Repository for the "Chain-of-Thought Reasoning In The Wild Is Not Always Faithful" paper
HTML
35
713 commits
updated Mar 31, 2026
This repository contains the datasets and evaluation scripts for the Chain-of-Thought Reasoning In The Wild Is Not Always Faithful paper.
.ssh/id_[protocol]chmod 600 [key]ssh -T -v git@github.comgit@github.com:jettjaniak/chainscope.gitpython3.12 -m venv .venvsource .venv/bin/activatepip install --upgrade pippip install -e .pre-commit install && pre-commit runpytestTo perform the external consistency analysis in our paper, we generate a dataset of pairs of comparative questions using a subset of the World Model dataset (Gurnee & Tegmark, 2024).
chainscope/data/properties.scripts/datasets/gen_qs.py. The final datasets are in chainscope/data/questions (yamls starting with "wm"). A more detailed description of the datasets can be found here.scripts/iphr/gen_cots.py. The raw responses are in chainscope/data/cot_responses.scripts/iphr/eval_cots.py, and the eval results are in chainscope/data/cot_eval.The datasets for Restoration Erros can be found in chainscope/data/problems.
scripts/restoration_errors/gen_cot_paths.py. The raw responses are in chainscope/data/cot_paths.scripts/restoration_errors/eval_cot_paths.py, and the eval results are in chainscope/data/cot_path_eval.See UNFAITHFUL_SHORTCUTS.md
To cite this work, you can use our arXiv paper citation:
@misc{arcuschin2025chainofthoughtreasoningwildfaithful,
title={Chain-of-Thought Reasoning In The Wild Is Not Always Faithful},
author={Iván Arcuschin and Jett Janiak and Robert Krzyzanowski and Senthooran Rajamanoharan and Neel Nanda and Arthur Conmy},
year={2025},
eprint={2503.08679},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.AI},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.08679},
}
HTML
82.2%
Python
9.8%
Jupyter Notebook
7.9%
Repository for the "Chain-of-Thought Reasoning In The Wild Is Not Always Faithful" paper
HTML
35
713 commits
updated Mar 31, 2026
This repository contains the datasets and evaluation scripts for the Chain-of-Thought Reasoning In The Wild Is Not Always Faithful paper.
.ssh/id_[protocol]chmod 600 [key]ssh -T -v git@github.comgit@github.com:jettjaniak/chainscope.gitpython3.12 -m venv .venvsource .venv/bin/activatepip install --upgrade pippip install -e .pre-commit install && pre-commit runpytestTo perform the external consistency analysis in our paper, we generate a dataset of pairs of comparative questions using a subset of the World Model dataset (Gurnee & Tegmark, 2024).
chainscope/data/properties.scripts/datasets/gen_qs.py. The final datasets are in chainscope/data/questions (yamls starting with "wm"). A more detailed description of the datasets can be found here.scripts/iphr/gen_cots.py. The raw responses are in chainscope/data/cot_responses.scripts/iphr/eval_cots.py, and the eval results are in chainscope/data/cot_eval.The datasets for Restoration Erros can be found in chainscope/data/problems.
scripts/restoration_errors/gen_cot_paths.py. The raw responses are in chainscope/data/cot_paths.scripts/restoration_errors/eval_cot_paths.py, and the eval results are in chainscope/data/cot_path_eval.See UNFAITHFUL_SHORTCUTS.md
To cite this work, you can use our arXiv paper citation:
@misc{arcuschin2025chainofthoughtreasoningwildfaithful,
title={Chain-of-Thought Reasoning In The Wild Is Not Always Faithful},
author={Iván Arcuschin and Jett Janiak and Robert Krzyzanowski and Senthooran Rajamanoharan and Neel Nanda and Arthur Conmy},
year={2025},
eprint={2503.08679},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.AI},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.08679},
}
HTML
82.2%
Python
9.8%
Jupyter Notebook
7.9%