zli12321/qa_metrics

An easy python package to run quick basic QA evaluations. This package includes standardized QA evaluation metrics and semantic evaluation metrics: Black-box and Open-Source large language model prompting and evaluation, exact match, F1 Score, PEDANT semantic match, transformer match. Our package also supports prompting OPENAI and Anthropic API.

Python

64

154 commits

updated Jul 18, 2025

See the code

README

QA-Evaluation-Metrics πŸ“Š

PyPI version qa-metrics Colab

A fast and lightweight Python package for evaluating question-answering models and prompting of black-box and open-source large language models.

pip install qa-metrics is all you need!

πŸ€— Huggingface Model and Dataset

Release Updates

  • Version 0.2.42 Released! (06/20/2025)

    • RewardBert (ModerBert base) supports batch scores prediction to speed up prediction for RL training.
  • Version 0.2.35 Released! (06/18/2025)

    • RewardBert (ModerBert base) trained to evaluate both short-form and long-form generations.
    • RewardBert outputs a likert scale between 1-5 or normalized score between 0-1.
    • Turn off nltk download verbose logs.
  • Version 0.2.30 Released!

    • Enhanced PEDANTS with multi-pipeline support and improved edge case handling
    • Introduced trained tiny-bert for QA evaluation (18MB model size)
    • Added direct Huggingface model download support for TransformerMatcher

πŸš€ Quick Start

Table of Contents

Prerequisites

  • Python >= 3.6
  • openai >= 1.0

Installation

pip install qa-metrics

πŸ’‘ Features

Our package offers six QA evaluation methods with varying strengths:

MethodBest ForCostCorrelation with Human Judgment
RewardBertGeneral Text GenerationsFreeVery High
Normalized Exact MatchShort-form QA (NQ-OPEN, HotpotQA, etc.)FreeGood
PEDANTSBoth short & medium-form QAFreeVery High
Neural EvaluationBoth short & long-form QAFreeHigh
Open Source LLM EvaluationAll QA typesFreeHigh
Black-box LLM EvaluationAll QA typesPaidHighest

πŸ“– Documentation

1. RewardBert

Method: compute_score

Parameters

  • reference_answer (str): gold (correct) answer to the question
  • candidate_answer (str): The answer provided by a candidate that needs to be evaluated

Returns

  • tuple: A tuple of normalized and raw scores.
from qa_metrics.RewardBert import RewardBert

rb = RewardBert(device='cuda')
reference_answer = "The Frog Prince"
candidate_answer = "The movie \"The Princess and the Frog\" is loosely based off the Brother Grimm's \"Iron Henry\""
rb.compute_score(reference_answer, candidate_answer)
# (0.29113227128982544, 2.1645290851593018)

Method: compute_batch_scores

Parameters

  • reference_answers (list of str): A list of gold (correct) answers to the question
  • candidate_answer (list of str): A list of answers provided by a candidate that needs to be evaluated
  • batch_size (int): batch size to predict (default 1)

Returns

  • tuple: A tuple of a list of normalized and raw scores.
from qa_metrics.RewardBert import RewardBert

rb = RewardBert(device='cuda')
reference_answer = ["The Frog Prince"]
candidate_answer = ["The movie \"The Princess and the Frog\" is loosely based off the Brother Grimm's \"Iron Henry\""]
rb.compute_batch_scores(reference_answer, candidate_answer, batch_size=1)
# ([0.29113227128982544], [2.1645290851593018])

2. Normalized Exact Match

Method: em_match

Parameters

  • reference_answer (list of str): A list of gold (correct) answers to the question
  • candidate_answer (str): The answer provided by a candidate that needs to be evaluated

Returns

  • boolean: True if there are any exact normalized matches between gold and candidate answers
from qa_metrics.em import em_match

reference_answer = ["The Frog Prince", "The Princess and the Frog"]
candidate_answer = "The movie \"The Princess and the Frog\" is loosely based off the Brother Grimm's \"Iron Henry\""
match_result = em_match(reference_answer, candidate_answer)

3. F1 Score

Method: f1_score_with_precision_recall

Parameters

  • reference_answer (str): A gold (correct) answer to the question
  • candidate_answer (str): The answer provided by a candidate that needs to be evaluated

Returns

  • dictionary: Contains the F1 score, precision, and recall between a gold and candidate answer

Method: f1_match

Parameters

  • reference_answer (list of str): List of gold answers
  • candidate_answer (str): Candidate answer to evaluate
  • threshold (float): F1 score threshold for considering a match (default: 0.5)

Returns

  • boolean: True if F1 score exceeds threshold for any gold answer
from qa_metrics.f1 import f1_match, f1_score_with_precision_recall

f1_stats = f1_score_with_precision_recall(reference_answer[0], candidate_answer)
match_result = f1_match(reference_answer, candidate_answer, threshold=0.5)

4. PEDANTS

Method: get_score

Parameters

  • reference_answer (str): A Gold answer
  • candidate_answer (str): Candidate answer to evaluate
  • question (str): The question being evaluated

Returns

  • float: The similarity score between two strings (0 to 1)

Method: get_highest_score

Parameters

  • reference_answer (list of str): List of gold answers
  • candidate_answer (str): Candidate answer to evaluate
  • question (str): The question being evaluated

Returns

  • dictionary: Contains the gold answer and candidate answer pair with highest matching score

Method: get_scores

Parameters

  • reference_answer (list of str): List of gold answers
  • candidate_answer (str): Candidate answer to evaluate
  • question (str): The question being evaluated

Returns

  • dictionary: Contains matching scores for all gold answer and candidate answer pairs

Method: evaluate

Parameters

  • reference_answer (list of str): List of gold answers
  • candidate_answer (str): Candidate answer to evaluate
  • question (str): The question being evaluated

Returns

  • boolean: True if candidate answer matches any gold answer

Method: get_question_type

Parameters

  • reference_answer (list of str): List of gold answers
  • question (str): The question being evaluated

Returns

  • list: The type of the question (what, who, when, how, why, which, where)

Method: get_judgement_type

Parameters

  • reference_answer (list of str): List of gold answers
  • candidate_answer (str): Candidate answer to evaluate
  • question (str): The question being evaluated

Returns

  • list: A list revised rules applicable to judge answer correctness
from qa_metrics.pedant import PEDANT

pedant = PEDANT()
scores = pedant.get_scores(reference_answer, candidate_answer, question)
match_result = pedant.evaluate(reference_answer, candidate_answer, question)

5. Transformer Neural Evaluation

Method: get_score

Parameters

  • reference_answer (str): A Gold answer
  • candidate_answer (str): Candidate answer to evaluate
  • question (str): The question being evaluated

Returns

  • float: The similarity score between two strings (0 to 1)

Method: get_highest_score

Parameters

  • reference_answer (list of str): List of gold answers
  • candidate_answer (str): Candidate answer to evaluate
  • question (str): The question being evaluated

Returns

  • dictionary: Contains the gold answer and candidate answer pair with highest matching score

Method: get_scores

Parameters

  • reference_answer (list of str): List of gold answers
  • candidate_answer (str): Candidate answer to evaluate
  • question (str): The question being evaluated

Returns

  • dictionary: Contains matching scores for all gold answer and candidate answer pairs

Method: transformer_match

Parameters

  • reference_answer (list of str): List of gold answers
  • candidate_answer (str): Candidate answer to evaluate
  • question (str): The question being evaluated

Returns

  • boolean: True if transformer model considers candidate answer equivalent to any gold answer
from qa_metrics.transformerMatcher import TransformerMatcher

### supports zli12321/roberta-large-qa-evaluator, `zli12321/answer_equivalence_bert`, `zli12321/answer_equivalence_distilbert`, `zli12321/answer_equivalence_roberta`, `zli12321/answer_equivalence_distilroberta`
tm = TransformerMatcher("zli12321/answer_equivalence_tiny_bert")
match_result = tm.transformer_match(reference_answer, candidate_answer, question)

6. LLM Integration

Method: prompt_gpt

Parameters

  • prompt (str): The input prompt text
  • model_engine (str): OpenAI model to use (e.g., 'gpt-3.5-turbo')
  • temperature (float): Controls randomness (0-1)
  • max_tokens (int): Maximum tokens in response
from qa_metrics.prompt_llm import CloseLLM

model = CloseLLM()
model.set_openai_api_key(YOUR_OPENAI_KEY)
result = model.prompt_gpt(prompt=prompt, model_engine='gpt-3.5-turbo')

Method: prompt_claude

Parameters

  • prompt (str): The input prompt text
  • model_engine (str): Claude model to use
  • anthropic_version (str): API version
  • max_tokens_to_sample (int): Maximum tokens in response
  • temperature (float): Controls randomness (0-1)
model = CloseLLM()
model.set_anthropic_api_key(YOUR_ANTHROPIC_KEY)
result = model.prompt_claude(prompt=prompt, model_engine='claude-v1')

Method: prompt

Parameters

  • message (str): The input message text
  • model_engine (str): Model to use
  • temperature (float): Controls randomness (0-1)
  • max_tokens (int): Maximum tokens in response
from qa_metrics.prompt_open_llm import OpenLLM

model = OpenLLM()
model.set_deepinfra_key(YOUR_DEEPINFRA_KEY)
result = model.prompt(message=prompt, model_engine='mistralai/Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1')

πŸ€— Model Hub

Our fine-tuned models are available on Huggingface:

πŸ“š Resources

πŸ“„ Citation

@misc{li2024pedantscheapeffectiveinterpretable,
      title={PEDANTS: Cheap but Effective and Interpretable Answer Equivalence}, 
      author={Zongxia Li and Ishani Mondal and Yijun Liang and Huy Nghiem and Jordan Lee Boyd-Graber},
      year={2024},
      eprint={2402.11161},
      archivePrefix={arXiv},
      primaryClass={cs.CL},
      url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.11161}, 
}

πŸ“ License

This project is licensed under the MIT License.

πŸ“¬ Contact

For questions or comments, please contact: [email protected]

exact-matching
llm
llm-evaluation
llm-evaluation-framework
llm-evaluation-toolkit
qa-automation-test
reward-modeling
rl-training

zli12321/qa_metrics

An easy python package to run quick basic QA evaluations. This package includes standardized QA evaluation metrics and semantic evaluation metrics: Black-box and Open-Source large language model prompting and evaluation, exact match, F1 Score, PEDANT semantic match, transformer match. Our package also supports prompting OPENAI and Anthropic API.

Python

64

154 commits

updated Jul 18, 2025

See the code

README

QA-Evaluation-Metrics πŸ“Š

PyPI version qa-metrics Colab

A fast and lightweight Python package for evaluating question-answering models and prompting of black-box and open-source large language models.

pip install qa-metrics is all you need!

πŸ€— Huggingface Model and Dataset

Release Updates

  • Version 0.2.42 Released! (06/20/2025)

    • RewardBert (ModerBert base) supports batch scores prediction to speed up prediction for RL training.
  • Version 0.2.35 Released! (06/18/2025)

    • RewardBert (ModerBert base) trained to evaluate both short-form and long-form generations.
    • RewardBert outputs a likert scale between 1-5 or normalized score between 0-1.
    • Turn off nltk download verbose logs.
  • Version 0.2.30 Released!

    • Enhanced PEDANTS with multi-pipeline support and improved edge case handling
    • Introduced trained tiny-bert for QA evaluation (18MB model size)
    • Added direct Huggingface model download support for TransformerMatcher

πŸš€ Quick Start

Table of Contents

Prerequisites

  • Python >= 3.6
  • openai >= 1.0

Installation

pip install qa-metrics

πŸ’‘ Features

Our package offers six QA evaluation methods with varying strengths:

MethodBest ForCostCorrelation with Human Judgment
RewardBertGeneral Text GenerationsFreeVery High
Normalized Exact MatchShort-form QA (NQ-OPEN, HotpotQA, etc.)FreeGood
PEDANTSBoth short & medium-form QAFreeVery High
Neural EvaluationBoth short & long-form QAFreeHigh
Open Source LLM EvaluationAll QA typesFreeHigh
Black-box LLM EvaluationAll QA typesPaidHighest

πŸ“– Documentation

1. RewardBert

Method: compute_score

Parameters

  • reference_answer (str): gold (correct) answer to the question
  • candidate_answer (str): The answer provided by a candidate that needs to be evaluated

Returns

  • tuple: A tuple of normalized and raw scores.
from qa_metrics.RewardBert import RewardBert

rb = RewardBert(device='cuda')
reference_answer = "The Frog Prince"
candidate_answer = "The movie \"The Princess and the Frog\" is loosely based off the Brother Grimm's \"Iron Henry\""
rb.compute_score(reference_answer, candidate_answer)
# (0.29113227128982544, 2.1645290851593018)

Method: compute_batch_scores

Parameters

  • reference_answers (list of str): A list of gold (correct) answers to the question
  • candidate_answer (list of str): A list of answers provided by a candidate that needs to be evaluated
  • batch_size (int): batch size to predict (default 1)

Returns

  • tuple: A tuple of a list of normalized and raw scores.
from qa_metrics.RewardBert import RewardBert

rb = RewardBert(device='cuda')
reference_answer = ["The Frog Prince"]
candidate_answer = ["The movie \"The Princess and the Frog\" is loosely based off the Brother Grimm's \"Iron Henry\""]
rb.compute_batch_scores(reference_answer, candidate_answer, batch_size=1)
# ([0.29113227128982544], [2.1645290851593018])

2. Normalized Exact Match

Method: em_match

Parameters

  • reference_answer (list of str): A list of gold (correct) answers to the question
  • candidate_answer (str): The answer provided by a candidate that needs to be evaluated

Returns

  • boolean: True if there are any exact normalized matches between gold and candidate answers
from qa_metrics.em import em_match

reference_answer = ["The Frog Prince", "The Princess and the Frog"]
candidate_answer = "The movie \"The Princess and the Frog\" is loosely based off the Brother Grimm's \"Iron Henry\""
match_result = em_match(reference_answer, candidate_answer)

3. F1 Score

Method: f1_score_with_precision_recall

Parameters

  • reference_answer (str): A gold (correct) answer to the question
  • candidate_answer (str): The answer provided by a candidate that needs to be evaluated

Returns

  • dictionary: Contains the F1 score, precision, and recall between a gold and candidate answer

Method: f1_match

Parameters

  • reference_answer (list of str): List of gold answers
  • candidate_answer (str): Candidate answer to evaluate
  • threshold (float): F1 score threshold for considering a match (default: 0.5)

Returns

  • boolean: True if F1 score exceeds threshold for any gold answer
from qa_metrics.f1 import f1_match, f1_score_with_precision_recall

f1_stats = f1_score_with_precision_recall(reference_answer[0], candidate_answer)
match_result = f1_match(reference_answer, candidate_answer, threshold=0.5)

4. PEDANTS

Method: get_score

Parameters

  • reference_answer (str): A Gold answer
  • candidate_answer (str): Candidate answer to evaluate
  • question (str): The question being evaluated

Returns

  • float: The similarity score between two strings (0 to 1)

Method: get_highest_score

Parameters

  • reference_answer (list of str): List of gold answers
  • candidate_answer (str): Candidate answer to evaluate
  • question (str): The question being evaluated

Returns

  • dictionary: Contains the gold answer and candidate answer pair with highest matching score

Method: get_scores

Parameters

  • reference_answer (list of str): List of gold answers
  • candidate_answer (str): Candidate answer to evaluate
  • question (str): The question being evaluated

Returns

  • dictionary: Contains matching scores for all gold answer and candidate answer pairs

Method: evaluate

Parameters

  • reference_answer (list of str): List of gold answers
  • candidate_answer (str): Candidate answer to evaluate
  • question (str): The question being evaluated

Returns

  • boolean: True if candidate answer matches any gold answer

Method: get_question_type

Parameters

  • reference_answer (list of str): List of gold answers
  • question (str): The question being evaluated

Returns

  • list: The type of the question (what, who, when, how, why, which, where)

Method: get_judgement_type

Parameters

  • reference_answer (list of str): List of gold answers
  • candidate_answer (str): Candidate answer to evaluate
  • question (str): The question being evaluated

Returns

  • list: A list revised rules applicable to judge answer correctness
from qa_metrics.pedant import PEDANT

pedant = PEDANT()
scores = pedant.get_scores(reference_answer, candidate_answer, question)
match_result = pedant.evaluate(reference_answer, candidate_answer, question)

5. Transformer Neural Evaluation

Method: get_score

Parameters

  • reference_answer (str): A Gold answer
  • candidate_answer (str): Candidate answer to evaluate
  • question (str): The question being evaluated

Returns

  • float: The similarity score between two strings (0 to 1)

Method: get_highest_score

Parameters

  • reference_answer (list of str): List of gold answers
  • candidate_answer (str): Candidate answer to evaluate
  • question (str): The question being evaluated

Returns

  • dictionary: Contains the gold answer and candidate answer pair with highest matching score

Method: get_scores

Parameters

  • reference_answer (list of str): List of gold answers
  • candidate_answer (str): Candidate answer to evaluate
  • question (str): The question being evaluated

Returns

  • dictionary: Contains matching scores for all gold answer and candidate answer pairs

Method: transformer_match

Parameters

  • reference_answer (list of str): List of gold answers
  • candidate_answer (str): Candidate answer to evaluate
  • question (str): The question being evaluated

Returns

  • boolean: True if transformer model considers candidate answer equivalent to any gold answer
from qa_metrics.transformerMatcher import TransformerMatcher

### supports zli12321/roberta-large-qa-evaluator, `zli12321/answer_equivalence_bert`, `zli12321/answer_equivalence_distilbert`, `zli12321/answer_equivalence_roberta`, `zli12321/answer_equivalence_distilroberta`
tm = TransformerMatcher("zli12321/answer_equivalence_tiny_bert")
match_result = tm.transformer_match(reference_answer, candidate_answer, question)

6. LLM Integration

Method: prompt_gpt

Parameters

  • prompt (str): The input prompt text
  • model_engine (str): OpenAI model to use (e.g., 'gpt-3.5-turbo')
  • temperature (float): Controls randomness (0-1)
  • max_tokens (int): Maximum tokens in response
from qa_metrics.prompt_llm import CloseLLM

model = CloseLLM()
model.set_openai_api_key(YOUR_OPENAI_KEY)
result = model.prompt_gpt(prompt=prompt, model_engine='gpt-3.5-turbo')

Method: prompt_claude

Parameters

  • prompt (str): The input prompt text
  • model_engine (str): Claude model to use
  • anthropic_version (str): API version
  • max_tokens_to_sample (int): Maximum tokens in response
  • temperature (float): Controls randomness (0-1)
model = CloseLLM()
model.set_anthropic_api_key(YOUR_ANTHROPIC_KEY)
result = model.prompt_claude(prompt=prompt, model_engine='claude-v1')

Method: prompt

Parameters

  • message (str): The input message text
  • model_engine (str): Model to use
  • temperature (float): Controls randomness (0-1)
  • max_tokens (int): Maximum tokens in response
from qa_metrics.prompt_open_llm import OpenLLM

model = OpenLLM()
model.set_deepinfra_key(YOUR_DEEPINFRA_KEY)
result = model.prompt(message=prompt, model_engine='mistralai/Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1')

πŸ€— Model Hub

Our fine-tuned models are available on Huggingface:

πŸ“š Resources

πŸ“„ Citation

@misc{li2024pedantscheapeffectiveinterpretable,
      title={PEDANTS: Cheap but Effective and Interpretable Answer Equivalence}, 
      author={Zongxia Li and Ishani Mondal and Yijun Liang and Huy Nghiem and Jordan Lee Boyd-Graber},
      year={2024},
      eprint={2402.11161},
      archivePrefix={arXiv},
      primaryClass={cs.CL},
      url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.11161}, 
}

πŸ“ License

This project is licensed under the MIT License.

πŸ“¬ Contact

For questions or comments, please contact: [email protected]

exact-matching
llm
llm-evaluation
llm-evaluation-framework
llm-evaluation-toolkit
qa-automation-test
reward-modeling
rl-training

Project health

Latest release

0.2.42 Β· Jun 24, 2025

Releases this year

0

Significant stargazers

Chujun Song

19 followers Β· starred Apr 2024