15
stars
5
commits
1
linked in READMEs
Aug 19, 2026
updated
This model is the first publicly available Late Interaction retriever that integrates:
Knowledge Distillation from strong synthetic data (200k samples generated with Qwen/Qwen3-32B-AWQ and scored by a high-performing reranker). LaserRMT compression, making it the first known ColBERT-style retriever to benefit from low-rank approximation.
Next-Generation Knowledge Distillation: By utilizing 200,000 synthetically generated, high-quality training examples (created with Qwen/Qwen3-32B-AWQ and scored by a state-of-the-art reranker), our model learns complex reasoning patterns from models 54× its size.
Groundbreaking LaserRMT Compression: As the first known ColBERT-style retriever to benefit from low-rank approximation
With only 149 million parameters – that's less than 1/45th the size of some competing models – SauerkrautLM achieves or exceeds the performance of:
This exceptional efficiency makes it the ideal choice for production environments where resource consumption and latency are critical factors.
Model: VAGOsolutions/SauerkrautLM-Multi-Reason-ModernColBERT
Base: Fine-tuned from VAGOsolutions/SauerkrautLM-Multi-ModernColBERT using knowledge distillation and LaserRMT
Architecture: PyLate / ColBERT (Late Interaction)
Languages: Multilingual (optimized for 7 European languages: German, English, Spanish, French, Italian, Dutch, Portuguese)
License: Apache 2.0
Model Size: 149M parameters
Efficiency Ratio: Up to 54× smaller than comparable performing models
ColBERT(
(0): Transformer(ModernBertModel)
(1): Dense(768 -> 128 dim, no bias)
)
Qwen/Qwen3-32B-AWQ model (32 billion parameters) based on the ReasonIR approachAs the first ColBERT-based retrieval model with Low-Rank approximation, SauerkrautLM sets new standards:
This technology combines the advantages of Late Interaction Retrieval (precise token-level matching) with the efficiency of compact models.
Our comprehensive evaluation demonstrates that model size is not destiny. Despite being 47-54× smaller than competing models, SauerkrautLM consistently delivers superior or comparable performance across challenging reasoning and multilingual retrieval tasks.
The BRIGHT benchmark is designed to evaluate reasoning‑intensive retrieval. All scores are nDCG@10. SauerkrautLM (≈149 M parameters) is compared with dense and proprietary baselines as well as the original and re‑evaluated Reason‑ModernColBERT model.
| Model / Metric | Biology | Earth | Economics | Psychology | Robotics | Stackoverflow | Sustainable | Leetcode | Pony | AoPS | Theorem‑Q | Theorem‑T | Mean StackEx | Mean coding | Mean theorem | Full Mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BM25 | 18.90 | 27.20 | 14.90 | 12.50 | 13.60 | 18.40 | 15.00 | 24.40 | 7.90 | 6.20 | 10.40 | 4.90 | 17.21 | 16.15 | 7.17 | 14.53 |
| < 1 B OS | ||||||||||||||||
| BGE | 11.70 | 24.60 | 16.60 | 17.50 | 11.70 | 10.80 | 13.30 | 26.70 | 5.70 | 6.00 | 13.00 | 6.90 | 15.17 | 16.20 | 8.63 | 13.71 |
| Inst‑L | 15.20 | 21.20 | 14.70 | 22.30 | 11.40 | 13.30 | 13.50 | 19.50 | 1.30 | 8.10 | 20.90 | 9.10 | 15.94 | 10.40 | 12.70 | 14.21 |
| SBERT | 15.10 | 20.40 | 16.60 | 22.70 | 8.20 | 11.00 | 15.30 | 26.40 | 7.00 | 5.30 | 20.00 | 10.80 | 15.61 | 16.70 | 12.03 | 14.90 |
| > 1 B OS | ||||||||||||||||
| E5 | 18.60 | 26.00 | 15.50 | 15.80 | 16.30 | 11.20 | 18.10 | 28.70 | 4.90 | 7.10 | 26.10 | 26.80 | 17.36 | 16.80 | 20.00 | 17.93 |
| SFR | 19.10 | 26.70 | 17.80 | 19.00 | 16.30 | 14.40 | 19.20 | 27.40 | 2.00 | 7.40 | 24.30 | 26.00 | 18.93 | 14.70 | 19.23 | 18.30 |
| Inst‑XL | 21.60 | 34.30 | 22.40 | 27.40 | 18.20 | 21.20 | 19.10 | 27.50 | 5.00 | 8.50 | 15.60 | 5.90 | 23.46 | 16.25 | 10.00 | 18.89 |
| GritLM | 24.80 | 32.30 | 18.90 | 19.80 | 17.10 | 13.60 | 17.80 | 29.90 | 22.00 | 8.80 | 25.20 | 21.20 | 20.61 | 25.95 | 18.40 | 20.95 |
| Qwen | 30.60 | 36.40 | 17.80 | 24.60 | 13.20 | 22.20 | 14.80 | 25.50 | 9.90 | 14.40 | 27.80 | 32.90 | 22.80 | 17.70 | 25.03 | 22.51 |
| Proprietary | ||||||||||||||||
| Cohere | 18.70 | 28.40 | 20.40 | 21.60 | 16.30 | 18.30 | 17.60 | 26.80 | 1.90 | 6.30 | 15.70 | 7.20 | 20.19 | 14.35 | 9.73 | 16.60 |
| OpenAI | 23.30 | 26.70 | 19.50 | 27.60 | 12.80 | 14.30 | 20.50 | 23.60 | 2.40 | 8.50 | 23.50 | 11.70 | 20.67 | 13.00 | 14.57 | 17.87 |
| Voyage | 23.10 | 25.40 | 19.90 | 24.90 | 10.80 | 16.80 | 15.40 | 30.60 | 1.50 | 7.50 | 27.40 | 11.60 | 19.47 | 16.05 | 15.50 | 17.91 |
| 22.70 | 34.80 | 19.60 | 27.80 | 15.70 | 20.10 | 17.10 | 29.60 | 3.60 | 9.30 | 23.80 | 15.90 | 22.54 | 16.60 | 16.33 | 20.00 | |
| ReasonIR data | ||||||||||||||||
| ReasonIR‑8B | 26.20 | 31.40 | 23.30 | 30.00 | 18.00 | 23.90 | 20.50 | 35.00 | 10.50 | 14.70 | 31.90 | 27.20 | 24.76 | 22.75 | 24.60 | 24.38 |
| Reason‑ModernColBERT (149 M) reported | 33.25 | 41.02 | 24.93 | 30.73 | 21.12 | 20.62 | 20.31 | 31.07 | 8.51 | 9.17 | 19.51 | 11.24 | 27.43 | 19.79 | 15.38 | 22.62 |
| Reason‑ModernColBERT (149 M) our eval** | 34.28 | 41.53 | 19.96 | 27.02 | 21.15 | 23.62 | 17.21 | 26.61 | 1.32 | 7.30 | 19.79 | 9.70 | 27.93 | 13.97 | 12.26 | 20.79 |
| SauerkrautLM Reasoning data | ||||||||||||||||
| SauerkrautLM-Multi-Reason-ModernColBERT (149 M) | 36.92 | 45.53 | 19.47 | 27.04 | 19.35 | 25.31 | 20.78 | 29.74 | 12.54 | 10.52 | 14.62 | 7.65 | 28.94 | 21.14 | 10.93 | 22.45 |
| SauerkrautLM‑Reason‑EuroColBERT (210 M) | 38.16 | 39.43 | 16.99 | 24.49 | 17.50 | 17.60 | 20.72 | 29.10 | 13.57 | 12.04 | 10.43 | 4.95 | 25.70 | 21.33 | 9.14 | 20.42 |
| SauerkrautLM‑Reason‑Multi‑ColBERT (15 M) | 23.33 | 23.78 | 10.53 | 9.03 | 10.28 | 10.88 | 13.13 | 18.10 | 15.86 | 1.75 | 4.29 | 0.81 | 14.64 | 16.98 | 2.28 | 11.81 |
Evaluation note: our re‑evaluation of Reason‑ModernColBERT uses the same query‑length settings from the original Lighton repo; the instructions for the originally reported scores are not public.
With 149 M parameters, SauerkrautLM surpasses several ≥7 B dense and proprietary retrievers on reasoning‑centric tasks.
All scores are nDCG@10.
| Model / Metric | Biology | Earth | Economics | Psychology | Robotics | Stackoverflow | Sustainable | Leetcode | Pony | AoPS | Theorem‑Q | Theorem‑T | Mean StackEx | Mean coding | Mean theorem | Full Mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SauerkrautLM‑Multi‑Reason‑ModernColBERT (149 M) | 28.00 | 34.71 | 12.90 | 17.98 | 13.67 | 19.64 | 17.70 | 11.66 | 15.49 | 7.27 | 6.76 | 1.32 | 21.15 | 13.57 | 5.11 | 15.59 |
| SauerkrautLM‑Reason‑EuroColBERT (210 M) | 31.09 | 31.48 | 11.95 | 18.39 | 11.25 | 14.43 | 20.26 | 25.67 | 12.15 | 9.58 | 8.15 | 2.76 | 19.76 | 18.91 | 6.83 | 16.43 |
| SauerkrautLM‑Reason‑Multi‑ColBERT (15 M) | 15.37 | 20.11 | 7.36 | 7.07 | 4.24 | 4.71 | 7.67 | 0.77 | 6.31 | 3.81 | 0.76 | 0.00 | 9.81 | 3.54 | 1.52 | 6.51 |
Observation: Our 149 M flagship dominates most German domains (Biology, Earth, Sustainable, Mean StackExchange) while the 210 M EuroColBERT secures the highest Full‑Mean (16.43), especially on coding and theorem sub‑tasks.
Average nDCG@10 across the seven languages we evaluated:
| Language | nDCG@10 |
|---|---|
| de | 50.74 |
| en | 67.32 |
| es | 53.82 |
| fr | 53.94 |
| it | 53.19 |
| nl | 51.49 |
| pt | 53.07 |
We translated both BRIGHT and NanoBEIR into seven European languages to rigorously evaluate multilingual retrieval capabilities.
Below is a scatter plot that visualises model size (millions of parameters) against BRIGHT Full‑Mean nDCG@10. SauerkrautLM models occupy the best trade‑off region—smallest models with top‑tier reasoning performance.

The efficiency gains translate to tangible benefits:
SauerkrautLM-Multi-Reason-ModernColBERT represents a paradigm shift in retrieval model design. By combining cutting-edge knowledge distillation with innovative LaserRMT compression, we've created a model that:
This breakthrough demonstrates that with the right techniques, compact models can match or exceed the capabilities of models orders of magnitude larger, democratizing access to state-of-the-art retrieval technology.
This is a multi-vector (ColBERT-style late interaction) embedding model. It maps sentences & paragraphs to sequences of 128-dimensional dense vectors and can be used for semantic textual similarity using the MaxSim operator.
This model can be used with Sentence Transformers as a multi-vector (ColBERT-style late interaction) retriever via the MultiVectorEncoder:
pip install "sentence-transformers>=6.0.0"
from sentence_transformers import MultiVectorEncoder
model = MultiVectorEncoder("VAGOsolutions/SauerkrautLM-Multi-Reason-ModernColBERT")
query = "Welcher Planet ist als der Rote Planet bekannt?"
documents = [
"Venus wird wegen ihrer ähnlichen Größe und Nähe oft als Erdzwilling bezeichnet.",
"Mars, bekannt für sein rötliches Aussehen, wird oft als der Rote Planet bezeichnet.",
"Jupiter, der größte Planet in unserem Sonnensystem, hat einen markanten roten Fleck.",
"Saturn, berühmt für seine Ringe, wird manchmal für den Roten Planeten gehalten.",
]
query_embeddings = model.encode_query(query)
document_embeddings = model.encode_document(documents)
print(query_embeddings.shape, document_embeddings[0].shape)
# (256, 128) (29, 128)
# MaxSim late-interaction scoring (higher is more relevant)
scores = model.similarity(query_embeddings, document_embeddings)
print(scores)
# tensor([[211.5445, 217.9270, 215.3372, 216.1647]])
First install the PyLate library:
pip install -U pylate
PyLate provides a streamlined interface to index and retrieve documents using ColBERT models. The index leverages the Voyager HNSW index to efficiently handle document embeddings and enable fast retrieval.
First, load the ColBERT model and initialize the Voyager index, then encode and index your documents:
from pylate import indexes, models, retrieve
# Step 1: Load the ColBERT model
model = models.ColBERT(
model_name_or_path=pylate_model_id,
)
# Step 2: Initialize the Voyager index
index = indexes.Voyager(
index_folder="pylate-index",
index_name="index",
override=True, # This overwrites the existing index if any
)
# Step 3: Encode the documents
documents_ids = ["1", "2", "3"]
documents = ["document 1 text", "document 2 text", "document 3 text"]
documents_embeddings = model.encode(
documents,
batch_size=32,
is_query=False, # Ensure that it is set to False to indicate that these are documents, not queries
show_progress_bar=True,
)
# Step 4: Add document embeddings to the index by providing embeddings and corresponding ids
index.add_documents(
documents_ids=documents_ids,
documents_embeddings=documents_embeddings,
)
Note that you do not have to recreate the index and encode the documents every time. Once you have created an index and added the documents, you can re-use the index later by loading it:
# To load an index, simply instantiate it with the correct folder/name and without overriding it
index = indexes.Voyager(
index_folder="pylate-index",
index_name="index",
)
Once the documents are indexed, you can retrieve the top-k most relevant documents for a given set of queries. To do so, initialize the ColBERT retriever with the index you want to search in, encode the queries and then retrieve the top-k documents to get the top matches ids and relevance scores:
# Step 1: Initialize the ColBERT retriever
retriever = retrieve.ColBERT(index=index)
# Step 2: Encode the queries
queries_embeddings = model.encode(
["query for document 3", "query for document 1"],
batch_size=32,
is_query=True, # # Ensure that it is set to False to indicate that these are queries
show_progress_bar=True,
)
# Step 3: Retrieve top-k documents
scores = retriever.retrieve(
queries_embeddings=queries_embeddings,
k=10, # Retrieve the top 10 matches for each query
)
If you only want to use the ColBERT model to perform reranking on top of your first-stage retrieval pipeline without building an index, you can simply use rank function and pass the queries and documents to rerank:
from pylate import rank, models
queries = [
"query A",
"query B",
]
documents = [
["document A", "document B"],
["document 1", "document C", "document B"],
]
documents_ids = [
[1, 2],
[1, 3, 2],
]
model = models.ColBERT(
model_name_or_path=pylate_model_id,
)
queries_embeddings = model.encode(
queries,
is_query=True,
)
documents_embeddings = model.encode(
documents,
is_query=False,
)
reranked_documents = rank.rerank(
documents_ids=documents_ids,
queries_embeddings=queries_embeddings,
documents_embeddings=documents_embeddings,
)
@misc{SauerkrautLM-Multi-Reason-ModernColBERT,
title={SauerkrautLM-Multi-Reason-ModernColBERT},
author={David Golchinfar},
url={https://huggingface.co/VAGOsolutions/SauerkrautLM-Multi-Reason-ModernColBERT},
year={2025}
}
@misc{GTE-ModernColBERT,
title={GTE-ModernColBERT},
author={Chaffin, Antoine},
url={https://huggingface.co/lightonai/GTE-ModernColBERT-v1},
year={2025}
}
@inproceedings{reimers-2019-sentence-bert,
title = {Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks},
author = {Reimers, Nils and Gurevych, Iryna},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing},
month = {11},
year = {2019},
publisher = {Association for Computational Linguistics},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.10084}
}
@misc{PyLate,
title={PyLate: Flexible Training and Retrieval for Late Interaction Models},
author={Chaffin, Antoine and Sourty, Raphaël},
url={https://github.com/lightonai/pylate},
year={2024}
}
We thank Antoine Chaffin (LightOn AI) for helpful discussions and for clarifying evaluation settings for Reason‑ModernColBERT, and the PyLate team for providing the training framework that made this work possible.
15
stars
5
commits
1
linked in READMEs
Aug 19, 2026
updated
This model is the first publicly available Late Interaction retriever that integrates:
Knowledge Distillation from strong synthetic data (200k samples generated with Qwen/Qwen3-32B-AWQ and scored by a high-performing reranker). LaserRMT compression, making it the first known ColBERT-style retriever to benefit from low-rank approximation.
Next-Generation Knowledge Distillation: By utilizing 200,000 synthetically generated, high-quality training examples (created with Qwen/Qwen3-32B-AWQ and scored by a state-of-the-art reranker), our model learns complex reasoning patterns from models 54× its size.
Groundbreaking LaserRMT Compression: As the first known ColBERT-style retriever to benefit from low-rank approximation
With only 149 million parameters – that's less than 1/45th the size of some competing models – SauerkrautLM achieves or exceeds the performance of:
This exceptional efficiency makes it the ideal choice for production environments where resource consumption and latency are critical factors.
Model: VAGOsolutions/SauerkrautLM-Multi-Reason-ModernColBERT
Base: Fine-tuned from VAGOsolutions/SauerkrautLM-Multi-ModernColBERT using knowledge distillation and LaserRMT
Architecture: PyLate / ColBERT (Late Interaction)
Languages: Multilingual (optimized for 7 European languages: German, English, Spanish, French, Italian, Dutch, Portuguese)
License: Apache 2.0
Model Size: 149M parameters
Efficiency Ratio: Up to 54× smaller than comparable performing models
ColBERT(
(0): Transformer(ModernBertModel)
(1): Dense(768 -> 128 dim, no bias)
)
Qwen/Qwen3-32B-AWQ model (32 billion parameters) based on the ReasonIR approachAs the first ColBERT-based retrieval model with Low-Rank approximation, SauerkrautLM sets new standards:
This technology combines the advantages of Late Interaction Retrieval (precise token-level matching) with the efficiency of compact models.
Our comprehensive evaluation demonstrates that model size is not destiny. Despite being 47-54× smaller than competing models, SauerkrautLM consistently delivers superior or comparable performance across challenging reasoning and multilingual retrieval tasks.
The BRIGHT benchmark is designed to evaluate reasoning‑intensive retrieval. All scores are nDCG@10. SauerkrautLM (≈149 M parameters) is compared with dense and proprietary baselines as well as the original and re‑evaluated Reason‑ModernColBERT model.
| Model / Metric | Biology | Earth | Economics | Psychology | Robotics | Stackoverflow | Sustainable | Leetcode | Pony | AoPS | Theorem‑Q | Theorem‑T | Mean StackEx | Mean coding | Mean theorem | Full Mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BM25 | 18.90 | 27.20 | 14.90 | 12.50 | 13.60 | 18.40 | 15.00 | 24.40 | 7.90 | 6.20 | 10.40 | 4.90 | 17.21 | 16.15 | 7.17 | 14.53 |
| < 1 B OS | ||||||||||||||||
| BGE | 11.70 | 24.60 | 16.60 | 17.50 | 11.70 | 10.80 | 13.30 | 26.70 | 5.70 | 6.00 | 13.00 | 6.90 | 15.17 | 16.20 | 8.63 | 13.71 |
| Inst‑L | 15.20 | 21.20 | 14.70 | 22.30 | 11.40 | 13.30 | 13.50 | 19.50 | 1.30 | 8.10 | 20.90 | 9.10 | 15.94 | 10.40 | 12.70 | 14.21 |
| SBERT | 15.10 | 20.40 | 16.60 | 22.70 | 8.20 | 11.00 | 15.30 | 26.40 | 7.00 | 5.30 | 20.00 | 10.80 | 15.61 | 16.70 | 12.03 | 14.90 |
| > 1 B OS | ||||||||||||||||
| E5 | 18.60 | 26.00 | 15.50 | 15.80 | 16.30 | 11.20 | 18.10 | 28.70 | 4.90 | 7.10 | 26.10 | 26.80 | 17.36 | 16.80 | 20.00 | 17.93 |
| SFR | 19.10 | 26.70 | 17.80 | 19.00 | 16.30 | 14.40 | 19.20 | 27.40 | 2.00 | 7.40 | 24.30 | 26.00 | 18.93 | 14.70 | 19.23 | 18.30 |
| Inst‑XL | 21.60 | 34.30 | 22.40 | 27.40 | 18.20 | 21.20 | 19.10 | 27.50 | 5.00 | 8.50 | 15.60 | 5.90 | 23.46 | 16.25 | 10.00 | 18.89 |
| GritLM | 24.80 | 32.30 | 18.90 | 19.80 | 17.10 | 13.60 | 17.80 | 29.90 | 22.00 | 8.80 | 25.20 | 21.20 | 20.61 | 25.95 | 18.40 | 20.95 |
| Qwen | 30.60 | 36.40 | 17.80 | 24.60 | 13.20 | 22.20 | 14.80 | 25.50 | 9.90 | 14.40 | 27.80 | 32.90 | 22.80 | 17.70 | 25.03 | 22.51 |
| Proprietary | ||||||||||||||||
| Cohere | 18.70 | 28.40 | 20.40 | 21.60 | 16.30 | 18.30 | 17.60 | 26.80 | 1.90 | 6.30 | 15.70 | 7.20 | 20.19 | 14.35 | 9.73 | 16.60 |
| OpenAI | 23.30 | 26.70 | 19.50 | 27.60 | 12.80 | 14.30 | 20.50 | 23.60 | 2.40 | 8.50 | 23.50 | 11.70 | 20.67 | 13.00 | 14.57 | 17.87 |
| Voyage | 23.10 | 25.40 | 19.90 | 24.90 | 10.80 | 16.80 | 15.40 | 30.60 | 1.50 | 7.50 | 27.40 | 11.60 | 19.47 | 16.05 | 15.50 | 17.91 |
| 22.70 | 34.80 | 19.60 | 27.80 | 15.70 | 20.10 | 17.10 | 29.60 | 3.60 | 9.30 | 23.80 | 15.90 | 22.54 | 16.60 | 16.33 | 20.00 | |
| ReasonIR data | ||||||||||||||||
| ReasonIR‑8B | 26.20 | 31.40 | 23.30 | 30.00 | 18.00 | 23.90 | 20.50 | 35.00 | 10.50 | 14.70 | 31.90 | 27.20 | 24.76 | 22.75 | 24.60 | 24.38 |
| Reason‑ModernColBERT (149 M) reported | 33.25 | 41.02 | 24.93 | 30.73 | 21.12 | 20.62 | 20.31 | 31.07 | 8.51 | 9.17 | 19.51 | 11.24 | 27.43 | 19.79 | 15.38 | 22.62 |
| Reason‑ModernColBERT (149 M) our eval** | 34.28 | 41.53 | 19.96 | 27.02 | 21.15 | 23.62 | 17.21 | 26.61 | 1.32 | 7.30 | 19.79 | 9.70 | 27.93 | 13.97 | 12.26 | 20.79 |
| SauerkrautLM Reasoning data | ||||||||||||||||
| SauerkrautLM-Multi-Reason-ModernColBERT (149 M) | 36.92 | 45.53 | 19.47 | 27.04 | 19.35 | 25.31 | 20.78 | 29.74 | 12.54 | 10.52 | 14.62 | 7.65 | 28.94 | 21.14 | 10.93 | 22.45 |
| SauerkrautLM‑Reason‑EuroColBERT (210 M) | 38.16 | 39.43 | 16.99 | 24.49 | 17.50 | 17.60 | 20.72 | 29.10 | 13.57 | 12.04 | 10.43 | 4.95 | 25.70 | 21.33 | 9.14 | 20.42 |
| SauerkrautLM‑Reason‑Multi‑ColBERT (15 M) | 23.33 | 23.78 | 10.53 | 9.03 | 10.28 | 10.88 | 13.13 | 18.10 | 15.86 | 1.75 | 4.29 | 0.81 | 14.64 | 16.98 | 2.28 | 11.81 |
Evaluation note: our re‑evaluation of Reason‑ModernColBERT uses the same query‑length settings from the original Lighton repo; the instructions for the originally reported scores are not public.
With 149 M parameters, SauerkrautLM surpasses several ≥7 B dense and proprietary retrievers on reasoning‑centric tasks.
All scores are nDCG@10.
| Model / Metric | Biology | Earth | Economics | Psychology | Robotics | Stackoverflow | Sustainable | Leetcode | Pony | AoPS | Theorem‑Q | Theorem‑T | Mean StackEx | Mean coding | Mean theorem | Full Mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SauerkrautLM‑Multi‑Reason‑ModernColBERT (149 M) | 28.00 | 34.71 | 12.90 | 17.98 | 13.67 | 19.64 | 17.70 | 11.66 | 15.49 | 7.27 | 6.76 | 1.32 | 21.15 | 13.57 | 5.11 | 15.59 |
| SauerkrautLM‑Reason‑EuroColBERT (210 M) | 31.09 | 31.48 | 11.95 | 18.39 | 11.25 | 14.43 | 20.26 | 25.67 | 12.15 | 9.58 | 8.15 | 2.76 | 19.76 | 18.91 | 6.83 | 16.43 |
| SauerkrautLM‑Reason‑Multi‑ColBERT (15 M) | 15.37 | 20.11 | 7.36 | 7.07 | 4.24 | 4.71 | 7.67 | 0.77 | 6.31 | 3.81 | 0.76 | 0.00 | 9.81 | 3.54 | 1.52 | 6.51 |
Observation: Our 149 M flagship dominates most German domains (Biology, Earth, Sustainable, Mean StackExchange) while the 210 M EuroColBERT secures the highest Full‑Mean (16.43), especially on coding and theorem sub‑tasks.
Average nDCG@10 across the seven languages we evaluated:
| Language | nDCG@10 |
|---|---|
| de | 50.74 |
| en | 67.32 |
| es | 53.82 |
| fr | 53.94 |
| it | 53.19 |
| nl | 51.49 |
| pt | 53.07 |
We translated both BRIGHT and NanoBEIR into seven European languages to rigorously evaluate multilingual retrieval capabilities.
Below is a scatter plot that visualises model size (millions of parameters) against BRIGHT Full‑Mean nDCG@10. SauerkrautLM models occupy the best trade‑off region—smallest models with top‑tier reasoning performance.

The efficiency gains translate to tangible benefits:
SauerkrautLM-Multi-Reason-ModernColBERT represents a paradigm shift in retrieval model design. By combining cutting-edge knowledge distillation with innovative LaserRMT compression, we've created a model that:
This breakthrough demonstrates that with the right techniques, compact models can match or exceed the capabilities of models orders of magnitude larger, democratizing access to state-of-the-art retrieval technology.
This is a multi-vector (ColBERT-style late interaction) embedding model. It maps sentences & paragraphs to sequences of 128-dimensional dense vectors and can be used for semantic textual similarity using the MaxSim operator.
This model can be used with Sentence Transformers as a multi-vector (ColBERT-style late interaction) retriever via the MultiVectorEncoder:
pip install "sentence-transformers>=6.0.0"
from sentence_transformers import MultiVectorEncoder
model = MultiVectorEncoder("VAGOsolutions/SauerkrautLM-Multi-Reason-ModernColBERT")
query = "Welcher Planet ist als der Rote Planet bekannt?"
documents = [
"Venus wird wegen ihrer ähnlichen Größe und Nähe oft als Erdzwilling bezeichnet.",
"Mars, bekannt für sein rötliches Aussehen, wird oft als der Rote Planet bezeichnet.",
"Jupiter, der größte Planet in unserem Sonnensystem, hat einen markanten roten Fleck.",
"Saturn, berühmt für seine Ringe, wird manchmal für den Roten Planeten gehalten.",
]
query_embeddings = model.encode_query(query)
document_embeddings = model.encode_document(documents)
print(query_embeddings.shape, document_embeddings[0].shape)
# (256, 128) (29, 128)
# MaxSim late-interaction scoring (higher is more relevant)
scores = model.similarity(query_embeddings, document_embeddings)
print(scores)
# tensor([[211.5445, 217.9270, 215.3372, 216.1647]])
First install the PyLate library:
pip install -U pylate
PyLate provides a streamlined interface to index and retrieve documents using ColBERT models. The index leverages the Voyager HNSW index to efficiently handle document embeddings and enable fast retrieval.
First, load the ColBERT model and initialize the Voyager index, then encode and index your documents:
from pylate import indexes, models, retrieve
# Step 1: Load the ColBERT model
model = models.ColBERT(
model_name_or_path=pylate_model_id,
)
# Step 2: Initialize the Voyager index
index = indexes.Voyager(
index_folder="pylate-index",
index_name="index",
override=True, # This overwrites the existing index if any
)
# Step 3: Encode the documents
documents_ids = ["1", "2", "3"]
documents = ["document 1 text", "document 2 text", "document 3 text"]
documents_embeddings = model.encode(
documents,
batch_size=32,
is_query=False, # Ensure that it is set to False to indicate that these are documents, not queries
show_progress_bar=True,
)
# Step 4: Add document embeddings to the index by providing embeddings and corresponding ids
index.add_documents(
documents_ids=documents_ids,
documents_embeddings=documents_embeddings,
)
Note that you do not have to recreate the index and encode the documents every time. Once you have created an index and added the documents, you can re-use the index later by loading it:
# To load an index, simply instantiate it with the correct folder/name and without overriding it
index = indexes.Voyager(
index_folder="pylate-index",
index_name="index",
)
Once the documents are indexed, you can retrieve the top-k most relevant documents for a given set of queries. To do so, initialize the ColBERT retriever with the index you want to search in, encode the queries and then retrieve the top-k documents to get the top matches ids and relevance scores:
# Step 1: Initialize the ColBERT retriever
retriever = retrieve.ColBERT(index=index)
# Step 2: Encode the queries
queries_embeddings = model.encode(
["query for document 3", "query for document 1"],
batch_size=32,
is_query=True, # # Ensure that it is set to False to indicate that these are queries
show_progress_bar=True,
)
# Step 3: Retrieve top-k documents
scores = retriever.retrieve(
queries_embeddings=queries_embeddings,
k=10, # Retrieve the top 10 matches for each query
)
If you only want to use the ColBERT model to perform reranking on top of your first-stage retrieval pipeline without building an index, you can simply use rank function and pass the queries and documents to rerank:
from pylate import rank, models
queries = [
"query A",
"query B",
]
documents = [
["document A", "document B"],
["document 1", "document C", "document B"],
]
documents_ids = [
[1, 2],
[1, 3, 2],
]
model = models.ColBERT(
model_name_or_path=pylate_model_id,
)
queries_embeddings = model.encode(
queries,
is_query=True,
)
documents_embeddings = model.encode(
documents,
is_query=False,
)
reranked_documents = rank.rerank(
documents_ids=documents_ids,
queries_embeddings=queries_embeddings,
documents_embeddings=documents_embeddings,
)
@misc{SauerkrautLM-Multi-Reason-ModernColBERT,
title={SauerkrautLM-Multi-Reason-ModernColBERT},
author={David Golchinfar},
url={https://huggingface.co/VAGOsolutions/SauerkrautLM-Multi-Reason-ModernColBERT},
year={2025}
}
@misc{GTE-ModernColBERT,
title={GTE-ModernColBERT},
author={Chaffin, Antoine},
url={https://huggingface.co/lightonai/GTE-ModernColBERT-v1},
year={2025}
}
@inproceedings{reimers-2019-sentence-bert,
title = {Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks},
author = {Reimers, Nils and Gurevych, Iryna},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing},
month = {11},
year = {2019},
publisher = {Association for Computational Linguistics},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.10084}
}
@misc{PyLate,
title={PyLate: Flexible Training and Retrieval for Late Interaction Models},
author={Chaffin, Antoine and Sourty, Raphaël},
url={https://github.com/lightonai/pylate},
year={2024}
}
We thank Antoine Chaffin (LightOn AI) for helpful discussions and for clarifying evaluation settings for Reason‑ModernColBERT, and the PyLate team for providing the training framework that made this work possible.