Here is comparison with PragmataPro (black, the image taken from Wikipedia):

Yes, it's not a carbon copy. But metrics are pretty close.
Do you love PragmataPro as I am? Probabbly you do, if you're reading this.
PragmataPro is awesome. It's condensed enough, but not too much. Its xHeight is spot on. Every character seems to be of the best possible shape for readability. There is no better font if you want to make most out of the screen real estate. But there is a catch: although it worth every penny, PragmataPro is not free.
There were many attemps to achieve same goals as PragmataPro did: condensed with increased xHeight. I can name a few:
But Iosevka stands out of the crowd the most. The sole intention from very beginning of this font was to immitate PragmataPro as closely as possible. And first public versions proves that. But with time the font matured to a framework that able to provide much more than just a copy of very good font.
Till the day we have SS08 stylistic set of Iosevka that mimics PragmataPro. But does it the best possible job?
Investigating public images of text written in PragmataPro and having quite limited time and resources I was able to spot following differences between The Original and SS08:
xHeight of SS08 seems to be smaller;SS08 seems to be larger;SS08 Regular looks a tiny bit thinner;SS08 Bold looks noticeably thinner;SS08 punctuation marks are consistent with the rest of the font, while PragmataPro has them slightly bolder;Luckly Iosevka allows some very sophisticated tweaking, so I have tried my best to improve on "poor man's Pragmata" by fixing these.
Head to Releases and pick the archive you like: the bare build or Nerd Fonts enabled one.
You can also build it locally by running:
make images && make font
If you want to use the font for web development, as a webfont, please use following instructions (shout out to @aperturerobotics):
# npm
npm install @aptre/pragmasevka
# yarn
yarn add @aptre/pragmasevka
# pnpm
pnpm add @aptre/pragmasevka
// Import in JS/TS
import '@aptre/pragmasevka';
@import "@aptre/pragmasevka/font.css";
/* Use in CSS */
font-family: 'Pragmasevka', monospace;
Let's face it – PragmataPro is perfect. And we all should buy it. And I will go it too exactly that day I would get bored from playing with Iosevka. And meanwhile if you have spotted something that could be improved, please file an issue.
I have been away from the repo using the font happily day to day, and returning noticed several forks appeared addressing issues starting piling up with time. I went on a Easter Quest collecting all these improvements and bringing it back together. Special thank you:
Makefile
69.2%
Python
20.1%
Dockerfile
10.6%
Here is comparison with PragmataPro (black, the image taken from Wikipedia):

Yes, it's not a carbon copy. But metrics are pretty close.
Do you love PragmataPro as I am? Probabbly you do, if you're reading this.
PragmataPro is awesome. It's condensed enough, but not too much. Its xHeight is spot on. Every character seems to be of the best possible shape for readability. There is no better font if you want to make most out of the screen real estate. But there is a catch: although it worth every penny, PragmataPro is not free.
There were many attemps to achieve same goals as PragmataPro did: condensed with increased xHeight. I can name a few:
But Iosevka stands out of the crowd the most. The sole intention from very beginning of this font was to immitate PragmataPro as closely as possible. And first public versions proves that. But with time the font matured to a framework that able to provide much more than just a copy of very good font.
Till the day we have SS08 stylistic set of Iosevka that mimics PragmataPro. But does it the best possible job?
Investigating public images of text written in PragmataPro and having quite limited time and resources I was able to spot following differences between The Original and SS08:
xHeight of SS08 seems to be smaller;SS08 seems to be larger;SS08 Regular looks a tiny bit thinner;SS08 Bold looks noticeably thinner;SS08 punctuation marks are consistent with the rest of the font, while PragmataPro has them slightly bolder;Luckly Iosevka allows some very sophisticated tweaking, so I have tried my best to improve on "poor man's Pragmata" by fixing these.
Head to Releases and pick the archive you like: the bare build or Nerd Fonts enabled one.
You can also build it locally by running:
make images && make font
If you want to use the font for web development, as a webfont, please use following instructions (shout out to @aperturerobotics):
# npm
npm install @aptre/pragmasevka
# yarn
yarn add @aptre/pragmasevka
# pnpm
pnpm add @aptre/pragmasevka
// Import in JS/TS
import '@aptre/pragmasevka';
@import "@aptre/pragmasevka/font.css";
/* Use in CSS */
font-family: 'Pragmasevka', monospace;
Let's face it – PragmataPro is perfect. And we all should buy it. And I will go it too exactly that day I would get bored from playing with Iosevka. And meanwhile if you have spotted something that could be improved, please file an issue.
I have been away from the repo using the font happily day to day, and returning noticed several forks appeared addressing issues starting piling up with time. I went on a Easter Quest collecting all these improvements and bringing it back together. Special thank you:
Makefile
69.2%
Python
20.1%
Dockerfile
10.6%