This repository contains the latest tactic generator model checkpoint from BFS-Prover, a state-of-the-art theorem proving system in Lean4. While the full BFS-Prover system integrates multiple components for scalable theorem proving, we are releasing the core tactic generation model here. Given a proof state in Lean4, the model generates a tactic that transforms the current proof state into a new state, progressively working towards completing the proof.
26
27 commits
2 linked in READMEs
updated Oct 14, 2025
This repository contains the latest tactic generator model checkpoint from BFS-Prover, a state-of-the-art theorem proving system in Lean4. While the full BFS-Prover system integrates multiple components for scalable theorem proving, we are releasing the core tactic generation model here. Given a proof state in Lean4, the model generates a tactic that transforms the current proof state into a new state, progressively working towards completing the proof.
π Paper: BFS-Prover: Scalable Best-First Tree Search for LLM-based Automatic Theorem Proving
π» Code: GitHub Repository
BFS-Prover achieves state-of-the-art performance on the MiniF2F test benchmark. Here's a detailed comparison:
| Prover System | Search Method | Critic Model | Tactic Budget | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BFS-Prover | BFS | No | Accumulative | 72.95% |
| BFS-Prover | BFS | No | 2048Γ2Γ600 | 70.83% Β± 0.89% |
| HunyuanProver | BFS | Yes | 600Γ8Γ400 | 68.4% |
| InternLM2.5-StepProver | BFS | Yes | 256Γ32Γ600 | 65.9% |
| DeepSeek-Prover-V1.5 | MCTS | No | 32Γ16Γ400 | 63.5% |
"{state}:::"::: serves as a special indicator to signal the model to generate a tactic for the given state.# Example code for loading and using the tactic generator model
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("bytedance-research/BFS-Prover")
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("bytedance-research/BFS-Prover")
state = "h : x = y + 2 β’ x - 1 = y + 1"
sep = ":::"
prompt = state + sep # Creates "h : x = y + 2 β’ x - 1 = y + 1:::"
inputs = tokenizer(prompt, return_tensors="pt")
outputs = model.generate(**inputs)
tactic = tokenizer.decode(outputs[0], skip_special_tokens=True).split(sep)[1]
print(tactic)
# Complete example:
# Input state: "h : x = y + 2 β’ x - 1 = y + 1"
# Full prompt: "h : x = y + 2 β’ x - 1 = y + 1:::"
# Model output: "h : x = y + 2 β’ x - 1 = y + 1:::simp [h]"
# Final tactic: "simp [h]"
If you use this model in your research, please cite our paper:
@article{xin2025bfs,
title={BFS-Prover: Scalable Best-First Tree Search for LLM-based Automatic Theorem Proving},
author={Xin, Ran and Xi, Chenguang and Yang, Jie and Chen, Feng and Wu, Hang and Xiao, Xia and Sun, Yifan and Zheng, Shen and Shen, Kai},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.03438},
year={2025}
}
https://choosealicense.com/licenses/apache-2.0/
For questions and feedback about the tactic generator model, please contact:
26 commits
1 commits
This repository contains the latest tactic generator model checkpoint from BFS-Prover, a state-of-the-art theorem proving system in Lean4. While the full BFS-Prover system integrates multiple components for scalable theorem proving, we are releasing the core tactic generation model here. Given a proof state in Lean4, the model generates a tactic that transforms the current proof state into a new state, progressively working towards completing the proof.
26
27 commits
2 linked in READMEs
updated Oct 14, 2025
This repository contains the latest tactic generator model checkpoint from BFS-Prover, a state-of-the-art theorem proving system in Lean4. While the full BFS-Prover system integrates multiple components for scalable theorem proving, we are releasing the core tactic generation model here. Given a proof state in Lean4, the model generates a tactic that transforms the current proof state into a new state, progressively working towards completing the proof.
π Paper: BFS-Prover: Scalable Best-First Tree Search for LLM-based Automatic Theorem Proving
π» Code: GitHub Repository
BFS-Prover achieves state-of-the-art performance on the MiniF2F test benchmark. Here's a detailed comparison:
| Prover System | Search Method | Critic Model | Tactic Budget | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BFS-Prover | BFS | No | Accumulative | 72.95% |
| BFS-Prover | BFS | No | 2048Γ2Γ600 | 70.83% Β± 0.89% |
| HunyuanProver | BFS | Yes | 600Γ8Γ400 | 68.4% |
| InternLM2.5-StepProver | BFS | Yes | 256Γ32Γ600 | 65.9% |
| DeepSeek-Prover-V1.5 | MCTS | No | 32Γ16Γ400 | 63.5% |
"{state}:::"::: serves as a special indicator to signal the model to generate a tactic for the given state.# Example code for loading and using the tactic generator model
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("bytedance-research/BFS-Prover")
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("bytedance-research/BFS-Prover")
state = "h : x = y + 2 β’ x - 1 = y + 1"
sep = ":::"
prompt = state + sep # Creates "h : x = y + 2 β’ x - 1 = y + 1:::"
inputs = tokenizer(prompt, return_tensors="pt")
outputs = model.generate(**inputs)
tactic = tokenizer.decode(outputs[0], skip_special_tokens=True).split(sep)[1]
print(tactic)
# Complete example:
# Input state: "h : x = y + 2 β’ x - 1 = y + 1"
# Full prompt: "h : x = y + 2 β’ x - 1 = y + 1:::"
# Model output: "h : x = y + 2 β’ x - 1 = y + 1:::simp [h]"
# Final tactic: "simp [h]"
If you use this model in your research, please cite our paper:
@article{xin2025bfs,
title={BFS-Prover: Scalable Best-First Tree Search for LLM-based Automatic Theorem Proving},
author={Xin, Ran and Xi, Chenguang and Yang, Jie and Chen, Feng and Wu, Hang and Xiao, Xia and Sun, Yifan and Zheng, Shen and Shen, Kai},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.03438},
year={2025}
}
https://choosealicense.com/licenses/apache-2.0/
For questions and feedback about the tactic generator model, please contact:
26 commits
1 commits