Paper: Reasoning with LLMs for Cancer Treatment Outcome Prediction
Authors: Geetha Krishna Guruju, Raghu Vamsi Hemadri et al.
License: CC BY 4.0
Dataset size: 24,856 samples
Modality: Text
Task: Clinical reasoning generation (Chain-of-Thought)
Code: OncoReason GitHub Repository
The Cancer Reasoning Traces dataset contains structured chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning and commentary derived from oncology patient summaries in the MSK-CHORD dataset.
Each record corresponds to a single anonymized cancer patient and captures the step-by-step clinical reasoning process behind survival and treatment outcome prediction — without including the final prediction itself.
This dataset enables the training and evaluation of reasoning-aligned large language models (LLMs) that can articulate clinically grounded, interpretable reasoning for oncology tasks.
| Column | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
patient_id | string | Unique anonymized identifier for each patient (e.g., "P-0000412"). |
chain_of_thought | list[string] | Ordered reasoning steps describing how the model interprets patient attributes, treatment history, and biomarkers to form a prognosis rationale. Each step reflects a clinically meaningful inference. |
comments | string | Free-text notes describing ambiguities, missing data, or edge cases encountered during reasoning (e.g., “HER2 status missing” or “Incomplete record for immunotherapy duration”). |
chain_of_thought: ordered reasoning stepscomments: concise notes about uncertainty or missing informationThis dataset can be used for:
This dataset is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
If you use this dataset in your research or project, please cite the following paper:
OncoReason: Structuring Clinical Reasoning in LLMs for Robust and Interpretable Survival Prediction
Raghu Vamshi Hemadri, Geetha Krishna Guruju, Kristi Topollai, Anna Ewa Choromanska
arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.17532
https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.17532
@misc{hemadri2025oncoreasonstructuringclinicalreasoning,
title={OncoReason: Structuring Clinical Reasoning in LLMs for Robust and Interpretable Survival Prediction},
author={Raghu Vamshi Hemadri and Geetha Krishna Guruju and Kristi Topollai and Anna Ewa Choromanska},
year={2025},
eprint={2510.17532},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.CL},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.17532},
}
12 commits
Paper: Reasoning with LLMs for Cancer Treatment Outcome Prediction
Authors: Geetha Krishna Guruju, Raghu Vamsi Hemadri et al.
License: CC BY 4.0
Dataset size: 24,856 samples
Modality: Text
Task: Clinical reasoning generation (Chain-of-Thought)
Code: OncoReason GitHub Repository
The Cancer Reasoning Traces dataset contains structured chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning and commentary derived from oncology patient summaries in the MSK-CHORD dataset.
Each record corresponds to a single anonymized cancer patient and captures the step-by-step clinical reasoning process behind survival and treatment outcome prediction — without including the final prediction itself.
This dataset enables the training and evaluation of reasoning-aligned large language models (LLMs) that can articulate clinically grounded, interpretable reasoning for oncology tasks.
| Column | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
patient_id | string | Unique anonymized identifier for each patient (e.g., "P-0000412"). |
chain_of_thought | list[string] | Ordered reasoning steps describing how the model interprets patient attributes, treatment history, and biomarkers to form a prognosis rationale. Each step reflects a clinically meaningful inference. |
comments | string | Free-text notes describing ambiguities, missing data, or edge cases encountered during reasoning (e.g., “HER2 status missing” or “Incomplete record for immunotherapy duration”). |
chain_of_thought: ordered reasoning stepscomments: concise notes about uncertainty or missing informationThis dataset can be used for:
This dataset is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
If you use this dataset in your research or project, please cite the following paper:
OncoReason: Structuring Clinical Reasoning in LLMs for Robust and Interpretable Survival Prediction
Raghu Vamshi Hemadri, Geetha Krishna Guruju, Kristi Topollai, Anna Ewa Choromanska
arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.17532
https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.17532
@misc{hemadri2025oncoreasonstructuringclinicalreasoning,
title={OncoReason: Structuring Clinical Reasoning in LLMs for Robust and Interpretable Survival Prediction},
author={Raghu Vamshi Hemadri and Geetha Krishna Guruju and Kristi Topollai and Anna Ewa Choromanska},
year={2025},
eprint={2510.17532},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.CL},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.17532},
}
12 commits