adapting them to evolving data streams without catastrophic forgetting is a critical challenge. This repository provides a systematic review of research on continual learning for VLMs (VLM-CL).
Our survey identifies three core failure modes in VLM-CL:
Based on these challenges, we propose a solution-driven taxonomy to categorize existing methods, which forms the structure for the paper list below. This repository serves as a community-driven hub for tracking state-of-the-art methods, datasets, and fostering collaboration.
Sorted chronologically (newest first).
Evaluating VLM-CL requires specialized benchmarks. As detailed in our survey, the landscape of benchmarks for vision-language continual learning has evolved into three tiers: Repurposed Unimodal, Adapted Multimodal, and Native VLM/MLLM-Specific benchmarks.
The tables below summarize all key datasets used in the literature according to this evolutionary taxonomy.
Adapted from traditional computer vision datasets. They offer scalability for evaluating catastrophic forgetting, but provide limited insights into cross-modal misalignment.
| Dataset | Task Type | Scenario | Modality | Size | Metrics | Link/Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDDB | Classification | DIL | Image | 50K | Accuracy | [Paper] |
| CORe50 | Classification | DIL | Video | 50K | Accuracy | [Paper] |
| DomainNet | Classification | DIL | Image | 600K | Accuracy | [Link] |
| Conceptual12M | Segmentation | CIL / IIL | Image+Text | 12M | IoU, AP | [Paper] |
| ImageNet-100/1K | Classification | CIL / DIL | Image | 130K-1.3M | Accuracy | [Link] |
| TinyImageNet | Classification | CIL | Image | 100K | Accuracy | [Paper] |
| CIFAR100 | Classification | CIL | Image | 60K | Accuracy | [Link] |
| CUB200 | Classification | CIL | Image | 11.7K | Accuracy | [Link] |
| CLEAR-10/100 | Classification | CIL / DIL | Image | 4.3M-18.6M | Accuracy | [Homepage] |
| ADE20K-CL | Segmentation | CIL | Image+Annotations | 25K | IoU | [Link] |
Reconfigured from existing multimodal datasets. These preserve cross-modal interactions while introducing continual learning protocols.
| Dataset | Task Type | Scenario | Modality | Size | Metrics | Link/Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDL-VQA | VQA | DIL | Image+Text | 150K | Accuracy | [Paper] |
| P9D | Retrieval | DIL / TIL | Image+Text | 1M+ | AP | [Paper] |
| Flickr30K | Retrieval | CIL | Image+Annotations | 30K | Accuracy | [Link] |
| ECommerce-T2I | Retrieval | CIL | Image+Annotations | 15K | Accuracy | [Paper] |
| NExT-QA | VQA | TIL | Videos+Text | 52K | AP | [GitHub] |
Explicitly designed to address cross-modal forgetting pathologies, zero-shot decay, compositional transfer, and instruction-tuning alignment.
| Dataset | Task Type | Scenario | Modality | Size | Metrics | Link/Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLiMB | VQA | TIL | Image+Text | 1.1M | Accuracy, F1 | [GitHub] |
| VQACL | VQA | TIL / DIL | Image+Text | 100K | Accuracy | [GitHub] |
| COCO-CL | Seg. / Ret. | CIL | Image+Annotations | 200K+ | AP, IoU, Acc. | [Paper] |
| TiC | Ret. / Class. | Time-IL | Image+Text | 127M/1B/12B | Acc., Recall | [Paper] |
| CoIN | VQA | TIL | Image+Text | 740K | Accuracy | [Paper] |
| UCIT | VQA | TIL | Image+Text | 231K | Accuracy | [Paper] |
| MLLM-CL | VQA | DIL / AIL | Image+Text | 392.7K/925K | Accuracy | [Paper] |
| MLLM-CTBench | VQA | TIL | Image+Text | 70K | Accuracy | [Paper] |
| CLeaRS | VQA | DIL / TIL | Image+Text | 207K | Accuracy | [GitHub] |
| ToS | VQA/Cap. | DIL | Image+Text | 935K | Accuracy | [Paper] |
| MTIL | Classification | TIL / CIL | Image | 438.3K | Accuracy | [Paper] |
| VTAB | Classification | CIL | Image | 10K | Accuracy | [Paper] |
| CLOVE | VQA | DIL / TIL | Image+Text | N/A | Accuracy | [Paper] |
| OMNI | Classification | CIL | Image | 1M+ | Accuracy | [Paper] |
| IMRE | RE | TIL | Image+Text | 9K | F1 | [GitHub] |
| IMNER | NER | TIL | Image+Text | 8.5K | F1 | [GitHub] |
Evaluating CL in VLMs necessitates a multifaceted approach that addresses both traditional CL desiderata and VLM-specific challenges (e.g., zero-shot generalization and cross-modal alignment). Key metrics discussed in our survey include:
Regarding the detailed computation of these evaluation metrics, we provide a clear and intuitive diagram (as shown below) in the paper for comprehensive explanation.
Based on the gaps and trends identified in our survey, we propose several key directions for future research:
📊 Unified and Holistic Benchmarking: Moving beyond simple classification accuracy to incorporate compositional zero-shot evaluation and temporal, web-scale data streams.
💬 Continual Learning for Generative and Interactive Tasks: Enabling multimodal chatbots and agents to continually learn from human feedback and long-term memory without losing alignment.
🤖 Continual Learning for Vision-Language-Action (VLA) Models: Transitioning to Embodied AI where cross-modal feature drift precipitates cascading physical failures, requiring skill-compositional strategies.
📐 Towards a Theoretical Understanding: Developing mathematical models for cross-modal feature drift and theoretical bounds for Parameter-Efficient Adaptation.
We welcome contributions! If you have a paper, dataset, or codebase that should be on this list, please open a Pull Request.
README.md. Please maintain the existing format.Acknowledgments: This repository builds on the incredible efforts of the open-source research community.