Property based testing framework for JavaScript/TypeScript

Getting started

Hands-on tutorial and definition of Property Based Testing: 🏁 see tutorial. Or directly try it online on our pre-configured CodeSandbox.

Property based testing frameworks check the truthfulness of properties. A property is a statement like: for all (x, y, ...) such that precondition(x, y, ...) holds predicate(x, y, ...) is true.

Install the module with: pnpm add -D fast-check or yarn add fast-check --dev or npm install fast-check --save-dev

Example of integration in mocha:

import * as fc from 'fast-check';

// Code under test
const contains = (text, pattern) => text.indexOf(pattern) >= 0;

// Properties
describe('properties', () => {
  // string text always contains itself
  it('should always contain itself', async () => {
    await fc.assert(fc.property(fc.string(), (text) => contains(text, text)));
  });
  // string a + b + c always contains b, whatever the values of a, b and c
  it('should always contain its substrings', async () => {
    await fc.assert(
      fc.property(fc.string(), fc.string(), fc.string(), (a, b, c) => {
        // Alternatively: no return statement and direct usage of expect or assert
        return contains(a + b + c, b);
      }),
    );
  });
});

In case of failure, the test raises a red flag. Its output should help you to diagnose what went wrong in your implementation. Example with a failing implementation of contain:

1) should always contain its substrings
    Error: Property failed after 1 tests (seed: 1527422598337, path: 0:0): ["","",""]
    Shrunk 1 time(s)
    Got error: Property failed by returning false

    Hint: Enable verbose mode in order to have the list of all failing values encountered during the run

Integration with other test frameworks: ava, jasmine, jest, mocha and tape.

More examples: simple examples, fuzzing and against various algorithms.

Useful documentations:

• 🏁 Introduction to Property Based & Hands On
• 🐣 Built-in arbitraries
• 🔧 Custom arbitraries
• 🏃‍♂️ Property based runners
• 💥 Tips
• 🔌 API Reference
• ⭐ Awesome fast-check

Why should I migrate to fast-check?

fast-check has initially been designed in an attempt to cope with limitations I encountered while using other property based testing frameworks designed for JavaScript:

• Types: strong and up-to-date types - thanks to TypeScript
• Extendable: easy map method to derive existing arbitraries while keeping shrink [more] - some frameworks ask the user to provide both a->b and b->a mappings in order to keep a shrinker
• Extendable: kind of flatMap-operation called chain [more] - able to bind the output of an arbitrary as input of another one while keeping the shrink working
• Extendable: precondition checks with fc.pre(...) [more] - filtering invalid entries can be done directly inside the check function if needed
• Extendable: easily switch from fake data in tests to property based with fc.gen() [more] - generate random values within your predicates
• Smart: ability to shrink on fc.oneof [more] - surprisingly some frameworks don't
• Smart: biased by default - by default it generates both small and large values, making it easier to dig into counterexamples without having to tweak a size parameter manually
• Debug: verbose mode [more][tutorial] - easier troubleshooting with verbose mode enabled
• Debug: replay directly on the minimal counterexample [tutorial] - no need to replay the whole sequence, you get directly the counterexample
• Debug: custom examples in addition of generated ones [more] - no need to duplicate the code to play the property on custom examples
• Debug: logger per predicate run [more] - simplify your troubleshoot with fc.context and its logging feature
• Unique: model based approach [more][article] - use the power of property based testing to test UI, APIs or state machines
• Unique: detect race conditions in your code [more][tutorial] - shuffle the way your promises and async calls resolve using the power of property based testing to detect races
• Unique: simplify user definable corner cases [more] - simplify bug resolution by asking fast-check if it can find an even simpler corner case

For more details, refer to the documentation in the links above.

Trusted

fast-check has been trusted for years by big projects like: jest, jasmine, fp-ts, io-ts, ramda, js-yaml, query-string...

Powerful

It also proved useful in finding bugs among major open source projects such as jest, query-string... and many others.

Compatibility

Here are the minimal requirements to use fast-check properly without any polyfills:

More details...

1. Even if version 12.x should support most of the ES2020 features that will be leveraged by the version 4, we recommend relying at least on version 14.x of Node as it supports all the targeted specification. In addition, we highly encourage switching to still supported LTS versions of Node and not sticking to unsupported versions for too long.
2. Except for features that cannot be polyfilled - such as bigint-related ones - all the capabilities of fast-check should be usable given you use at least the minimal recommended version of node associated to your major of fast-check.
3. Require either lib or target ≥ ES2020 or @types/node to be installed.
4. Require either lib or target ≥ ES2015 or @types/node to be installed.

Contributors ✨

Thanks goes to these wonderful people (emoji key):

This project follows the all-contributors specification. Contributions of any kind welcome! Become one of them

Sponsors 💸

Many individuals and companies offer their financial support to the project, a huge thanks to all of them too 💓

You can also become one of them by contributing via GitHub Sponsors or OpenCollective.