MME-Reasoning π₯: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Logical Reasoning in MLLMs
12
17 commits
1 linked in READMEs
updated Jun 13, 2025
Official repository for "MME-Reasoning: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Logical Reasoning in MLLMs".
π For more details, please refer to the project page.
[πProject Page] [π Paper] [ποΈ Github] [π Leaderboard]
Logical reasoning is a fundamental aspect of human intelligence and an essential capability for multimodal large language models (MLLMs). Existing benchmarks fail to comprehensively evaluate MLLMs reasoning abilities due to the lack of explicit categorization for logical reasoning types and an unclear understanding of reasoning.
In this paper, we introduce MME-Reasoning, a comprehensive benchmark specifically designed to evaluate the reasoning capability of MLLMs. MME-Reasoning consists of 1,188 carefully curated questions that systematically cover types of logical reasoning (inductive, deductive, and abductive), while spanning a range of difficulty levels.
Experiments were conducted on state-of-the-art MLLMs, covering Chat and Thinking types of both open-source and closed-source. Evaluations with MME-Reasoning reveal these key findings: (1) MLLMs exhibit significant limitations and pronounced imbalances in reasoning capabilities. (2) Abductive reasoning remains a major bottleneck for current MLLMs. (3) Reasoning length scales with task difficulty, benefiting performance but accompanied by marginal effects and decreasing token efficiency. We hope MME-Reasoning serves as a foundation for advancing multimodal reasoning in MLLMs.
We are working to integrate the MME-Reasoning into existing VLMs evaluation frameworks. For the current version of the evaluation, please following the follows steps:
LMUData (note the images should exist under $LMUDATA/MMEReasoning/images/)vlmeval/dataset/mmereasoning/mmereasoning.py in line 19 and line 25.python run.py --data MMEReasoning --model your_model --mode infer --verbose
python test_mme_reasoning.py --file_path response_file
The response file exists in outputs dir and ends with scores.xlsx.π The Leaderboard is continuously being updated, welcoming the contribution of your excellent MLLMs!
To contribute your model to the leaderboard, please email the prediction files to π§jkyuan112@gmail.com or pengts521@gmail.com.
If you find MME-Reasoning useful for your research and applications, please kindly cite using this BibTeX:
@article{yuan2025mme,
title={MME-Reasoning: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Logical Reasoning in MLLMs},
author={Yuan, Jiakang and Peng, Tianshuo and Jiang, Yilei and Lu, Yiting and Zhang, Renrui and Feng, Kaituo and Fu, Chaoyou and Chen, Tao and Bai, Lei and Zhang, Bo and others},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.21327},
year={2025}
}
10 commits
7 commits
MME-Reasoning π₯: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Logical Reasoning in MLLMs
12
17 commits
1 linked in READMEs
updated Jun 13, 2025
Official repository for "MME-Reasoning: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Logical Reasoning in MLLMs".
π For more details, please refer to the project page.
[πProject Page] [π Paper] [ποΈ Github] [π Leaderboard]
Logical reasoning is a fundamental aspect of human intelligence and an essential capability for multimodal large language models (MLLMs). Existing benchmarks fail to comprehensively evaluate MLLMs reasoning abilities due to the lack of explicit categorization for logical reasoning types and an unclear understanding of reasoning.
In this paper, we introduce MME-Reasoning, a comprehensive benchmark specifically designed to evaluate the reasoning capability of MLLMs. MME-Reasoning consists of 1,188 carefully curated questions that systematically cover types of logical reasoning (inductive, deductive, and abductive), while spanning a range of difficulty levels.
Experiments were conducted on state-of-the-art MLLMs, covering Chat and Thinking types of both open-source and closed-source. Evaluations with MME-Reasoning reveal these key findings: (1) MLLMs exhibit significant limitations and pronounced imbalances in reasoning capabilities. (2) Abductive reasoning remains a major bottleneck for current MLLMs. (3) Reasoning length scales with task difficulty, benefiting performance but accompanied by marginal effects and decreasing token efficiency. We hope MME-Reasoning serves as a foundation for advancing multimodal reasoning in MLLMs.
We are working to integrate the MME-Reasoning into existing VLMs evaluation frameworks. For the current version of the evaluation, please following the follows steps:
LMUData (note the images should exist under $LMUDATA/MMEReasoning/images/)vlmeval/dataset/mmereasoning/mmereasoning.py in line 19 and line 25.python run.py --data MMEReasoning --model your_model --mode infer --verbose
python test_mme_reasoning.py --file_path response_file
The response file exists in outputs dir and ends with scores.xlsx.π The Leaderboard is continuously being updated, welcoming the contribution of your excellent MLLMs!
To contribute your model to the leaderboard, please email the prediction files to π§jkyuan112@gmail.com or pengts521@gmail.com.
If you find MME-Reasoning useful for your research and applications, please kindly cite using this BibTeX:
@article{yuan2025mme,
title={MME-Reasoning: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Logical Reasoning in MLLMs},
author={Yuan, Jiakang and Peng, Tianshuo and Jiang, Yilei and Lu, Yiting and Zhang, Renrui and Feng, Kaituo and Fu, Chaoyou and Chen, Tao and Bai, Lei and Zhang, Bo and others},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.21327},
year={2025}
}
10 commits
7 commits