The official repository for the paper: Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Survey.
TeX
200
5 commits
updated Apr 25, 2025
English | 简体中文
The official repository for the paper: Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Survey Arxiv. This paper has been accepted by the 2024 CCF Big Data.
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has recently gained traction in natural language processing. Numerous studies and real-world applications are leveraging its ability to enhance generative models through external information retrieval. Evaluating these RAG systems, however, poses unique challenges due to their hybrid structure and reliance on dynamic knowledge sources. To better understand these challenges, we conduct A Unified Evaluation Process of RAG (Auepora) and aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the evaluation and benchmarks of RAG systems. Specifically, we examine and compare several quantifiable metrics of the Retrieval and Generation components, such as relevance, accuracy, and faithfulness, within the current RAG benchmarks, encompassing the possible output and ground truth pairs. We then analyze the various datasets and metrics, discuss the limitations of current benchmarks, and suggest potential directions to advance the field of RAG benchmarks.
If you find this paper or repository helpful, please consider citing our work:
@InProceedings{Yu2025,
author = {Yu, Hao and Gan, Aoran and Zhang, Kai and Tong, Shiwei and Liu, Qi and Liu, Zhaofeng},
booktitle = {Big Data},
title = {Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Survey},
year = {2025},
address = {Singapore},
editor = {Zhu, Wenwu and Xiong, Hui and Cheng, Xiuzhen and Cui, Lizhen and Dou, Zhicheng and Dong, Junyu and Pang, Shanchen and Wang, Li and Kong, Lanju and Chen, Zhenxiang},
pages = {102--120},
publisher = {Springer Nature Singapore},
isbn = {978-981-96-1024-2},
}
@misc{gan2025retrievalaugmentedgenerationevaluation,
title={Retrieval Augmented Generation Evaluation in the Era of Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey},
author={Aoran Gan and Hao Yu and Kai Zhang and Qi Liu and Wenyu Yan and Zhenya Huang and Shiwei Tong and Guoping Hu},
year={2025},
eprint={2504.14891},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.CL},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.14891},
}
Citation for benchmarks: benchmarks.bib
We welcome contributions to this repository, including new benchmarks, datasets, and evaluation metrics. If you have any suggestions or would like to collaborate, please open an issue or pull request.
5 commits
TeX
100.0%
The official repository for the paper: Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Survey.
TeX
200
5 commits
updated Apr 25, 2025
English | 简体中文
The official repository for the paper: Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Survey Arxiv. This paper has been accepted by the 2024 CCF Big Data.
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has recently gained traction in natural language processing. Numerous studies and real-world applications are leveraging its ability to enhance generative models through external information retrieval. Evaluating these RAG systems, however, poses unique challenges due to their hybrid structure and reliance on dynamic knowledge sources. To better understand these challenges, we conduct A Unified Evaluation Process of RAG (Auepora) and aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the evaluation and benchmarks of RAG systems. Specifically, we examine and compare several quantifiable metrics of the Retrieval and Generation components, such as relevance, accuracy, and faithfulness, within the current RAG benchmarks, encompassing the possible output and ground truth pairs. We then analyze the various datasets and metrics, discuss the limitations of current benchmarks, and suggest potential directions to advance the field of RAG benchmarks.
If you find this paper or repository helpful, please consider citing our work:
@InProceedings{Yu2025,
author = {Yu, Hao and Gan, Aoran and Zhang, Kai and Tong, Shiwei and Liu, Qi and Liu, Zhaofeng},
booktitle = {Big Data},
title = {Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Survey},
year = {2025},
address = {Singapore},
editor = {Zhu, Wenwu and Xiong, Hui and Cheng, Xiuzhen and Cui, Lizhen and Dou, Zhicheng and Dong, Junyu and Pang, Shanchen and Wang, Li and Kong, Lanju and Chen, Zhenxiang},
pages = {102--120},
publisher = {Springer Nature Singapore},
isbn = {978-981-96-1024-2},
}
@misc{gan2025retrievalaugmentedgenerationevaluation,
title={Retrieval Augmented Generation Evaluation in the Era of Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey},
author={Aoran Gan and Hao Yu and Kai Zhang and Qi Liu and Wenyu Yan and Zhenya Huang and Shiwei Tong and Guoping Hu},
year={2025},
eprint={2504.14891},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.CL},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.14891},
}
Citation for benchmarks: benchmarks.bib
We welcome contributions to this repository, including new benchmarks, datasets, and evaluation metrics. If you have any suggestions or would like to collaborate, please open an issue or pull request.
5 commits
TeX
100.0%