191
stars
500
commits
3
linked in READMEs
Aug 20, 2026
updated
π Ultra-FineWeb Technical Report | π¦ UltraData Collection | π UltraData
English | δΈζ
Ultra-FineWeb-L1 is a large-scale English web corpus built from Common Crawl snapshots. Within UltraData's L0-L4 tiered data management framework, it serves as the L1 filtered layer for general web data and provides the foundation for subsequent L2 selection and L3 refinement. Building on the FineWeb processing pipeline, we perform main-text extraction, language filtering, heuristic filtering, sensitive-field replacement, MinHash deduplication, and customized data cleaning. We upgrade main-text extraction to trafilatura 2.0, and use UltraData's data quality inspection tools and data-cleaning agents to optimize cleaning rules and apply targeted processing for residual HTML, encoding corruption and mojibake, invisible characters, corrupted content, and abnormal document lengths. The first release contains 1T+ tokens (approximately 1.14 billion documents) from six Common Crawl snapshots in 2025. We also release Ultra-FineWeb, the L2 selected subset produced by the Ultra-FineWeb classifier.
CC-MAIN-2025-51. πππEach Common Crawl dump is processed independently:
Ultra-FineWeb-L1 is organized by Common Crawl dump:
data/
βββ CC-MAIN-YYYY-WW/
βββ CC-MAIN-YYYY-WW-part-0001-of-NNNN.parquet
βββ CC-MAIN-YYYY-WW-part-0002-of-NNNN.parquet
βββ ...
The classifier-selected L2 subset is released in Ultra-FineWeb:
data/ultrafineweb_l1_en_hq/
βββ CC-MAIN-YYYY-WW/
βββ ultrafineweb-l1-en-hq-CC-MAIN-YYYY-WW-part-0001-of-NNNN.parquet
βββ ...
| Field | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
uid | string | UUID4 document identifier |
content | string | Cleaned plain-text document |
meta | string | JSON-encoded source and processing metadata, including url, language, language_score, warc_record_id, warc_date, and source_file |
dataset_index | int64 | Dataset-source identifier |
We follow the FinePhrase evaluation setup and adopt the FineWeb ablation methodology: each data configuration is evaluated on 12 benchmarks across six categories using 3-shot prompting with a single random seed. For most tasks, we use the Cloze Format (CF), framing evaluation as next-token prediction. Compared with standard multiple-choice evaluation, CF reduces interference from instruction following and answer formatting for smaller models and provides a more stable evaluation signal. The benchmarks are:
To evaluate the effectiveness of the cleaning pipeline, we select CC-MAIN-2025-26, the latest Common Crawl snapshot covered by FineWeb v1.4, and compare data processed by the FineWeb v1.4 and Ultra-FineWeb-L1 pipelines. Both groups are trained for 20B tokens with the MiniCPM5-1B model under identical settings: 32 GPUs, a micro batch size of 16, a global batch size of 512, the Muon optimizer, an initial learning rate of 0.000522, and a minimum learning rate of 0.0000522.
The figures below show the six-category macro-average and 12-task micro-average scores of four data configurations throughout training. Scores generally improve as the number of training tokens increases. At the end of training, Ultra-FineWeb-L1 reaches 9.668% macro and 9.180% micro, outperforming FineWeb by 0.635 and 0.696 percentage points, respectively, and validating the effectiveness of the optimized cleaning pipeline. Quality selection yields further gains: Ultra-FineWeb-from-FW reaches 9.954% / 9.414%, while Ultra-FineWeb-from-L1 achieves the best results at 10.379% / 9.798%, indicating that L1 cleaning and subsequent quality selection provide complementary benefits.
| Data | Six-category Macro Average | 12-task Micro Average |
|---|---|---|
| FineWeb | 9.033% | 8.484% |
| Ultra-FineWeb-L1 | 9.668% | 9.180% |
| Ultra-FineWeb-from-FW | 9.954% | 9.414% |
| Ultra-FineWeb-from-L1 | 10.379% | 9.798% |
We thank these outstanding open-source projectsβtheir contributions make Ultra-FineWeb-L1 possible! π
If you find Ultra-FineWeb-L1 useful in your research, please consider citing:
@misc{wang2025ultrafineweb,
title={{Ultra-FineWeb}: Efficient Data Filtering and Verification for High-Quality LLM Training Data},
author={Yudong Wang and Zixuan Fu and Jie Cai and Peijun Tang and Hongya Lyu and Yewei Fang and Zhi Zheng and Jie Zhou and Guoyang Zeng and Chaojun Xiao and Xu Han and Zhiyuan Liu},
year={2025},
eprint={2505.05427},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.CL}
}
@misc{ultra-fineweb-l1,
title={Ultra-FineWeb-L1},
author={Junshao Guo and Shuaikang Xue and Xiaofei Yang and Chuyue Zhou and Qiang Yin and Qingyang Yuan and Qiang Ma and Yuzhou Zhang and Jie Zhou and Chaojun Xiao and Yudong Wang and Zhiyuan Liu},
year={2026},
url={https://huggingface.co/datasets/openbmb/Ultra-FineWeb-L1},
publisher={Hugging Face}
}
This project is licensed under the Apache 2.0 license. Because the corpus is derived from web content, users must also comply with the rights, licenses, and terms associated with the original sources.
No unauthorized unchanged redistribution: Without prior written permission from the original authors (or this organization), any institution, organization, or third-party platform is strictly prohibited from directly reposting, mirroring, re-hosting, or commercially repackaging and republishing any artifacts of this project in any form.
191
stars
500
commits
3
linked in READMEs
Aug 20, 2026
updated
π Ultra-FineWeb Technical Report | π¦ UltraData Collection | π UltraData
English | δΈζ
Ultra-FineWeb-L1 is a large-scale English web corpus built from Common Crawl snapshots. Within UltraData's L0-L4 tiered data management framework, it serves as the L1 filtered layer for general web data and provides the foundation for subsequent L2 selection and L3 refinement. Building on the FineWeb processing pipeline, we perform main-text extraction, language filtering, heuristic filtering, sensitive-field replacement, MinHash deduplication, and customized data cleaning. We upgrade main-text extraction to trafilatura 2.0, and use UltraData's data quality inspection tools and data-cleaning agents to optimize cleaning rules and apply targeted processing for residual HTML, encoding corruption and mojibake, invisible characters, corrupted content, and abnormal document lengths. The first release contains 1T+ tokens (approximately 1.14 billion documents) from six Common Crawl snapshots in 2025. We also release Ultra-FineWeb, the L2 selected subset produced by the Ultra-FineWeb classifier.
CC-MAIN-2025-51. πππEach Common Crawl dump is processed independently:
Ultra-FineWeb-L1 is organized by Common Crawl dump:
data/
βββ CC-MAIN-YYYY-WW/
βββ CC-MAIN-YYYY-WW-part-0001-of-NNNN.parquet
βββ CC-MAIN-YYYY-WW-part-0002-of-NNNN.parquet
βββ ...
The classifier-selected L2 subset is released in Ultra-FineWeb:
data/ultrafineweb_l1_en_hq/
βββ CC-MAIN-YYYY-WW/
βββ ultrafineweb-l1-en-hq-CC-MAIN-YYYY-WW-part-0001-of-NNNN.parquet
βββ ...
| Field | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
uid | string | UUID4 document identifier |
content | string | Cleaned plain-text document |
meta | string | JSON-encoded source and processing metadata, including url, language, language_score, warc_record_id, warc_date, and source_file |
dataset_index | int64 | Dataset-source identifier |
We follow the FinePhrase evaluation setup and adopt the FineWeb ablation methodology: each data configuration is evaluated on 12 benchmarks across six categories using 3-shot prompting with a single random seed. For most tasks, we use the Cloze Format (CF), framing evaluation as next-token prediction. Compared with standard multiple-choice evaluation, CF reduces interference from instruction following and answer formatting for smaller models and provides a more stable evaluation signal. The benchmarks are:
To evaluate the effectiveness of the cleaning pipeline, we select CC-MAIN-2025-26, the latest Common Crawl snapshot covered by FineWeb v1.4, and compare data processed by the FineWeb v1.4 and Ultra-FineWeb-L1 pipelines. Both groups are trained for 20B tokens with the MiniCPM5-1B model under identical settings: 32 GPUs, a micro batch size of 16, a global batch size of 512, the Muon optimizer, an initial learning rate of 0.000522, and a minimum learning rate of 0.0000522.
The figures below show the six-category macro-average and 12-task micro-average scores of four data configurations throughout training. Scores generally improve as the number of training tokens increases. At the end of training, Ultra-FineWeb-L1 reaches 9.668% macro and 9.180% micro, outperforming FineWeb by 0.635 and 0.696 percentage points, respectively, and validating the effectiveness of the optimized cleaning pipeline. Quality selection yields further gains: Ultra-FineWeb-from-FW reaches 9.954% / 9.414%, while Ultra-FineWeb-from-L1 achieves the best results at 10.379% / 9.798%, indicating that L1 cleaning and subsequent quality selection provide complementary benefits.
| Data | Six-category Macro Average | 12-task Micro Average |
|---|---|---|
| FineWeb | 9.033% | 8.484% |
| Ultra-FineWeb-L1 | 9.668% | 9.180% |
| Ultra-FineWeb-from-FW | 9.954% | 9.414% |
| Ultra-FineWeb-from-L1 | 10.379% | 9.798% |
We thank these outstanding open-source projectsβtheir contributions make Ultra-FineWeb-L1 possible! π
If you find Ultra-FineWeb-L1 useful in your research, please consider citing:
@misc{wang2025ultrafineweb,
title={{Ultra-FineWeb}: Efficient Data Filtering and Verification for High-Quality LLM Training Data},
author={Yudong Wang and Zixuan Fu and Jie Cai and Peijun Tang and Hongya Lyu and Yewei Fang and Zhi Zheng and Jie Zhou and Guoyang Zeng and Chaojun Xiao and Xu Han and Zhiyuan Liu},
year={2025},
eprint={2505.05427},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.CL}
}
@misc{ultra-fineweb-l1,
title={Ultra-FineWeb-L1},
author={Junshao Guo and Shuaikang Xue and Xiaofei Yang and Chuyue Zhou and Qiang Yin and Qingyang Yuan and Qiang Ma and Yuzhou Zhang and Jie Zhou and Chaojun Xiao and Yudong Wang and Zhiyuan Liu},
year={2026},
url={https://huggingface.co/datasets/openbmb/Ultra-FineWeb-L1},
publisher={Hugging Face}
}
This project is licensed under the Apache 2.0 license. Because the corpus is derived from web content, users must also comply with the rights, licenses, and terms associated with the original sources.
No unauthorized unchanged redistribution: Without prior written permission from the original authors (or this organization), any institution, organization, or third-party platform is strictly prohibited from directly reposting, mirroring, re-hosting, or commercially repackaging and republishing any artifacts of this project in any form.