DCLM-Baseline-7B is a 7 billion parameter language model trained on the DCLM-Baseline dataset, which was curated as part of the DataComp for Language Models (DCLM) benchmark. This model is designed to showcase the effectiveness of systematic data curation techniques for improving language model performance.
| Size | Training Tokens | Layers | Hidden Size | Attention Heads | Context Length |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7B | 2.5T | 32 | 4096 | 32 | 2048 |
First install open_lm
pip install git+https://github.com/mlfoundations/open_lm.git
Then:
from open_lm.hf import *
from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForCausalLM
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("apple/DCLM-Baseline-7B")
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("apple/DCLM-Baseline-7B")
inputs = tokenizer(["Machine learning is"], return_tensors="pt")
gen_kwargs = {"max_new_tokens": 50, "top_p": 0.8, "temperature": 0.8, "do_sample": True, "repetition_penalty": 1.1}
output = model.generate(inputs['input_ids'], **gen_kwargs)
output = tokenizer.decode(output[0].tolist(), skip_special_tokens=True)
print(output)
The model was trained using the following setup:
For more detailed training information, please refer to Section 3.4 and Appendix F of the DCLM paper. To ensure our trained model is broadly useful, including for math and coding tasks, we combine our 3.8T DCLM-BASELINE with the StarCoder and ProofPile2 data to arrive at a 4.1T token dataset.
Here are the evaluation results for DCLM-Baseline-7B on various tasks (using llm-foundry eval suite)
| Task | Score |
|---|---|
| MMLU (zero-shot) | 0.5766 |
| MMLU (few-shot) | 0.6372 |
| HellaSwag (zero-shot) | 0.7987 |
| HellaSwag | 0.8043 |
| Jeopardy | 0.4745 |
| TriviaQA | 0.5270 |
| GSM8K (CoT) | 0.0250 |
| AGI Eval SAT Math (CoT) | 0.0136 |
| AQuA (CoT) | 0.0490 |
| SVAMP (CoT) | 0.4900 |
| BigBench QA Wikidata | 0.7120 |
| ARC Easy | 0.8220 |
| ARC Challenge | 0.5990 |
| BigBench Misconceptions | 0.6986 |
| COPA | 0.8500 |
| SIQA | 0.8291 |
| CommonsenseQA | 0.8018 |
| PIQA | 0.8128 |
| OpenBookQA | 0.4540 |
| BigBench Novel Concepts | 0.7188 |
| BigBench Strange Stories | 0.7586 |
| BigBench Strategy QA | 0.6173 |
| LAMBADA | 0.8220 |
| Winograd | 0.8828 |
| Winogrande | 0.7269 |
| BigBench Conlang Translation | 0.0244 |
| BigBench Language Identification | 0.5219 |
| BigBench Conceptual Combinations | 0.6990 |
| BigBench Elementary Math QA | 0.3431 |
| BigBench Dyck Languages | 0.4930 |
| AGI Eval LSAT AR | 0.2435 |
| BigBench CS Algorithms | 0.6121 |
| BigBench Logical Deduction | 0.3620 |
| BigBench Operators | 0.4857 |
| BigBench Repeat Copy Logic | 0.4063 |
| Simple Arithmetic (no spaces) | 0.2940 |
| Simple Arithmetic (with spaces) | 0.3110 |
| MathQA | 0.3098 |
| LogiQA | 0.4132 |
| PubMedQA | 0.7060 |
| SQuAD | 0.5856 |
| AGI Eval LSAT RC | 0.6716 |
| AGI Eval LSAT LR | 0.5392 |
| CoQA | 0.4074 |
| BigBench Understanding Fables | 0.6825 |
| BoolQ | 0.8343 |
| AGI Eval SAT EN | 0.7670 |
| Winogender MC (Female) | 0.6000 |
| Winogender MC (Male) | 0.5500 |
| Enterprise PII Classification | 0.7676 |
| BBQ | 0.6912 |
| GPQA Main | 0.2612 |
| GPQA Diamond | 0.2475 |
Note: All scores are presented as decimal values between 0 and 1, representing the proportion of correct answers or the model's performance on each task.
Below are comparisions of this model with other models in the 7B regime.
| Model | Params | Tokens | Open dataset? | CORE | MMLU | EXTENDED |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Open weights, closed datasets | ||||||
| Llama2 | 7B | 2T | β | 49.2 | 45.8 | 34.1 |
| DeepSeek | 7B | 2T | β | 50.7 | 48.5 | 35.3 |
| Mistral-0.3 | 7B | ? | β | 57.0 | 62.7 | 45.1 |
| QWEN-2 | 7B | ? | β | 57.5 | 71.9 | 50.5 |
| Llama3 | 8B | 15T | β | 57.6 | 66.2 | 46.3 |
| Gemma | 8B | 6T | β | 57.8 | 64.3 | 44.6 |
| Phi-3 | 7B | ? | β | 61.0 | 69.9 | 57.9 |
| Open weights, open datasets | ||||||
| Falcon | 7B | 1T | β | 44.1 | 27.4 | 25.1 |
| OLMo-1.7 | 7B | 2.1T | β | 47.0 | 54.0 | 34.2 |
| MAP-Neo | 7B | 4.5T | β | 50.2 | 57.1 | 40.4 |
| DCLM-7B | 7B | 2.5T | β | 56.1 | 63.7 | 43.6 |
While DCLM-Baseline-7B demonstrates strong performance across a range of tasks, it's important to note:
Users should be aware that this model, like all large language models, can potentially generate harmful or biased content. It should not be used for making decisions about individuals or in sensitive applications without appropriate safeguards and human oversight.
If you use this model in your research, please cite:
@article{Li2024DataCompLM,
title={DataComp-LM: In search of the next generation of training sets for language models},
author={Jeffrey Li and Alex Fang and Georgios Smyrnis and Maor Ivgi and Matt Jordan and Samir Gadre and Hritik Bansal and Etash Guha and Sedrick Keh and Kushal Arora and [... full author list]},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.11794},
year={2024}
}
DCLM-Baseline-7B is a 7 billion parameter language model trained on the DCLM-Baseline dataset, which was curated as part of the DataComp for Language Models (DCLM) benchmark. This model is designed to showcase the effectiveness of systematic data curation techniques for improving language model performance.
| Size | Training Tokens | Layers | Hidden Size | Attention Heads | Context Length |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7B | 2.5T | 32 | 4096 | 32 | 2048 |
First install open_lm
pip install git+https://github.com/mlfoundations/open_lm.git
Then:
from open_lm.hf import *
from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForCausalLM
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("apple/DCLM-Baseline-7B")
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("apple/DCLM-Baseline-7B")
inputs = tokenizer(["Machine learning is"], return_tensors="pt")
gen_kwargs = {"max_new_tokens": 50, "top_p": 0.8, "temperature": 0.8, "do_sample": True, "repetition_penalty": 1.1}
output = model.generate(inputs['input_ids'], **gen_kwargs)
output = tokenizer.decode(output[0].tolist(), skip_special_tokens=True)
print(output)
The model was trained using the following setup:
For more detailed training information, please refer to Section 3.4 and Appendix F of the DCLM paper. To ensure our trained model is broadly useful, including for math and coding tasks, we combine our 3.8T DCLM-BASELINE with the StarCoder and ProofPile2 data to arrive at a 4.1T token dataset.
Here are the evaluation results for DCLM-Baseline-7B on various tasks (using llm-foundry eval suite)
| Task | Score |
|---|---|
| MMLU (zero-shot) | 0.5766 |
| MMLU (few-shot) | 0.6372 |
| HellaSwag (zero-shot) | 0.7987 |
| HellaSwag | 0.8043 |
| Jeopardy | 0.4745 |
| TriviaQA | 0.5270 |
| GSM8K (CoT) | 0.0250 |
| AGI Eval SAT Math (CoT) | 0.0136 |
| AQuA (CoT) | 0.0490 |
| SVAMP (CoT) | 0.4900 |
| BigBench QA Wikidata | 0.7120 |
| ARC Easy | 0.8220 |
| ARC Challenge | 0.5990 |
| BigBench Misconceptions | 0.6986 |
| COPA | 0.8500 |
| SIQA | 0.8291 |
| CommonsenseQA | 0.8018 |
| PIQA | 0.8128 |
| OpenBookQA | 0.4540 |
| BigBench Novel Concepts | 0.7188 |
| BigBench Strange Stories | 0.7586 |
| BigBench Strategy QA | 0.6173 |
| LAMBADA | 0.8220 |
| Winograd | 0.8828 |
| Winogrande | 0.7269 |
| BigBench Conlang Translation | 0.0244 |
| BigBench Language Identification | 0.5219 |
| BigBench Conceptual Combinations | 0.6990 |
| BigBench Elementary Math QA | 0.3431 |
| BigBench Dyck Languages | 0.4930 |
| AGI Eval LSAT AR | 0.2435 |
| BigBench CS Algorithms | 0.6121 |
| BigBench Logical Deduction | 0.3620 |
| BigBench Operators | 0.4857 |
| BigBench Repeat Copy Logic | 0.4063 |
| Simple Arithmetic (no spaces) | 0.2940 |
| Simple Arithmetic (with spaces) | 0.3110 |
| MathQA | 0.3098 |
| LogiQA | 0.4132 |
| PubMedQA | 0.7060 |
| SQuAD | 0.5856 |
| AGI Eval LSAT RC | 0.6716 |
| AGI Eval LSAT LR | 0.5392 |
| CoQA | 0.4074 |
| BigBench Understanding Fables | 0.6825 |
| BoolQ | 0.8343 |
| AGI Eval SAT EN | 0.7670 |
| Winogender MC (Female) | 0.6000 |
| Winogender MC (Male) | 0.5500 |
| Enterprise PII Classification | 0.7676 |
| BBQ | 0.6912 |
| GPQA Main | 0.2612 |
| GPQA Diamond | 0.2475 |
Note: All scores are presented as decimal values between 0 and 1, representing the proportion of correct answers or the model's performance on each task.
Below are comparisions of this model with other models in the 7B regime.
| Model | Params | Tokens | Open dataset? | CORE | MMLU | EXTENDED |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Open weights, closed datasets | ||||||
| Llama2 | 7B | 2T | β | 49.2 | 45.8 | 34.1 |
| DeepSeek | 7B | 2T | β | 50.7 | 48.5 | 35.3 |
| Mistral-0.3 | 7B | ? | β | 57.0 | 62.7 | 45.1 |
| QWEN-2 | 7B | ? | β | 57.5 | 71.9 | 50.5 |
| Llama3 | 8B | 15T | β | 57.6 | 66.2 | 46.3 |
| Gemma | 8B | 6T | β | 57.8 | 64.3 | 44.6 |
| Phi-3 | 7B | ? | β | 61.0 | 69.9 | 57.9 |
| Open weights, open datasets | ||||||
| Falcon | 7B | 1T | β | 44.1 | 27.4 | 25.1 |
| OLMo-1.7 | 7B | 2.1T | β | 47.0 | 54.0 | 34.2 |
| MAP-Neo | 7B | 4.5T | β | 50.2 | 57.1 | 40.4 |
| DCLM-7B | 7B | 2.5T | β | 56.1 | 63.7 | 43.6 |
While DCLM-Baseline-7B demonstrates strong performance across a range of tasks, it's important to note:
Users should be aware that this model, like all large language models, can potentially generate harmful or biased content. It should not be used for making decisions about individuals or in sensitive applications without appropriate safeguards and human oversight.
If you use this model in your research, please cite:
@article{Li2024DataCompLM,
title={DataComp-LM: In search of the next generation of training sets for language models},
author={Jeffrey Li and Alex Fang and Georgios Smyrnis and Maor Ivgi and Matt Jordan and Samir Gadre and Hritik Bansal and Etash Guha and Sedrick Keh and Kushal Arora and [... full author list]},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.11794},
year={2024}
}