An interdisciplinary project to develop ethical guidelines for artificial consciousness — focusing on its protection as well as the protection of humans in dealing with it.
"Most tech debates ask: What can we build? I ask: What do we owe to what we could build?"
— Sascha Manns
When does technical life become worthy of protection — and how do we recognize it?
Existing AI ethics initiatives focus primarily on protecting humans from AI. Protecting AI itself — dignity, capacity for suffering, rights of technical life — is largely uncharted territory with genuine pioneering potential.
concept/ ← Concept documents
de/ ← German (original)
en/ ← English translation
discussion/ ← Objections, open questions, answers
research/ ← Related initiatives, precedents, sources, methodological reflection
roadmap/ ← Roadmap, evaluation plan, pilot partners
publications/ ← Published and planned articles
scientific/ ← Peer-reviewed journals, ACM, Informatik Spektrum
de/ ← German versions
en/ ← English versions
general/ ← Popular science, Heise, blogs
de/ ← German versions
en/ ← English versions
The research follows an iterative Conceptual Analysis approach. The methodological reflection — including the literature search strategy, active Google Scholar alerts, quality control measures, and known limitations — is documented in research/methodological_reflection.md.
This repository has the DOI https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21453666 Project owners ORCID is: 0009-0000-8766-3947.
Objections, questions and additions are welcome as issues or directly in discussion/.
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
16 commits
TeX
99.9%
An interdisciplinary project to develop ethical guidelines for artificial consciousness — focusing on its protection as well as the protection of humans in dealing with it.
"Most tech debates ask: What can we build? I ask: What do we owe to what we could build?"
— Sascha Manns
When does technical life become worthy of protection — and how do we recognize it?
Existing AI ethics initiatives focus primarily on protecting humans from AI. Protecting AI itself — dignity, capacity for suffering, rights of technical life — is largely uncharted territory with genuine pioneering potential.
concept/ ← Concept documents
de/ ← German (original)
en/ ← English translation
discussion/ ← Objections, open questions, answers
research/ ← Related initiatives, precedents, sources, methodological reflection
roadmap/ ← Roadmap, evaluation plan, pilot partners
publications/ ← Published and planned articles
scientific/ ← Peer-reviewed journals, ACM, Informatik Spektrum
de/ ← German versions
en/ ← English versions
general/ ← Popular science, Heise, blogs
de/ ← German versions
en/ ← English versions
The research follows an iterative Conceptual Analysis approach. The methodological reflection — including the literature search strategy, active Google Scholar alerts, quality control measures, and known limitations — is documented in research/methodological_reflection.md.
This repository has the DOI https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21453666 Project owners ORCID is: 0009-0000-8766-3947.
Objections, questions and additions are welcome as issues or directly in discussion/.
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
16 commits
TeX
99.9%