DeepGlint-AI/mlcd-vit-large-patch14-336

Model

10

stars

11

commits

1

repos using this model

3

linked in READMEs

Nov 13, 2024

updated

clip_vision_model
feature-extraction
LLaVA
safetensors
Vision
Browse cluster: Vision Transformers and Scalable Vision Encoders

README

[Paper] [GitHub]

Model

We used the same Vision Transformer architecture ViT-L/14@336px as CLIP.

image/png

Data

Our model was trained on publicly available image-caption data from the LAION400M and COYO700M datasets.

Performance and Limitations

A. MLLMs Evaluation Results

In our experiments, we replaced the CLIP model in LLaVA-NeXT with the MLCD model to demonstrate the performance of the MLCD model in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs). For the language model, we used Qwen2.5-7B. The evaluation results show that the modified model performs exceptionally well across multiple benchmarks, validating the effectiveness of the MLCD model within MLLMs.

Vision TowerMLCD (ViT_L_14_336px)CLIP (ViT_L_14_336px)
LLMQwen2.5-7BQwen2.5-7B
AI2D76.9873.15
ScienceQA_img78.0976.35
GQA64.1763.31
InfoVQA_val43.4838.88
MMBench_cn_dev74.8372.51
MMBench_en_dev76.3774.57
MME(cognition)432384
MME(perception)15981512
SeedBench68.2066.80
SeedBench_img73.7572.72
MMStar50.9848.98
MMMU44.3044.20
OCRBench531.00525.00
ChartQA67.8466.52
DocVQA_val76.4675.21
POPE88.6988.83
TextVQA_val61.6962.47

B. Linear Probe Evaluation Results

This table presents the results of linear probe evaluations comparing CLIP and MLCD models on the ViT_L_14_336px architecture across various datasets. The linear probe test freezes the pre-trained model's weights and trains a linear classifier on top to assess how well the model's representations generalize to different tasks.

DatasetMLCD (ViT_L_14_336px)CLIP (ViT_L_14_336px)
AVG87.1585.35
Food10196.2195.90
CIFAR-1099.3697.90
CIFAR-10093.6987.40
Birdsnap88.1879.90
SUN39787.9682.20
Stanford Cars95.1691.50
FGVC Aircraft86.3871.60
Describable Textures Dataset86.7083.00
Oxford-IIIT Pets96.2795.10
Caltech-10197.9296.00
Flowers10299.5899.20
MNIST98.6799.20
STL-1099.2899.70
EuroSAT99.0698.10
RESISC4595.4894.90
GTSRB92.3292.40
KITTI75.3969.20
Country21138.1246.40
PatchCamelyon88.0085.60
UCF10192.8692.00
Kinetics-70073.3573.00
CLEVR64.4060.30
Hateful Memes72.0077.30
SST-276.3380.50
ImageNet86.3085.40

C. Limitations

Models with higher resolution are more friendly to OCR results. We are currently training such models and will soon make them available.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our gratitude to Xie Yin and Yumeng Wang for their significant contributions to the experimental validation in MLLMs.

Contributors

xiangan

11 commits

DeepGlint-AI/mlcd-vit-large-patch14-336

Model

10

stars

11

commits

1

repos using this model

3

linked in READMEs

Nov 13, 2024

updated

clip_vision_model
feature-extraction
LLaVA
safetensors
Vision
Browse cluster: Vision Transformers and Scalable Vision Encoders

README

[Paper] [GitHub]

Model

We used the same Vision Transformer architecture ViT-L/14@336px as CLIP.

image/png

Data

Our model was trained on publicly available image-caption data from the LAION400M and COYO700M datasets.

Performance and Limitations

A. MLLMs Evaluation Results

In our experiments, we replaced the CLIP model in LLaVA-NeXT with the MLCD model to demonstrate the performance of the MLCD model in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs). For the language model, we used Qwen2.5-7B. The evaluation results show that the modified model performs exceptionally well across multiple benchmarks, validating the effectiveness of the MLCD model within MLLMs.

Vision TowerMLCD (ViT_L_14_336px)CLIP (ViT_L_14_336px)
LLMQwen2.5-7BQwen2.5-7B
AI2D76.9873.15
ScienceQA_img78.0976.35
GQA64.1763.31
InfoVQA_val43.4838.88
MMBench_cn_dev74.8372.51
MMBench_en_dev76.3774.57
MME(cognition)432384
MME(perception)15981512
SeedBench68.2066.80
SeedBench_img73.7572.72
MMStar50.9848.98
MMMU44.3044.20
OCRBench531.00525.00
ChartQA67.8466.52
DocVQA_val76.4675.21
POPE88.6988.83
TextVQA_val61.6962.47

B. Linear Probe Evaluation Results

This table presents the results of linear probe evaluations comparing CLIP and MLCD models on the ViT_L_14_336px architecture across various datasets. The linear probe test freezes the pre-trained model's weights and trains a linear classifier on top to assess how well the model's representations generalize to different tasks.

DatasetMLCD (ViT_L_14_336px)CLIP (ViT_L_14_336px)
AVG87.1585.35
Food10196.2195.90
CIFAR-1099.3697.90
CIFAR-10093.6987.40
Birdsnap88.1879.90
SUN39787.9682.20
Stanford Cars95.1691.50
FGVC Aircraft86.3871.60
Describable Textures Dataset86.7083.00
Oxford-IIIT Pets96.2795.10
Caltech-10197.9296.00
Flowers10299.5899.20
MNIST98.6799.20
STL-1099.2899.70
EuroSAT99.0698.10
RESISC4595.4894.90
GTSRB92.3292.40
KITTI75.3969.20
Country21138.1246.40
PatchCamelyon88.0085.60
UCF10192.8692.00
Kinetics-70073.3573.00
CLEVR64.4060.30
Hateful Memes72.0077.30
SST-276.3380.50
ImageNet86.3085.40

C. Limitations

Models with higher resolution are more friendly to OCR results. We are currently training such models and will soon make them available.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our gratitude to Xie Yin and Yumeng Wang for their significant contributions to the experimental validation in MLLMs.

Contributors

xiangan

11 commits