LoHoSearch: Benchmarking Long-Horizon
14
16 commits
1 linked in READMEs
updated Jun 12, 2026
📃 Paper • 🏆 Benchmark • 📦 Training Data
Search agent benchmarks exemplified by BrowseComp have rapidly saturated over the past year, with the strongest models surpassing 90% accuracy. Since these benchmarks are predominantly human-authored, annotators lack a global perspective on entity statistics and cannot systematically maximize search space size and structural complexity. This creates a difficulty ceiling that is hard to break. To address this, we introduce LoHoSearch (Long-Horizon Search Agents), a challenging benchmark comprising 544 human-verified questions across 11 domains. LoHoSearch is constructed via an automated pipeline built upon a knowledge graph covering over 7 million Wikipedia entities, which selects relations with large search spaces and assembles them into structurally complex questions with KG-verified unique answers. Our evaluation demonstrates that even the strongest model achieves only 34.74% accuracy, and existing context management strategies (best +6.8%) yield far smaller gains than on prior benchmarks. LoHoSearch provides a more demanding standard for evaluating long-horizon reasoning and context management in search agents. For more details, see our paper.
This repository contains two subsets:
| Config | File | Split | Records | Description | Language |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
benchmark | LoHoSearch.csv | test | 544 | Human-verified evaluation benchmark | English |
train | train.csv | train | 2000 | Training set generated by the same automated pipeline, without human verification | English |
Evaluation setup. Each model is equipped with two tools, search (keyword queries via a traditional search engine) and browse (fetch the content of given URLs), and uses the same system prompt as BrowseComp. We set temperature to 1.0, keep each model's default thinking settings, and use a 200K context window (184K input + 16K output). The score is the average correct ratio over the 544 questions, computed by averaging two LLM-judge gradings: the BrowseComp grading prompt with GPT-4.1 as judge, and the SimpleQA grading prompt with Qwen2.5-32B as judge. Averaging two complementary judges avoids the over-strictness or over-leniency of any single setup.
| Model | Reasoning | Source | LoHoSearch Score (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5.5 | N | Closed | 34.74 |
| DeepSeek-V4-Pro | Y | Open | 15.99 |
| Claude-Opus-4.6 | N | Closed | 15.62 |
| Kimi-K2.6 | Y | Open | 15.53 |
| Gemini-3.1-Pro | Y | Closed | 13.32 |
| GLM-5.1 | Y | Open | 12.77 |
| Claude-Opus-4.7 | N | Closed | 10.29 |
| DeepSeek-V4-Flash | Y | Open | 10.02 |
| LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 | Y | Open | 9.74 |
| MiniMax-M2.7 | Y | Open | 2.48 |
| MiniMax-M2.5 | Y | Open | 2.29 |
The benchmark is constructed through four stages:
@misc{zhao2026lohosearchbenchmarkinglonghorizonsearch,
title={LoHoSearch: Benchmarking Long-Horizon Search Agents Beyond the Human Difficulty Ceiling},
author={Jiarui Zhao and Rongzhi Zhang and Lingchuan Liu and Hao Yang and Xunliang Cai and Xi Su},
year={2026},
eprint={2606.12837},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.CL},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.12837},
}
This dataset is released under the MIT License.
LoHoSearch: Benchmarking Long-Horizon
14
16 commits
1 linked in READMEs
updated Jun 12, 2026
📃 Paper • 🏆 Benchmark • 📦 Training Data
Search agent benchmarks exemplified by BrowseComp have rapidly saturated over the past year, with the strongest models surpassing 90% accuracy. Since these benchmarks are predominantly human-authored, annotators lack a global perspective on entity statistics and cannot systematically maximize search space size and structural complexity. This creates a difficulty ceiling that is hard to break. To address this, we introduce LoHoSearch (Long-Horizon Search Agents), a challenging benchmark comprising 544 human-verified questions across 11 domains. LoHoSearch is constructed via an automated pipeline built upon a knowledge graph covering over 7 million Wikipedia entities, which selects relations with large search spaces and assembles them into structurally complex questions with KG-verified unique answers. Our evaluation demonstrates that even the strongest model achieves only 34.74% accuracy, and existing context management strategies (best +6.8%) yield far smaller gains than on prior benchmarks. LoHoSearch provides a more demanding standard for evaluating long-horizon reasoning and context management in search agents. For more details, see our paper.
This repository contains two subsets:
| Config | File | Split | Records | Description | Language |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
benchmark | LoHoSearch.csv | test | 544 | Human-verified evaluation benchmark | English |
train | train.csv | train | 2000 | Training set generated by the same automated pipeline, without human verification | English |
Evaluation setup. Each model is equipped with two tools, search (keyword queries via a traditional search engine) and browse (fetch the content of given URLs), and uses the same system prompt as BrowseComp. We set temperature to 1.0, keep each model's default thinking settings, and use a 200K context window (184K input + 16K output). The score is the average correct ratio over the 544 questions, computed by averaging two LLM-judge gradings: the BrowseComp grading prompt with GPT-4.1 as judge, and the SimpleQA grading prompt with Qwen2.5-32B as judge. Averaging two complementary judges avoids the over-strictness or over-leniency of any single setup.
| Model | Reasoning | Source | LoHoSearch Score (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5.5 | N | Closed | 34.74 |
| DeepSeek-V4-Pro | Y | Open | 15.99 |
| Claude-Opus-4.6 | N | Closed | 15.62 |
| Kimi-K2.6 | Y | Open | 15.53 |
| Gemini-3.1-Pro | Y | Closed | 13.32 |
| GLM-5.1 | Y | Open | 12.77 |
| Claude-Opus-4.7 | N | Closed | 10.29 |
| DeepSeek-V4-Flash | Y | Open | 10.02 |
| LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 | Y | Open | 9.74 |
| MiniMax-M2.7 | Y | Open | 2.48 |
| MiniMax-M2.5 | Y | Open | 2.29 |
The benchmark is constructed through four stages:
@misc{zhao2026lohosearchbenchmarkinglonghorizonsearch,
title={LoHoSearch: Benchmarking Long-Horizon Search Agents Beyond the Human Difficulty Ceiling},
author={Jiarui Zhao and Rongzhi Zhang and Lingchuan Liu and Hao Yang and Xunliang Cai and Xi Su},
year={2026},
eprint={2606.12837},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.CL},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.12837},
}
This dataset is released under the MIT License.