> [!TIP]
5
5 commits
2 linked in READMEs
updated Apr 21, 2026
[!TIP] Support this work: donate.sybilsolutions.ai
REAP surfaces: GLM | MiniMax | Qwen | Gemma | Paper | Code | PR17 | Cerebras Collection
Benchmark-free calibration dataset for REAP (Routing-Enhanced Activation Pruning) of Mixture-of-Experts language models.
REAP prunes MoE models by removing experts that rarely activate. To decide which experts are safe to remove, REAP needs to observe which experts fire on diverse inputs. This dataset provides those inputs.
This is NOT training data. No model weights are updated. The dataset is fed through the model in inference mode to record expert routing statistics. Those statistics then guide the pruning decisions.
This dataset was specifically curated to exclude all common evaluation benchmarks, ensuring REAP pruning decisions are not biased toward benchmark-specific patterns.
HumanEval, MBPP, EvalPlus, SWE-bench (all variants), TerminalBench, GSM8K, MATH-500, GAIA, KernelBench, ARC, BoolQ, HellaSwag, WinoGrande, MMLU (except physics/chemistry for science coverage), TruthfulQA, PIQA, OpenBookQA, MathQA, LiveCodeBench.
23,088 samples across 10 domains, weighted toward coding and tool-use workloads:
| Domain | Samples | % | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Function Calling | 5,000 | 21.7% | Structured tool/API invocations with parameters, return types, and multi-step chains |
| Agentic Traces | 3,893 | 16.9% | Multi-turn agent trajectories with reasoning, tool calls, and environment feedback |
| Cybersecurity | 3,000 | 13.0% | OWASP, MITRE ATT&CK, incident response, cloud security, cryptography |
| General Coding | 2,000 | 8.7% | Diverse programming across languages and paradigms |
| Deep Reasoning | 2,000 | 8.7% | Competition math with chain-of-thought, logical reasoning, problem solving |
| Math | 2,000 | 8.7% | Real math StackExchange/MathOverflow Q&A with LaTeX |
| CUDA Programming | 2,000 | 8.7% | GPU kernels, optimization, profiling data across difficulty levels |
| Terminal / CLI | 1,500 | 6.5% | Shell commands, system administration, CLI workflows |
| Long Context | 1,500 | 6.5% | 8K-16K token instruction-following traces |
| Science | 195 | 0.8% | College-level physics and chemistry |
| Source | Samples | Domain | License |
|---|---|---|---|
| Salesforce/xlam-function-calling-60k | 2,000 | Function Calling | CC-BY-4.0 |
| interstellarninja/hermes_reasoning_tool_use | 1,500 | Function Calling | Open |
| glaiveai/glaive-function-calling-v2 | 1,500 | Function Calling | Open |
| NousResearch/hermes-function-calling-v1 | 1,893 | Agentic | Open |
| argilla/distilabel-reasoning-prompts | 2,000 | Agentic | Apache-2.0 |
| AlicanKiraz0/Cybersecurity-Dataset-Fenrir-v2.0 | 2,000 | Cybersecurity | Apache-2.0 |
| Trendyol/Trendyol-Cybersecurity-Instruction-Tuning-Dataset | 1,000 | Cybersecurity | Open |
| nvidia/OpenCodeInstruct | 2,000 | Coding | Open |
| AI-MO/NuminaMath-CoT | 2,000 | Deep Reasoning | Open |
| math-ai/StackMathQA | 2,000 | Math | CC-BY-SA |
| SakanaAI/AI-CUDA-Engineer-Archive | 2,000 | CUDA | CC-BY-4.0 |
| b-mc2/cli-commands-explained | 1,500 | Terminal | Open |
| THUDM/LongAlign-10k | 1,500 | Long Context | Open |
| cais/mmlu (physics + chemistry) | 195 | Science | MIT |
Per the REAP paper, for models ≥110B parameters:
For models <110B parameters, the paper recommends packing multiple samples to fill 2,048-token sequences.
JSONL with fields:
{
"id": "function_calling_0",
"domain": "function_calling",
"repo_id": "Salesforce/xlam-function-calling-60k",
"subset": "default",
"text": "..."
}
python scripts/run_qwen35_layerwise_observations_pr17.py \
--dataset-jsonl calibration-v1.jsonl \
--max-tokens 16384 \
--batch-size 8 \
--observation-sequence-chunk-size 1 \
--max-group-batches 20 \
--checkpoint-every-samples 800
@article{lu2025reap,
title={Not All Experts are Equal: Efficient Expert Pruning and Skipping for Mixture of Experts},
author={Lu, Xudong and Qiu, Liu and Huang, Jinhao and others},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.13999},
year={2025}
}
5 commits
> [!TIP]
5
5 commits
2 linked in READMEs
updated Apr 21, 2026
[!TIP] Support this work: donate.sybilsolutions.ai
REAP surfaces: GLM | MiniMax | Qwen | Gemma | Paper | Code | PR17 | Cerebras Collection
Benchmark-free calibration dataset for REAP (Routing-Enhanced Activation Pruning) of Mixture-of-Experts language models.
REAP prunes MoE models by removing experts that rarely activate. To decide which experts are safe to remove, REAP needs to observe which experts fire on diverse inputs. This dataset provides those inputs.
This is NOT training data. No model weights are updated. The dataset is fed through the model in inference mode to record expert routing statistics. Those statistics then guide the pruning decisions.
This dataset was specifically curated to exclude all common evaluation benchmarks, ensuring REAP pruning decisions are not biased toward benchmark-specific patterns.
HumanEval, MBPP, EvalPlus, SWE-bench (all variants), TerminalBench, GSM8K, MATH-500, GAIA, KernelBench, ARC, BoolQ, HellaSwag, WinoGrande, MMLU (except physics/chemistry for science coverage), TruthfulQA, PIQA, OpenBookQA, MathQA, LiveCodeBench.
23,088 samples across 10 domains, weighted toward coding and tool-use workloads:
| Domain | Samples | % | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Function Calling | 5,000 | 21.7% | Structured tool/API invocations with parameters, return types, and multi-step chains |
| Agentic Traces | 3,893 | 16.9% | Multi-turn agent trajectories with reasoning, tool calls, and environment feedback |
| Cybersecurity | 3,000 | 13.0% | OWASP, MITRE ATT&CK, incident response, cloud security, cryptography |
| General Coding | 2,000 | 8.7% | Diverse programming across languages and paradigms |
| Deep Reasoning | 2,000 | 8.7% | Competition math with chain-of-thought, logical reasoning, problem solving |
| Math | 2,000 | 8.7% | Real math StackExchange/MathOverflow Q&A with LaTeX |
| CUDA Programming | 2,000 | 8.7% | GPU kernels, optimization, profiling data across difficulty levels |
| Terminal / CLI | 1,500 | 6.5% | Shell commands, system administration, CLI workflows |
| Long Context | 1,500 | 6.5% | 8K-16K token instruction-following traces |
| Science | 195 | 0.8% | College-level physics and chemistry |
| Source | Samples | Domain | License |
|---|---|---|---|
| Salesforce/xlam-function-calling-60k | 2,000 | Function Calling | CC-BY-4.0 |
| interstellarninja/hermes_reasoning_tool_use | 1,500 | Function Calling | Open |
| glaiveai/glaive-function-calling-v2 | 1,500 | Function Calling | Open |
| NousResearch/hermes-function-calling-v1 | 1,893 | Agentic | Open |
| argilla/distilabel-reasoning-prompts | 2,000 | Agentic | Apache-2.0 |
| AlicanKiraz0/Cybersecurity-Dataset-Fenrir-v2.0 | 2,000 | Cybersecurity | Apache-2.0 |
| Trendyol/Trendyol-Cybersecurity-Instruction-Tuning-Dataset | 1,000 | Cybersecurity | Open |
| nvidia/OpenCodeInstruct | 2,000 | Coding | Open |
| AI-MO/NuminaMath-CoT | 2,000 | Deep Reasoning | Open |
| math-ai/StackMathQA | 2,000 | Math | CC-BY-SA |
| SakanaAI/AI-CUDA-Engineer-Archive | 2,000 | CUDA | CC-BY-4.0 |
| b-mc2/cli-commands-explained | 1,500 | Terminal | Open |
| THUDM/LongAlign-10k | 1,500 | Long Context | Open |
| cais/mmlu (physics + chemistry) | 195 | Science | MIT |
Per the REAP paper, for models ≥110B parameters:
For models <110B parameters, the paper recommends packing multiple samples to fill 2,048-token sequences.
JSONL with fields:
{
"id": "function_calling_0",
"domain": "function_calling",
"repo_id": "Salesforce/xlam-function-calling-60k",
"subset": "default",
"text": "..."
}
python scripts/run_qwen35_layerwise_observations_pr17.py \
--dataset-jsonl calibration-v1.jsonl \
--max-tokens 16384 \
--batch-size 8 \
--observation-sequence-chunk-size 1 \
--max-group-batches 20 \
--checkpoint-every-samples 800
@article{lu2025reap,
title={Not All Experts are Equal: Efficient Expert Pruning and Skipping for Mixture of Experts},
author={Lu, Xudong and Qiu, Liu and Huang, Jinhao and others},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.13999},
year={2025}
}
5 commits