Model Card for joelito/legal-swiss-longformer-base
0
11 commits
2 linked in READMEs
updated Oct 25, 2023
This model is based on XLM-R-Base. It was pretrained on negation scope resolution using NegBERT (Khandelwal and Sawant 2020) For training we used the Multi Legal Neg Dataset, a multilingual dataset of legal data annotated for negation cues and scopes, ConanDoyle-neg ( Morante and Blanco. 2012), SFU Review (Konstantinova et al. 2012), BioScope (Szarvas et al. 2008) and Dalloux (Dalloux et al. 2020).
See LegalNegBERT for details on the training process and how to use this model.
Users (both direct and downstream) should be made aware of the risks, biases and limitations of the model.
This model was pretrained on the Multi Legal Neg Dataset
We evaluate neg-xlm-roberta-base on the test sets in the Multi Legal Neg Dataset.
| _Test Dataset | F1-score |
|---|---|
| fr | 92.49 |
| it | 88.81 |
| de (DE) | 95.66 |
| de (CH) | 87.82 |
| SFU Review | 88.53 |
| ConanDoyle-neg | 90.47 |
| BioScope | 95.59 |
| Dalloux | 93.99 |
pytorch, transformers.
Please cite the following preprint:
@misc{christen2023resolving,
title={Resolving Legalese: A Multilingual Exploration of Negation Scope Resolution in Legal Documents},
author={Ramona Christen and Anastassia Shaitarova and Matthias Stürmer and Joel Niklaus},
year={2023},
eprint={2309.08695},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.CL}
}
Model Card for joelito/legal-swiss-longformer-base
0
11 commits
2 linked in READMEs
updated Oct 25, 2023
This model is based on XLM-R-Base. It was pretrained on negation scope resolution using NegBERT (Khandelwal and Sawant 2020) For training we used the Multi Legal Neg Dataset, a multilingual dataset of legal data annotated for negation cues and scopes, ConanDoyle-neg ( Morante and Blanco. 2012), SFU Review (Konstantinova et al. 2012), BioScope (Szarvas et al. 2008) and Dalloux (Dalloux et al. 2020).
See LegalNegBERT for details on the training process and how to use this model.
Users (both direct and downstream) should be made aware of the risks, biases and limitations of the model.
This model was pretrained on the Multi Legal Neg Dataset
We evaluate neg-xlm-roberta-base on the test sets in the Multi Legal Neg Dataset.
| _Test Dataset | F1-score |
|---|---|
| fr | 92.49 |
| it | 88.81 |
| de (DE) | 95.66 |
| de (CH) | 87.82 |
| SFU Review | 88.53 |
| ConanDoyle-neg | 90.47 |
| BioScope | 95.59 |
| Dalloux | 93.99 |
pytorch, transformers.
Please cite the following preprint:
@misc{christen2023resolving,
title={Resolving Legalese: A Multilingual Exploration of Negation Scope Resolution in Legal Documents},
author={Ramona Christen and Anastassia Shaitarova and Matthias Stürmer and Joel Niklaus},
year={2023},
eprint={2309.08695},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.CL}
}