creative-graphic-design/GraphicDesignEvaluation

Dataset

Dataset Card for GraphicDesignEvaluation

1

103 commits

1 linked in READMEs

updated Jun 26, 2026

See the code

README

Dataset Card for GraphicDesignEvaluation

CI Sync HF

Dataset Description

Dataset Summary

GraphicDesignEvaluation is a human-rated benchmark released with Can GPTs Evaluate Graphic Design Based on Design Principles?. The paper compares GPT-based evaluation and heuristic metrics against human ratings for three representative design principles: alignment, overlap, and white space. The dataset contains graphic banner designs curated from an online service, perturbed low-quality variants, and human annotations collected from 60 subjects.

Supported Tasks and Leaderboards

The dataset supports graphic design quality evaluation, human/model score correlation analysis, and design-principle-specific assessment. No public leaderboard is bundled with this Hugging Face dataset.

Languages

Annotations and evaluation descriptions are in English (en).

Dataset Structure

Data Fields

Absolute configs contain image_id, image, perturbation, scores, and avg. Relative configs contain image_id, image, comparative, scores, and avg.

Data Splits

All configs expose a single train split. Absolute configs have 400 rows each; relative configs have 300 rows each.

Dataset Creation

The dataset was created to study whether GPT-based evaluators can assess graphic design quality according to core design principles and how those scores compare with human annotations.

Considerations for Using the Data

The dataset is small and principle-specific. It should be used as an evaluation resource rather than a complete measure of graphic design quality.

Additional Information

Licensing Information

The local loader lists the dataset license as Apache 2.0.

Citation Information

@inproceedings{haraguchi2024can,
  title={Can GPTs Evaluate Graphic Design Based on Design Principles?},
  author={Haraguchi, Daichi and Inoue, Naoto and Shimoda, Wataru and Mitani, Hayato and Uchida, Seiichi and Yamaguchi, Kota},
  booktitle={SIGGRAPH Asia 2024 Technical Communications},
  pages={1--4},
  year={2024}
}
design-principles
graphic-design-evaluation
human-annotation

Contributors

shunk031

103 commits

creative-graphic-design/GraphicDesignEvaluation

Dataset

Dataset Card for GraphicDesignEvaluation

1

103 commits

1 linked in READMEs

updated Jun 26, 2026

See the code

README

Dataset Card for GraphicDesignEvaluation

CI Sync HF

Dataset Description

Dataset Summary

GraphicDesignEvaluation is a human-rated benchmark released with Can GPTs Evaluate Graphic Design Based on Design Principles?. The paper compares GPT-based evaluation and heuristic metrics against human ratings for three representative design principles: alignment, overlap, and white space. The dataset contains graphic banner designs curated from an online service, perturbed low-quality variants, and human annotations collected from 60 subjects.

Supported Tasks and Leaderboards

The dataset supports graphic design quality evaluation, human/model score correlation analysis, and design-principle-specific assessment. No public leaderboard is bundled with this Hugging Face dataset.

Languages

Annotations and evaluation descriptions are in English (en).

Dataset Structure

Data Fields

Absolute configs contain image_id, image, perturbation, scores, and avg. Relative configs contain image_id, image, comparative, scores, and avg.

Data Splits

All configs expose a single train split. Absolute configs have 400 rows each; relative configs have 300 rows each.

Dataset Creation

The dataset was created to study whether GPT-based evaluators can assess graphic design quality according to core design principles and how those scores compare with human annotations.

Considerations for Using the Data

The dataset is small and principle-specific. It should be used as an evaluation resource rather than a complete measure of graphic design quality.

Additional Information

Licensing Information

The local loader lists the dataset license as Apache 2.0.

Citation Information

@inproceedings{haraguchi2024can,
  title={Can GPTs Evaluate Graphic Design Based on Design Principles?},
  author={Haraguchi, Daichi and Inoue, Naoto and Shimoda, Wataru and Mitani, Hayato and Uchida, Seiichi and Yamaguchi, Kota},
  booktitle={SIGGRAPH Asia 2024 Technical Communications},
  pages={1--4},
  year={2024}
}
design-principles
graphic-design-evaluation
human-annotation

Contributors

shunk031

103 commits