I'm new to the Literal gem, it looks really well thought out. I think they differ in approach quite substantially though, it's reminding me more of Dry Struct: https://dry-rb.org/gems/dry-struct/main/ When there's time I could try to make a comparison table

At a previous role, we used DryStructs for this, which seemed like a nice way of getting: * named variables * type validation * better documented code https://dry-rb.org/gems/dry-struct/1.6/

I can see why this was added, but I don't see myself using it anytime soon. If I just need a bundle of attributes and don't care about immutability then I will continue to use Struct. If I do need immutability I will continue to use dry-struct (https://dry-rb.org/gems/dry-struct/1.0/) which has…

Couldn't agree more. In my current life as a Ruby dev I've found the dry-struct (http://dry-rb.org/gems/dry-struct/) library a huge help in getting some level of sanity when dealing with converting inputs to data types. It also helps being able to reason about the inputs structure outside of just…