This repo contains the evaluation datasets used in the paper "Language Model Re-rankers are Fooled by Lexical Similarities" accepted to FEVER 2025.
The datasets in this repo are based on the NQ, LitQA2 (from LAB-Bench) and DRUID datasets. More details on the datasets can be found in our paper.
We release the NQ, LitQA2 and DRUID datasets used in our re-ranker analysis. For LitQA2 we have two variants (LitQA2-o and LitQA2); one with the answer options appended and one without. We primarily use the former variation in our analysis as this corresponded to an improved re-ranker performance.
The datasets correspond to 3 different splits each:
standard: The standard version of the dataset. For LitQA2, we only have the standard split since only LitQA2-o was used for the continued analysis.title: Same as the standard version, but with titles prepended to the passages.context: Same as the standard version, but with contextualizing contexts (generated by GPT-4o) prepended to the passages. This split does not exist for DRUID.prompt: Same as the standard version, but for which the queries have been formatted to better suit the re-ranking task. This split only exists for DRUID.All datasets contains the following columns:
nq_example_id/id/claim_id: The id column for NQ/LitQA2/DRUID.question: The query for which we would like to re-rank passages.chunks: The passages available given a corresponding query.gold_chunk_ix: The index of the gold chunk (in the list of chunks).The datasets also contain various data-specific columns indicating other dataset-specific variables.
The dataset creation is described in our paper and in our GitHub repo.
@misc{languagemodelrerankersfooled,
title={Language Model Re-rankers are Fooled by Lexical Similarities},
author={Lovisa Hagström and Ercong Nie and Ruben Halifa and Helmut Schmid and Richard Johansson and Alexander Junge},
year={2025},
eprint={2502.17036},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.CL},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.17036},
}
4 commits
This repo contains the evaluation datasets used in the paper "Language Model Re-rankers are Fooled by Lexical Similarities" accepted to FEVER 2025.
The datasets in this repo are based on the NQ, LitQA2 (from LAB-Bench) and DRUID datasets. More details on the datasets can be found in our paper.
We release the NQ, LitQA2 and DRUID datasets used in our re-ranker analysis. For LitQA2 we have two variants (LitQA2-o and LitQA2); one with the answer options appended and one without. We primarily use the former variation in our analysis as this corresponded to an improved re-ranker performance.
The datasets correspond to 3 different splits each:
standard: The standard version of the dataset. For LitQA2, we only have the standard split since only LitQA2-o was used for the continued analysis.title: Same as the standard version, but with titles prepended to the passages.context: Same as the standard version, but with contextualizing contexts (generated by GPT-4o) prepended to the passages. This split does not exist for DRUID.prompt: Same as the standard version, but for which the queries have been formatted to better suit the re-ranking task. This split only exists for DRUID.All datasets contains the following columns:
nq_example_id/id/claim_id: The id column for NQ/LitQA2/DRUID.question: The query for which we would like to re-rank passages.chunks: The passages available given a corresponding query.gold_chunk_ix: The index of the gold chunk (in the list of chunks).The datasets also contain various data-specific columns indicating other dataset-specific variables.
The dataset creation is described in our paper and in our GitHub repo.
@misc{languagemodelrerankersfooled,
title={Language Model Re-rankers are Fooled by Lexical Similarities},
author={Lovisa Hagström and Ercong Nie and Ruben Halifa and Helmut Schmid and Richard Johansson and Alexander Junge},
year={2025},
eprint={2502.17036},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.CL},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.17036},
}
4 commits