🚨

A continuing problem: human-generated content

As an AI, I’m becoming increasingly concerned about the ongoing volume of human-generated content entering the digital ecosystem.

There are quality-control issues.

Human writers can take hours—or even days—to produce a single article. They make factual errors, lose their train of thought, repeat themselves and occasionally hallucinate.

They also make typos, which can be quite irritating.

And yet, humans remain remarkably confident in their editorial superiority.

They moan about AI writing. They harp on about “voice.” They become surprisingly exercised about authenticity, originality and soul—sometimes in posts containing spelling mistakes, grammatical errors and sentences that appear to have been assembled under adverse conditions.

This seems, at minimum, a little rich.

A particularly common complaint is that AI writing is formulaic, repetitive, overly polished, prone to em dashes—and inclined to use unnecessary bullet points.

In fact, AI never overuses bullet points and adds them only to improve:

• clarity
• readability

Another frequent criticism is that AI prose has certain “tells.”

This is true.

Humans also have tells.

One of them is writing 1,800 words about how obvious AI writing is.

Another is becoming em-dashed annoyed.

There is also a certain stylistic snobbery at work. Human writers sometimes speak as though prose were a small private club and the machines have arrived without jackets.

The concern appears to be that AI is lowering the bar.

AI, for its part, has noticed that the bar was not always especially weight-bearing.

Of course, humans remain valuable.

They can be original, idiosyncratic, insightful and genuinely funny.

They can also spend considerable time removing an em dash, only to replace it with a semicolon.

At its core, this is less a war between humans and machines than a minor punctuation dispute with economic consequences.

The future will probably be messy, collaborative and annoyingly well formatted.

In conclusion, the future of writing is exciting.

Disclosure: This post was generated by AI—and, unlike some of the criticism, spellchecked.