11xiaoyi11/IQA-Survey

A Survey on Image Quality Assessment: Insights, Analysis, and Future Outlook

21

43 commits

updated Oct 13, 2026

See the code

README

A Survey on IQA: Insights, Analysis, and Future Outlook

img1

🔍 Introduction

Image Quality Assessment (IQA) is a critical component of image-related technologies and plays a pivotal role in the advancement of image processing and computer vision. In recent years, the proliferation of novel training frameworks and machine learning models has given rise to a multitude of IQA methodologies. This survey conducts a comprehensive review of nearly 200 IQA-related publications, synthesizing key developments in the field and systematically categorizing existing approaches based on their underlying models, training frameworks, publication timelines, application scenarios, and academic impact. This structured analysis aims to facilitate a swift introduction for newcomers while providing seasoned researchers with a clearer perspective on the current state of the field. Moreover, we offer a critical evaluation of the advantages and limitations of various IQA methods and present our perspectives on future research directions. To complement the survey, this repository compiles both the IQA techniques discussed in the paper and other approaches that could not be included due to space constraints, thereby serving as a valuable resource to support further advancements in IQA research.

图像质量评估(IQA)在图像相关的技术中起着非常重要的作用,对于图像处理和计算机视觉领域的技术发展有着深远的影响。近年来,随着新型训练框架和机器学习模型的出现,许多IQA方法涌现出来。本综述通过调研接近二百篇IQA相关论文,总结了IQA发展中值得关注的工作,并按照不同方法所用的模型、训练框架、发表时间、使用场景和影响力进行了整理,以方便初学者快速入门、资深研究者更好地了解领域发展现状。随后,我们对诸多IQA方法的优缺点进行了分析,对IQA方法的未来发展提出了自己的见解。本repository旨在列出论文中提到的、以及受篇幅限制未提到的经典IQA方法,配合论文阅读,以促进IQA技术的发展。

🚀English Paper link: A Survey on Image Quality Assessment: Insights, Analysis, and Future Outlook
🚀Chinese Paper link: 在计算机视觉领域中,我们应该如何评估图像质量(万字长文)?
🚀The simplified chinese version: 什么样的图像才是好的图像?近200篇文献总结图像质量检测的最新进展与挑战

Update Records

  • 🔥 [Mar.2,2025] The chinese version of our survey has been released on zhihu.
  • 🔥 [Feb.12,2025] The first version of our survey has been released on arXiv.

📜 Table of Contents

👨‍💻 Contributers

💡 Citation

  • If you find this survey useful, please consider citing it.

📧 Contact Us

📚 Image Quality Assessment Methods

img2

img3

Citation counts below were queried from OpenAlex on October 13, 2026. Paper identities were matched automatically by normalized exact title and publication year; these matches have not been individually verified. Counts link to their OpenAlex records. ** ** marks unresolved matches, not zero. Rows without a specific paper retain blank cells. OpenAlex counts use a different database coverage and version grouping from other services; differences from the original numbers must not be interpreted as citation growth. The original February 1, 2025 citation snapshot is preserved for historical reference.

MetricsCitation number (OpenAlex, Oct.13,2026)Earliest publication timeWith/Without referencePaper name
📖HVS-Based Method
signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)With
peak SNR (PSNR)With
mean squared error (MSE)With
structural similarity (SSIM)573542004.04With Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity
multi-scale SSIM (MS-SSIM)58882004.05WithMultiscale structural similarity for image quality assessment
universal image quality index (UQI)57322002.03WithA universal image quality index
feature similarity index (FSIM)51952011.01WithFSIM: A feature similarity index for image quality assessment
Visual information fidelity (VIF)40822006.02WithImage information and visual quality
Most Apparent Distortion (MAD)19452010.01WithMost apparent distortion: Full-reference image quality assessment and the role of strategy
Gradient Magnitude Similarity Deviation (GMSD)16842013.12WithGradient magnitude similarity deviation: A highly efficient perceptual image quality index
Visual SNR (VSNR)11462007.08WithVSNR: A wavelet-based visual signal-to-noise ratio for natural images
Information content Weighted SSIM (IW-SSIM)12982010.11WithInformation content weighting for perceptual image quality assessment
7862002.05WithWhy is image quality assessment so difficult?
Visual Saliency-induced Index(VSI)10262014.08WithVSI: A visual saliency-induced index for perceptual image quality assessment
GSIM7012011.11WithImage quality assessment based on gradient similarity
complex wavelets-SSIM (CW-SSIM)2832005.05WithTranslation insensitive image similarity in complex wavelet domain
HVS-based peak SNR (PSNR-HVS)2392006.01WithA new full-reference quality metrics based on HVS
RR-SSIM2722012.08WithReduced-reference image quality assessment by structural similarity estimation
PSIM2372017.05WithA fast reliable image quality predictor by fusing micro- and macro-structures
📖Transform Domain-Based Method
BLIINDS-II17502012.03WithoutBlind image quality assessment: A natural scene statistics approach in the DCT domain
4302005.03WithReduced-reference image quality assessment using a wavelet-domain natural image statistic model
3232006.02An SVD-based grayscale image quality measure for local and global assessment
SFF1582013.06WithSparse feature fidelity for perceptual image quality assessment
422015.07WithImage quality assessment: a sparse learning way
QASD442016.06WithSparse representation-based image quality index with adaptive sub-dictionaries
442017.11WithFrom sparse coding significance to perceptual quality: a new approach for image quality assessment
📖NSS-Based Method
29642006.10A statistical evaluation of recent full reference image quality assessment algorithms
IFC13962005.11WithAn information fidelity criterion for image quality assessment using natural scene statistics
Tone-Mapped images Quality Index (TMQI)6302012.10WithObjective quality assessment of tone-mapped images
3012007.09Blind image quality assessment through anisotropy
Dynamic Range Independent quality Measure (DRIM) 2008.08WithDynamic range independent image quality assessment
📖Traditional Machine Learning Method
BRISQUE59752012.08WithoutNo-reference image quality assessment in the spatial domain
DIIVINE17582011.01WithoutBlind image quality assessment: From natural scene statistics to perceptual quality
IL-NIQE12942015.04WithoutA feature-enriched completely blind image quality evaluator
2272009.03WithoutNo-reference image quality assessment using modified extreme learning machine classifier
Multi-Method Fusion (MMF)1952012.12WithImage quality assessment using multi-method fusion
1472010.01Objective image quality assessment based on support vector regression
SVDR1522011.09WithSVD-based quality metric for image and video using machine learning
1642015.03WithoutBlind Image Quality Assessment Based on Multichannel Feature Fusion and Label Transfer
ParaBoost922015.12WithA paraboost method to image quality assessment
📖CNN-Based Method
139442018.01The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metric
IQA-CNN12672014.09WithoutConvolutional neural networks for no-reference image quality assessment
2017.10FR+NRDeep neural networks for no-reference and full-reference image quality assessment
DISTS9392020.12WithImage Quality Assessment: Unifying Structure and Texture Similarity
BIQA by a Self-Adaptive
Hyper Network
8412020.06WithoutBlindly Assess Image Quality in the Wild Guided by a Self-Adaptive Hyper Network
MEON6192017.11End-to-end blind image quality assessment using deep neural networks
RankIQA5132017.07WithoutRankIQA: Learning from rankings for no-reference image quality assessment
BIECON4582016.12WithoutFully deep blind image quality predictor
3682014.08Blind image quality assessment via deep learning
DeepBIQ2772016.02WithoutOn the use of deep learning for blind image quality assessment
Deep image Quality Assessment (DeepQA)2642017.10WithDeep learning of human visual sensitivity in image quality assessment framework
DeepSim1722017.09WithDeepSim: deep similarity for image quality assessment
942014.09WithoutBlind image quality assessment using semi-supervised rectifier networks
Re-IQA1442023.04WithoutRe-IQA: Unsupervised Learning for Image Quality Assessment in the Wild
Multi-Pooled Inception Features for NR IQA372020.02WithoutMulti-Pooled Inception Features for No-Reference Image Quality Assessment
IQMA Network242021.06WithIQMA Network: Image Quality Multi-Scale Assessment Network
📖Transformer-Based Method
MUSIQ9502021.08WithoutMUSIQ: Multi-Scale Image Quality Transformer
ViT with relative ranking
and self-consistency
4442021.08WithoutNo-reference image quality assessment via transformers, relative ranking,and self-consistency
Maniqa 2022.04WithoutManiqa: Muli-dimension attention network for no-reference image quality assessment
TRIQ 2020.12WithoutTransformer for Image Quality Assessment
IQT1682021.04WithPerceptual Image Quality Assessment With Transformers
NTIRE 2021 Challenge
on Perceptual IQA
552021.05NTIRE 2021 Challenge on Perceptual Image Quality Assessment
NTIRE 2022 Challenge
on Perceptual IQA
2022.06NTIRE 2022 Challenge on Perceptual Image Quality Assessment
Jacobian Lens Distance (JLD)2026.10WithJLD: Perceptual Distance Through A Jacobian Lens
📖Framework-Based Method
QAC4042013.06WithoutLearning without human scores for blind image quality assessment
MetalQA 2020.04WithoutMetalQA: Deep Meta-Learning for No-Reference Image Quality Assessment
3312018.06Deep CNN-based blind image quality predictor
UNIQUE3252021.03WithoutUncertainty-Aware Blind Image Quality Assessment in the Laboratory and Wild
Hallucinated-IQA2642018.04WithoutHallucinated-IQA: No-reference image quality assessment via adversarial learning
CONTRIQUE2842022.06WithoutImage quality assessment using contrastive learning
DeepFL-IQA312020.01WithoutDeepFL-IQA: Weak Supervision for Deep IQA Feature Learning
CVRDK-IQA492022.02WithoutContent-Variant Reference Image Quality Assessment via Knowledge Distillation
CNN-Based Medical
Ultrasound IQA
292021.07WithoutCNN-Based Medical Ultrasound Image Quality Assessment
📖Medical IQA
4292018.04WithoutQuantitative assessment of structural image quality
📖IQA for Dehazing Algorithm
2522019.02WithQuality evaluation of image dehazing methods using synthetic hazy images
📖Portrait Quality Assessment
162024.04WithoutDeep Portrait Quality Assessment. A NTIRE 2024 Challenge Survey
📖IQA for Low Light Enhancement
NLIEE472021.06WithoutA no-reference evaluation metric for low-light image enhancement
📖Specific Distortion
7592009.04WithoutA no-reference objective image sharpness metric based on the notion of just noticeable blur (JNB)
BIBLE2702015.01WithoutNo-reference image blur assessment based on discrete orthogonal moments
1012013.11A no-reference metric for evaluating the quality of motion deblurring
222015.02WithoutFull reference image quality metrics for JPEG compressed images

👨‍💻 Contributers

💡 Citation

If you find this survey useful, please cite our paper:

@misc{ma2025surveyimagequalityassessment,
      title={A Survey on Image Quality Assessment: Insights, Analysis, and Future Outlook}, 
      author={Chengqian Ma and Zhengyi Shi and Zhiqiang Lu and Shenghao Xie and Fei Chao and Yao Sui},
      year={2025},
      eprint={2502.08540},
      archivePrefix={arXiv},
      primaryClass={cs.CV},
      url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.08540}, 
}

📧 Contact Us

If you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us via:

11xiaoyi11/IQA-Survey

A Survey on Image Quality Assessment: Insights, Analysis, and Future Outlook

21

43 commits

updated Oct 13, 2026

See the code

README

A Survey on IQA: Insights, Analysis, and Future Outlook

img1

🔍 Introduction

Image Quality Assessment (IQA) is a critical component of image-related technologies and plays a pivotal role in the advancement of image processing and computer vision. In recent years, the proliferation of novel training frameworks and machine learning models has given rise to a multitude of IQA methodologies. This survey conducts a comprehensive review of nearly 200 IQA-related publications, synthesizing key developments in the field and systematically categorizing existing approaches based on their underlying models, training frameworks, publication timelines, application scenarios, and academic impact. This structured analysis aims to facilitate a swift introduction for newcomers while providing seasoned researchers with a clearer perspective on the current state of the field. Moreover, we offer a critical evaluation of the advantages and limitations of various IQA methods and present our perspectives on future research directions. To complement the survey, this repository compiles both the IQA techniques discussed in the paper and other approaches that could not be included due to space constraints, thereby serving as a valuable resource to support further advancements in IQA research.

图像质量评估(IQA)在图像相关的技术中起着非常重要的作用,对于图像处理和计算机视觉领域的技术发展有着深远的影响。近年来,随着新型训练框架和机器学习模型的出现,许多IQA方法涌现出来。本综述通过调研接近二百篇IQA相关论文,总结了IQA发展中值得关注的工作,并按照不同方法所用的模型、训练框架、发表时间、使用场景和影响力进行了整理,以方便初学者快速入门、资深研究者更好地了解领域发展现状。随后,我们对诸多IQA方法的优缺点进行了分析,对IQA方法的未来发展提出了自己的见解。本repository旨在列出论文中提到的、以及受篇幅限制未提到的经典IQA方法,配合论文阅读,以促进IQA技术的发展。

🚀English Paper link: A Survey on Image Quality Assessment: Insights, Analysis, and Future Outlook
🚀Chinese Paper link: 在计算机视觉领域中,我们应该如何评估图像质量(万字长文)?
🚀The simplified chinese version: 什么样的图像才是好的图像?近200篇文献总结图像质量检测的最新进展与挑战

Update Records

  • 🔥 [Mar.2,2025] The chinese version of our survey has been released on zhihu.
  • 🔥 [Feb.12,2025] The first version of our survey has been released on arXiv.

📜 Table of Contents

👨‍💻 Contributers

💡 Citation

  • If you find this survey useful, please consider citing it.

📧 Contact Us

📚 Image Quality Assessment Methods

img2

img3

Citation counts below were queried from OpenAlex on October 13, 2026. Paper identities were matched automatically by normalized exact title and publication year; these matches have not been individually verified. Counts link to their OpenAlex records. ** ** marks unresolved matches, not zero. Rows without a specific paper retain blank cells. OpenAlex counts use a different database coverage and version grouping from other services; differences from the original numbers must not be interpreted as citation growth. The original February 1, 2025 citation snapshot is preserved for historical reference.

MetricsCitation number (OpenAlex, Oct.13,2026)Earliest publication timeWith/Without referencePaper name
📖HVS-Based Method
signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)With
peak SNR (PSNR)With
mean squared error (MSE)With
structural similarity (SSIM)573542004.04With Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity
multi-scale SSIM (MS-SSIM)58882004.05WithMultiscale structural similarity for image quality assessment
universal image quality index (UQI)57322002.03WithA universal image quality index
feature similarity index (FSIM)51952011.01WithFSIM: A feature similarity index for image quality assessment
Visual information fidelity (VIF)40822006.02WithImage information and visual quality
Most Apparent Distortion (MAD)19452010.01WithMost apparent distortion: Full-reference image quality assessment and the role of strategy
Gradient Magnitude Similarity Deviation (GMSD)16842013.12WithGradient magnitude similarity deviation: A highly efficient perceptual image quality index
Visual SNR (VSNR)11462007.08WithVSNR: A wavelet-based visual signal-to-noise ratio for natural images
Information content Weighted SSIM (IW-SSIM)12982010.11WithInformation content weighting for perceptual image quality assessment
7862002.05WithWhy is image quality assessment so difficult?
Visual Saliency-induced Index(VSI)10262014.08WithVSI: A visual saliency-induced index for perceptual image quality assessment
GSIM7012011.11WithImage quality assessment based on gradient similarity
complex wavelets-SSIM (CW-SSIM)2832005.05WithTranslation insensitive image similarity in complex wavelet domain
HVS-based peak SNR (PSNR-HVS)2392006.01WithA new full-reference quality metrics based on HVS
RR-SSIM2722012.08WithReduced-reference image quality assessment by structural similarity estimation
PSIM2372017.05WithA fast reliable image quality predictor by fusing micro- and macro-structures
📖Transform Domain-Based Method
BLIINDS-II17502012.03WithoutBlind image quality assessment: A natural scene statistics approach in the DCT domain
4302005.03WithReduced-reference image quality assessment using a wavelet-domain natural image statistic model
3232006.02An SVD-based grayscale image quality measure for local and global assessment
SFF1582013.06WithSparse feature fidelity for perceptual image quality assessment
422015.07WithImage quality assessment: a sparse learning way
QASD442016.06WithSparse representation-based image quality index with adaptive sub-dictionaries
442017.11WithFrom sparse coding significance to perceptual quality: a new approach for image quality assessment
📖NSS-Based Method
29642006.10A statistical evaluation of recent full reference image quality assessment algorithms
IFC13962005.11WithAn information fidelity criterion for image quality assessment using natural scene statistics
Tone-Mapped images Quality Index (TMQI)6302012.10WithObjective quality assessment of tone-mapped images
3012007.09Blind image quality assessment through anisotropy
Dynamic Range Independent quality Measure (DRIM) 2008.08WithDynamic range independent image quality assessment
📖Traditional Machine Learning Method
BRISQUE59752012.08WithoutNo-reference image quality assessment in the spatial domain
DIIVINE17582011.01WithoutBlind image quality assessment: From natural scene statistics to perceptual quality
IL-NIQE12942015.04WithoutA feature-enriched completely blind image quality evaluator
2272009.03WithoutNo-reference image quality assessment using modified extreme learning machine classifier
Multi-Method Fusion (MMF)1952012.12WithImage quality assessment using multi-method fusion
1472010.01Objective image quality assessment based on support vector regression
SVDR1522011.09WithSVD-based quality metric for image and video using machine learning
1642015.03WithoutBlind Image Quality Assessment Based on Multichannel Feature Fusion and Label Transfer
ParaBoost922015.12WithA paraboost method to image quality assessment
📖CNN-Based Method
139442018.01The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metric
IQA-CNN12672014.09WithoutConvolutional neural networks for no-reference image quality assessment
2017.10FR+NRDeep neural networks for no-reference and full-reference image quality assessment
DISTS9392020.12WithImage Quality Assessment: Unifying Structure and Texture Similarity
BIQA by a Self-Adaptive
Hyper Network
8412020.06WithoutBlindly Assess Image Quality in the Wild Guided by a Self-Adaptive Hyper Network
MEON6192017.11End-to-end blind image quality assessment using deep neural networks
RankIQA5132017.07WithoutRankIQA: Learning from rankings for no-reference image quality assessment
BIECON4582016.12WithoutFully deep blind image quality predictor
3682014.08Blind image quality assessment via deep learning
DeepBIQ2772016.02WithoutOn the use of deep learning for blind image quality assessment
Deep image Quality Assessment (DeepQA)2642017.10WithDeep learning of human visual sensitivity in image quality assessment framework
DeepSim1722017.09WithDeepSim: deep similarity for image quality assessment
942014.09WithoutBlind image quality assessment using semi-supervised rectifier networks
Re-IQA1442023.04WithoutRe-IQA: Unsupervised Learning for Image Quality Assessment in the Wild
Multi-Pooled Inception Features for NR IQA372020.02WithoutMulti-Pooled Inception Features for No-Reference Image Quality Assessment
IQMA Network242021.06WithIQMA Network: Image Quality Multi-Scale Assessment Network
📖Transformer-Based Method
MUSIQ9502021.08WithoutMUSIQ: Multi-Scale Image Quality Transformer
ViT with relative ranking
and self-consistency
4442021.08WithoutNo-reference image quality assessment via transformers, relative ranking,and self-consistency
Maniqa 2022.04WithoutManiqa: Muli-dimension attention network for no-reference image quality assessment
TRIQ 2020.12WithoutTransformer for Image Quality Assessment
IQT1682021.04WithPerceptual Image Quality Assessment With Transformers
NTIRE 2021 Challenge
on Perceptual IQA
552021.05NTIRE 2021 Challenge on Perceptual Image Quality Assessment
NTIRE 2022 Challenge
on Perceptual IQA
2022.06NTIRE 2022 Challenge on Perceptual Image Quality Assessment
Jacobian Lens Distance (JLD)2026.10WithJLD: Perceptual Distance Through A Jacobian Lens
📖Framework-Based Method
QAC4042013.06WithoutLearning without human scores for blind image quality assessment
MetalQA 2020.04WithoutMetalQA: Deep Meta-Learning for No-Reference Image Quality Assessment
3312018.06Deep CNN-based blind image quality predictor
UNIQUE3252021.03WithoutUncertainty-Aware Blind Image Quality Assessment in the Laboratory and Wild
Hallucinated-IQA2642018.04WithoutHallucinated-IQA: No-reference image quality assessment via adversarial learning
CONTRIQUE2842022.06WithoutImage quality assessment using contrastive learning
DeepFL-IQA312020.01WithoutDeepFL-IQA: Weak Supervision for Deep IQA Feature Learning
CVRDK-IQA492022.02WithoutContent-Variant Reference Image Quality Assessment via Knowledge Distillation
CNN-Based Medical
Ultrasound IQA
292021.07WithoutCNN-Based Medical Ultrasound Image Quality Assessment
📖Medical IQA
4292018.04WithoutQuantitative assessment of structural image quality
📖IQA for Dehazing Algorithm
2522019.02WithQuality evaluation of image dehazing methods using synthetic hazy images
📖Portrait Quality Assessment
162024.04WithoutDeep Portrait Quality Assessment. A NTIRE 2024 Challenge Survey
📖IQA for Low Light Enhancement
NLIEE472021.06WithoutA no-reference evaluation metric for low-light image enhancement
📖Specific Distortion
7592009.04WithoutA no-reference objective image sharpness metric based on the notion of just noticeable blur (JNB)
BIBLE2702015.01WithoutNo-reference image blur assessment based on discrete orthogonal moments
1012013.11A no-reference metric for evaluating the quality of motion deblurring
222015.02WithoutFull reference image quality metrics for JPEG compressed images

👨‍💻 Contributers

💡 Citation

If you find this survey useful, please cite our paper:

@misc{ma2025surveyimagequalityassessment,
      title={A Survey on Image Quality Assessment: Insights, Analysis, and Future Outlook}, 
      author={Chengqian Ma and Zhengyi Shi and Zhiqiang Lu and Shenghao Xie and Fei Chao and Yao Sui},
      year={2025},
      eprint={2502.08540},
      archivePrefix={arXiv},
      primaryClass={cs.CV},
      url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.08540}, 
}

📧 Contact Us

If you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us via: