nyrahealth/disfluency_speech_german is a German speech dataset for evaluating verbatim ASR: models that should transcribe not only the intended words, but also fillers, cutoffs, repetitions, and sound events.
This dataset was recorded in-house by two Nyra researchers, Berns and Laurin, with the goal of producing natural disfluent German speech similar in spirit to the English AMAAI Lab DisfluencySpeech dataset.
Like the English release, it is formatted for verbatim-transcription benchmarking with paired:
verbatim_transcript: what the speaker actually saidintended_transcript: a cleaned version of what the speaker meant to sayIt is used by the Nyra Verbatim Speech Benchmark, which evaluates verbatim ASR in detail and breaks errors down into fillers, sounds, cutoffs, repetitions, and intended-transcript failures.
For the exact convention definitions used by the benchmark, see:
This German dataset was designed as a companion to the English verbatim benchmark data.
The English reference point is:
The German release is not part of that original dataset. Instead, it is an in-house Nyra dataset that follows the same general idea: paired verbatim and intended transcripts for detailed evaluation of disfluent speech transcription.
The dataset contains 202 utterances and about 0.95 hours of audio.
Splits:
test: 202Features:
idaudioduration_in_ssplitspeakerlanguageverbatim_transcriptintended_transcriptThe verbatim_transcript follows a small set of explicit conventions so disfluencies and non-speech events can be evaluated consistently:
*, for example w*, d*, or bru*[UH] and [UM][lipsmack], [throatclearing], [laughter], or [cough]Example:
Also, [UM] ich denke, dass [lipsmack] wir vielleicht [UH] nächste Woche, [UM] ich meine am Wochenende, einen Ausflug machen könnten, weil das w* w* Wetter ganz gut aussieht.
The intended_transcript is the cleaned target for intended ASR. It removes disfluent material while preserving the speaker's meaning, including fillers, sound tags, repeated restarts, and cutoff fragments.
Example:
verbatim: Also, [UM] ich denke, dass [lipsmack] wir vielleicht [UH] nächste Woche, [UM] ich meine am Wochenende, einen Ausflug machen könnten, weil das w* w* Wetter ganz gut aussieht.
intended: Also, ich denke, dass wir vielleicht am Wochenende einen Ausflug machen könnten, weil das Wetter ganz gut aussieht.
This makes the dataset suitable for evaluating both:
The counts below were computed over the full dataset from verbatim_transcript.
Summary:
202202846394| Tag | Count |
|---|---|
[UH] | 348 |
[UM] | 266 |
| Tag | Count |
|---|---|
[throatclearing] | 57 |
[laughter] | 57 |
[lipsmack] | 50 |
[cough] | 21 |
[sniff] | 16 |
[breath] | 13 |
[yawn] | 11 |
[sigh] | 5 |
[noise] | 2 |
| Marker | Count |
|---|---|
* cutoff tokens | 394 |
These statistics show that the German set is deliberately dense in disfluencies: every utterance contains at least one annotated event or cutoff, fillers are very frequent, and cutoff fragments occur often enough to be a core evaluation category.
This dataset is designed to be used with the Nyra Verbatim Speech Benchmark.
That benchmark:
vWER and iWERIf you use this dataset, please cite the benchmark repository and describe that the German recordings were collected in-house by Nyra researchers Berns and Laurin as a German companion set for verbatim-ASR evaluation.
6 commits
nyrahealth/disfluency_speech_german is a German speech dataset for evaluating verbatim ASR: models that should transcribe not only the intended words, but also fillers, cutoffs, repetitions, and sound events.
This dataset was recorded in-house by two Nyra researchers, Berns and Laurin, with the goal of producing natural disfluent German speech similar in spirit to the English AMAAI Lab DisfluencySpeech dataset.
Like the English release, it is formatted for verbatim-transcription benchmarking with paired:
verbatim_transcript: what the speaker actually saidintended_transcript: a cleaned version of what the speaker meant to sayIt is used by the Nyra Verbatim Speech Benchmark, which evaluates verbatim ASR in detail and breaks errors down into fillers, sounds, cutoffs, repetitions, and intended-transcript failures.
For the exact convention definitions used by the benchmark, see:
This German dataset was designed as a companion to the English verbatim benchmark data.
The English reference point is:
The German release is not part of that original dataset. Instead, it is an in-house Nyra dataset that follows the same general idea: paired verbatim and intended transcripts for detailed evaluation of disfluent speech transcription.
The dataset contains 202 utterances and about 0.95 hours of audio.
Splits:
test: 202Features:
idaudioduration_in_ssplitspeakerlanguageverbatim_transcriptintended_transcriptThe verbatim_transcript follows a small set of explicit conventions so disfluencies and non-speech events can be evaluated consistently:
*, for example w*, d*, or bru*[UH] and [UM][lipsmack], [throatclearing], [laughter], or [cough]Example:
Also, [UM] ich denke, dass [lipsmack] wir vielleicht [UH] nächste Woche, [UM] ich meine am Wochenende, einen Ausflug machen könnten, weil das w* w* Wetter ganz gut aussieht.
The intended_transcript is the cleaned target for intended ASR. It removes disfluent material while preserving the speaker's meaning, including fillers, sound tags, repeated restarts, and cutoff fragments.
Example:
verbatim: Also, [UM] ich denke, dass [lipsmack] wir vielleicht [UH] nächste Woche, [UM] ich meine am Wochenende, einen Ausflug machen könnten, weil das w* w* Wetter ganz gut aussieht.
intended: Also, ich denke, dass wir vielleicht am Wochenende einen Ausflug machen könnten, weil das Wetter ganz gut aussieht.
This makes the dataset suitable for evaluating both:
The counts below were computed over the full dataset from verbatim_transcript.
Summary:
202202846394| Tag | Count |
|---|---|
[UH] | 348 |
[UM] | 266 |
| Tag | Count |
|---|---|
[throatclearing] | 57 |
[laughter] | 57 |
[lipsmack] | 50 |
[cough] | 21 |
[sniff] | 16 |
[breath] | 13 |
[yawn] | 11 |
[sigh] | 5 |
[noise] | 2 |
| Marker | Count |
|---|---|
* cutoff tokens | 394 |
These statistics show that the German set is deliberately dense in disfluencies: every utterance contains at least one annotated event or cutoff, fillers are very frequent, and cutoff fragments occur often enough to be a core evaluation category.
This dataset is designed to be used with the Nyra Verbatim Speech Benchmark.
That benchmark:
vWER and iWERIf you use this dataset, please cite the benchmark repository and describe that the German recordings were collected in-house by Nyra researchers Berns and Laurin as a German companion set for verbatim-ASR evaluation.
6 commits